TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNICAL DISCUSSION (Continued) 6.0 MonArb Area (Continued) 6.8 Wood Field 34 6.9 Figures 7.0 Mariner Area 36 7.1 Mariner Field 37 7.2 Mariner East Field 40 7.3 Cadet Field 41 7.4 Figures 8.0 Jade and Jade South Fields 42 8.1 Geology 42 8.2 Methodology 42 8.3 Reserves by Project 43 8.4 Figures
TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNICAL DISCUSSION (Continued) 9.0 Cook Field 44 9.1 Geology 44 9.2 Methodology 45 9.3 Contingent Resources by Project 45 9.4 Figures 10.0 Erskine Field 47 10.1 Geology 47 10.2 Methodology 47 10.3 Contingent Resources by Project 48 10.4 Figures 11.0 Elgin-Franklin Field 49 11.1 Elgin Area 50 11.2 Franklin Area 50 11.3 West Franklin Area 51 11.4 Compression Projects 51 11.5 Reserves and Contingent Resources by Project 51 11.6 Figures 12.0 Alba Field 53 12.1 Geology 53 12.2 Methodology 53 12.3 Reserves and Contingent Resources by Project 54 12.4 Figures 13.0 Pierce Field 56 13.1 Geology 56 13.2 Methodology 57 13.3 Contingent Resources by Project 57 13.4 Figures 14.0 Columba Terraces Area 58 14.1 Geology 58 14.2 Methodology 58 14.3 Figures
TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNICAL DISCUSSION (Continued) 15.0 Cambo Field 59 15.1 Geology 59 15.2 Methodology 59 15.3 Contingent Resources by Project 60 15.4 Figures 16.0 Rosebank Field 62 16.1 Geology 62 16.2 Methodology 63 16.3 Contingent Resources by Project 63 16.4 Figures 17.0 Tornado Field 64 17.1 Geology 64 17.2 Methodology 64 17.3 Contingent Resources by Project 65 17.4 Figures 18.0 Marigold Field 66 18.1 Geology 66 18.2 Methodology 67 18.3 Contingent Resources by Project 67 18.4 Figures 19.0 Fotla Field 68 19.1 Geology 68 19.2 Methodology 68 19.3 Contingent Resources by Project 69 19.4 Figures 20.0 Isabella Field 70 20.1 Geology 70 20.2 Methodology 70 20.3 Contingent Resources by Project 71 20.4 Figures 21.0 Leverett Field 72 21.1 Geology 72 21.2 Methodology 72 21.3 Contingent Resources by Project 73 21.4 Figures 22.0 Decommissioning Assets 74
TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNICAL DISCUSSION (Continued) 23.0 Economic Analysis 75 23.1 Prices and Price Adjustments 75 23.2 Sales Conversion Factors 76 23.3 Operating, Capital, and Abandonment Costs 78 23.3.2.1 Operating Costs 79 23.3.2.2 Capital Costs 79 23.3.2.3 Abandonment Costs 80 23.3.4.1 Operating Costs 80 23.3.4.2 Capital Costs 80 23.3.4.3 Abandonment Costs 80 23.4 Figures 24.0 Summary of Reserves, Contingent Resources, and Recovery 85 24.1 Figures Summary Projections of Reserves and Revenue by Area and Field Before UK Corporate Income Taxes
TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNICAL DISCUSSION (Continued) 24.0 Summary of Reserves, Contingent Resources, and Recovery (Continued) 24.2 Figures Summary Projections of Resources and Cash Flow by Area and Field Before UK Corporate Income Taxes 24.3 Figures Summary of Estimated Ultimate Recovery and Recovery Factors by Field 25.0 Reconciliation with Previous NSAI Estimates 86
SUMMARY PROJECTION OF RESERVES AND REVENUE AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 SUMMARY - CERTAIN PROPERTIES ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED INTEREST LOCATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE PROVED (1P) RESERVES NORTH SEA AND IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN PERIOD GROSS RESERVES WORKING INTEREST RESERVES AVERAGE PRICES WORKING INTEREST REVENUE AFTER ROYALTIES ENDING OIL GAS OIL GAS NGL EQUIV OIL GAS NGL OIL GAS NGL TOTAL M-D-Y MBBL MMCF MBBL MMCF MBBL MBOE $/BBL $/MCF $/BBL M$ M$ M$ M$ 12-31-2022 33,477.2 142,284.2 8,632.7 26,921.2 682.4 13,956.7 102.26 33.213 71.71 882,809.2 1,825,889.6 12-31-2023 59,167.2 245,482.5 14,993.7 44,879.9 1,227.3 23,958.9 94.08 24.684 66.38 1,410,537.1 2,599,848.9 12-31-2024 52,975.5 197,125.4 13,512.7 37,693.4 1,050.2 21,061.8 84.00 15.907 59.37 1,135,111.2 1,797,039.8 12-31-2025 54,581.3 159,210.0 19,351.5 31,750.1 866.5 25,692.1 77.60 12.689 54.27 1,501,738.1 1,951,619.4 12-31-2026 47,110.8 120,379.4 16,654.5 22,916.0 600.6 21,206.1 78.79 10.406 53.89 1,312,226.1 1,583,068.2 12-31-2027 36,864.2 96,103.0 10,850.2 14,456.5 350.6 13,693.4 79.89 10.390 52.08 866,830.9 1,035,295.4 12-31-2028 31,417.3 78,338.0 8,619.6 12,353.8 287.2 11,036.8 81.89 10.575 52.80 705,866.3 851,678.1 12-31-2029 28,059.4 64,083.9 7,455.0 10,472.1 237.5 9,498.0 82.90 10.763 53.03 618,054.4 743,357.9 12-31-2030 22,142.6 49,581.4 4,690.7 8,317.7 198.9 6,323.6 84.55 10.892 54.15 396,615.7 497,979.2 12-31-2031 18,884.9 40,773.6 2,938.9 6,798.4 160.5 4,271.6 86.04 11.015 54.69 252,873.0 336,540.1 12-31-2032 14,665.5 22,258.3 1,407.5 2,780.8 58.8 1,945.8 87.84 11.120 54.68 123,638.5 157,775.4 12-31-2033 11,994.6 14,613.8 1,129.2 900.6 25.4 1,309.8 89.81 11.645 61.82 101,418.3 113,474.0 12-31-2034 10,415.1 13,664.5 985.9 842.4 23.7 1,154.8 92.91 11.871 63.84 91,607.7 103,118.5 12-31-2035 9,205.6 12,789.4 875.8 788.8 22.1 1,033.9 95.00 12.101 65.18 83,203.6 94,188.0 12-31-2036 8,330.5 11,981.4 795.6 739.3 20.6 943.7 98.06 12.334 67.20 78,020.2 88,524.8 SUBTOTAL 439,291.8 1,268,668.7 112,893.7 222,610.8 5,812.3 157,087.2 84.69 17.394 59.67 9,560,550.4 13,779,397.4 REMAINING 14,524.1 19,669.2 1,553.3 1,243.4 28.4 1,796.1 104.80 12.114 69.86 162,777.8 179,824.4 TOTAL 453,815.9 1,288,337.9 114,446.9 223,854.2 5,840.7 158,883.2 84.96 17.364 59.72 9,723,328.2 13,959,221.8 CUM PROD 2,543,413.8 8,704,724.1 ULTIMATE 2,997,229.6 9,993,062.0 FUTURE NET REVENUE NET DEDUCTIONS/EXPENDITURES AFTER UK CORPORATE INCOME TAXES PERIOD NUMBER OF TAXES CAPITAL ABDNMNT OPERATING UNDISCOUNTED DISC AT 10.000% PRESENT WORTH PROFILE ENDING ACTIVE COMPLETIONS PRODUCTION INCOME COST COST EXPENSE PERIOD CUM CUM DISC RATE CUM PW M-D-Y GROSS NET M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ % M$ 12-31-2022 201 72.2 0.0 295,373.5 214,509.0 272.4 258,279.3 1,057,455.4 1,057,455.4 1,031,399.2 12-31-2023 212 73.9 0.0 351,473.9 368,048.9 6,585.4 531,465.3 1,342,275.4 2,399,730.8 2,256,337.1 12-31-2024 217 74.3 0.0 147,479.5 367,886.8 2,890.9 544,925.6 733,857.0 3,133,587.8 2,862,738.8 12-31-2025 225 81.2 0.0 202,476.9 321,477.2 3,923.3 563,053.0 860,689.0 3,994,276.8 3,505,209.6 12-31-2026 211 75.2 0.0 159,585.6 205,195.1 11,674.9 519,019.2 687,593.3 4,681,870.2 3,978,819.4 12-31-2027 199 66.9 0.0 108,342.3 231,444.7 69,420.3 373,289.3 252,798.7 4,934,668.9 4,136,019.7 12-31-2028 161 51.2 0.0 109,904.1 69,519.3 69,107.9 346,704.0 256,442.8 5,191,111.7 4,279,430.3 12-31-2029 158 49.1 0.0 75,334.7 51,296.8 101,057.4 339,888.2 175,780.8 5,366,892.6 4,368,750.7 12-31-2030 150 44.3 0.0 -4,652.6 36,502.8 191,171.1 285,814.1 -10,856.2 5,356,036.4 4,362,916.2 12-31-2031 132 35.5 0.0 -61,183.3 22,959.4 279,031.9 238,493.2 -142,761.1 5,213,275.3 4,300,496.1 12-31-2032 101 15.4 0.0 -84,380.6 610.3 343,612.2 94,821.7 -196,888.1 5,016,387.2 4,225,812.7 12-31-2033 71 6.9 0.0 -93,053.0 863.6 352,738.8 70,048.3 -217,123.6 4,799,263.6 4,149,952.3 12-31-2034 71 6.9 0.0 -72,348.7 972.6 272,783.3 70,524.9 -168,813.7 4,630,449.9 4,096,164.9 12-31-2035 67 6.6 0.0 -39,791.6 473.0 155,474.0 70,879.8 -92,847.1 4,537,602.8 4,068,645.3 12-31-2036 65 6.4 0.0 -37,255.6 912.1 140,059.9 71,738.1 -86,929.7 4,450,673.1 4,045,028.6 SUBTOTAL 0.0 1,057,305.0 1,892,671.6 1,999,803.7 4,378,944.0 4,450,673.1 4,450,673.1 4,045,028.6 REMAINING 0.0 -60,501.2 3,482.0 419,970.9 156,405.6 -339,532.9 4,111,140.2 3,985,975.0 TOTAL OF 18.0 YRS 0.0 996,803.8 1,896,153.7 2,419,774.6 4,535,349.6 4,111,140.2 4,111,140.2 3,985,975.0 check All estimates and exhibits herein are art of the NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. BASED ON ESCALATED PRICE AND COST PARAMETERS 599,576.2 62,352.3 894,144.2 48,936.2 1,107,835.8 81,476.0 402,862.1 47,019.2 238,472.8 32,369.3 150,202.1 18,262.4 130,646.6 15,165.2 112,710.3 12,593.2 90,594.4 10,769.1 74,887.4 8,779.7 30,921.0 3,215.9 10,488.1 1,567.6 3,887,067.3 348,826.3 10,000.7 1,510.1 9,545.0 1,439.4 9,118.3 1,386.3 3,872,005.1 346,841.9 15,062.2 1,984.4 05.000 4,138,102.9 10.000 3,985,975.0 15.000 3,780,450.1 20.000 3,569,394.1 25.000 3,370,554.8 30.000 3,189,576.9 50.000 2,637,316.3 35.000 3,027,199.1 40.000 2,882,250.0 45.000 2,752,922.9 Table I
SUMMARY PROJECTION OF RESERVES AND REVENUE AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 SUMMARY - CERTAIN PROPERTIES ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED INTEREST LOCATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE PROBABLE RESERVES NORTH SEA AND IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN PERIOD GROSS RESERVES WORKING INTEREST RESERVES AVERAGE PRICES WORKING INTEREST REVENUE AFTER ROYALTIES ENDING OIL GAS OIL GAS NGL EQUIV OIL GAS NGL OIL GAS NGL TOTAL M-D-Y MBBL MMCF MBBL MMCF MBBL MBOE $/BBL $/MCF $/BBL M$ M$ M$ M$ 12-31-2022 4,519.9 15,854.0 1,357.2 2,969.3 64.3 1,933.4 101.81 35.129 72.59 138,176.4 247,149.7 12-31-2023 12,037.3 41,876.3 3,922.5 8,751.4 208.4 5,639.8 93.92 26.311 67.92 368,419.4 612,836.4 12-31-2024 17,725.6 43,639.2 4,786.0 11,801.1 322.5 7,143.2 83.70 16.711 62.17 400,609.2 617,867.3 12-31-2025 19,635.9 47,870.7 6,055.5 12,566.0 348.5 8,570.6 77.27 13.201 57.02 467,895.4 653,647.8 12-31-2026 20,932.2 58,463.2 7,283.0 12,805.5 375.6 9,866.5 78.03 10.932 57.82 568,299.2 730,005.5 12-31-2027 20,317.0 57,578.2 6,889.7 15,530.7 468.2 10,035.6 78.66 11.158 58.71 541,910.1 742,686.0 12-31-2028 18,798.0 50,168.9 5,920.9 12,137.5 374.5 8,388.1 80.66 11.348 59.94 477,599.4 637,780.6 12-31-2029 14,837.1 35,037.6 4,263.2 6,681.6 214.4 5,629.7 82.22 11.278 59.46 350,541.7 438,650.3 12-31-2030 13,734.6 30,263.7 3,704.2 3,967.7 100.2 4,488.5 84.41 11.260 58.42 312,665.9 363,196.7 12-31-2031 12,964.5 28,616.0 3,428.1 3,996.1 103.1 4,220.2 86.42 11.563 60.16 296,247.5 348,653.9 12-31-2032 13,147.2 38,633.2 3,921.9 6,765.6 175.3 5,263.7 89.67 11.551 60.10 351,680.4 440,366.7 12-31-2033 10,337.6 34,184.1 3,005.9 6,996.0 162.8 4,374.9 91.86 11.619 59.05 276,125.0 367,019.5 12-31-2034 7,038.6 25,746.7 1,636.1 5,654.4 131.7 2,742.7 94.80 11.785 60.23 155,112.2 229,684.4 12-31-2035 4,395.8 7,877.5 461.9 1,611.8 35.1 774.9 94.98 12.144 62.25 43,872.4 65,627.4 12-31-2036 3,638.0 2,056.3 358.5 130.8 2.8 383.8 97.71 11.579 67.20 35,023.7 36,727.7 SUBTOTAL 194,059.3 517,865.7 56,994.9 112,365.5 3,087.4 79,455.7 83.94 13.902 60.13 4,784,177.7 6,531,899.7 REMAINING 48,868.1 17,875.4 5,299.8 1,251.1 3.6 5,519.1 113.69 10.689 69.86 602,530.9 616,155.4 TOTAL 242,927.4 535,741.1 62,294.7 113,616.6 3,091.0 84,974.8 86.47 13.866 60.14 5,386,708.6 7,148,055.1 CUM PROD  3,099. ULTIMATE  538,840. FUTURE NET REVENUE NET DEDUCTIONS/EXPENDITURES AFTER UK CORPORATE INCOME TAXES PERIOD NUMBER OF TAXES CAPITAL ABDNMNT OPERATING UNDISCOUNTED DISC AT 10.000% PRESENT WORTH PROFILE ENDING ACTIVE COMPLETIONS PRODUCTION INCOME COST COST EXPENSE PERIOD CUM CUM DISC RATE CUM PW M-D-Y GROSS NET M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ % M$ 12-31-2022 5 2.7 0.0 60,482.1 579.2 0.0 4,178.8 181,909.6 181,909.6 176,793.0 12-31-2023 9 5.1 0.0 149,589.4 0.0 -6,391.0 14,478.6 455,159.3 637,069.0 589,880.3 12-31-2024 14 7.1 0.0 155,230.4 13,928.8 -2,885.0 28,436.0 423,157.1 1,060,226.1 938,179.8 12-31-2025 15 6.5 0.0 655,277.7 0.0 2,760.1 40,637.0 -45,027.0 1,015,199.0 903,273.6 12-31-2026 29 11.9 0.0 415,656.9 1,875.1 -9,684.6 82,642.6 239,515.5 1,254,714.5 1,067,116.4 12-31-2027 37 16.9 0.0 257,364.1 4,261.6 -63,396.7 211,867.0 332,590.0 1,587,304.5 1,273,986.9 12-31-2028 67 26.7 0.0 217,337.9 1,445.4 -59,446.7 232,935.9 245,508.3 1,832,812.8 1,414,154.8 12-31-2029 66 25.1 0.0 179,601.4 0.0 -69,992.3 114,402.8 214,638.3 2,047,451.1 1,526,044.8 12-31-2030 33 12.0 0.0 130,105.0 2,081.9 -81,789.2 107,735.4 205,063.5 2,252,514.6 1,622,623.7 12-31-2031 43 15.2 0.0 132,736.5 1,373.6 -187,316.0 147,966.9 253,892.9 2,506,407.5 1,731,285.5 12-31-2032 68 33.4 0.0 141,096.3 1,401.3 -278,692.1 294,285.3 282,275.9 2,788,683.4 1,839,133.7 12-31-2033 92 40.0 0.0 86,671.0 952.9 -203,231.4 275,076.3 207,550.6 2,996,234.0 1,912,430.0 12-31-2034 67 29.5 0.0 -10,131.8 0.0 19,135.8 175,587.5 45,092.9 3,041,326.9 1,927,925.3 12-31-2035 43 10.1 0.0 -75,884.4 0.0 194,875.6 27,303.2 -80,667.0 2,960,659.9 1,905,610.5 12-31-2036 9 0.8 0.0 -92,554.2 0.0 234,850.4 2,216.3 -107,784.9 2,852,875.0 1,877,895.1 SUBTOTAL 0.0 2,402,578.1 27,899.9 -511,203.0 1,759,749.7 2,852,875.0 2,852,875.0 1,877,895.1 REMAINING 0.0 -289,494.4 3,398.7 660,902.3 425,081.8 -183,733.0 2,669,142.0 1,841,135.4 TOTAL OF 25.5 YRS 0.0 2,113,083.8 31,298.7 149,699.3 2,184,831.5 2,669,142.0 2,669,142.0 1,841,135.4 check All estimates and exhibits herein are art of the NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. BASED ON ESCALATED PRICE AND COST PARAMETERS 197,205.6 20,052.5 104,306.7 4,666.7 230,260.3 14,156.7 165,881.0 19,871.4 139,987.8 21,718.5 173,288.2 27,487.7 137,735.2 22,446.0 75,358.2 12,750.3 44,677.0 5,853.8 46,206.7 6,199.7 78,148.7 10,537.6 81,283.6 9,610.8 1,575,439.4 185,907.1 66,639.7 7,932.6 19,572.9 2,182.1 1,515.0 188.9 1,562,066.5 185,655.5 13,372.9 251.6 05.000 2,203,399.0 10.000 1,841,135.4 15.000 1,568,987.1 20.000 1,363,499.3 25.000 1,205,887.5 30.000 1,082,748.3 50.000 785,213.0 35.000 984,737.5 40.000 905,328.8 45.000 839,917.9 Table II
SUMMARY PROJECTION OF RESERVES AND REVENUE AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 SUMMARY - CERTAIN PROPERTIES ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED INTEREST LOCATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE PROVED + PROBABLE (2P) RESERVES NORTH SEA AND IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN PERIOD GROSS RESERVES WORKING INTEREST RESERVES AVERAGE PRICES WORKING INTEREST REVENUE AFTER ROYALTIES ENDING OIL GAS OIL GAS NGL EQUIV OIL GAS NGL OIL GAS NGL TOTAL M-D-Y MBBL MMCF MBBL MMCF MBBL MBOE $/BBL $/MCF $/BBL M$ M$ M$ M$ 12-31-2022 37,997.2 158,138.2 9,989.9 29,890.5 746.7 15,890.1 102.20 33.404 71.79 1,020,985.6 2,073,039.4 12-31-2023 71,204.5 287,358.8 18,916.2 53,631.3 1,435.8 29,598.8 94.04 24.950 66.61 1,778,956.5 3,212,685.2 12-31-2024 70,701.0 240,764.6 18,298.7 49,494.5 1,372.7 28,205.0 83.93 16.098 60.03 1,535,720.4 2,414,907.0 12-31-2025 74,217.2 207,080.7 25,407.0 44,316.1 1,215.0 34,262.7 77.52 12.834 55.06 1,969,633.5 2,605,267.2 12-31-2026 68,043.0 178,842.5 23,937.5 35,721.5 976.2 31,072.6 78.56 10.595 55.40 1,880,525.3 2,313,073.7 12-31-2027 57,181.1 153,681.2 17,739.9 29,987.2 818.8 23,729.0 79.41 10.788 55.87 1,408,741.0 1,777,981.4 12-31-2028 50,215.2 128,506.8 14,540.5 24,491.3 661.7 19,424.9 81.39 10.958 56.84 1,183,465.7 1,489,458.7 12-31-2029 42,896.5 99,121.5 11,718.3 17,153.7 451.9 15,127.7 82.66 10.964 56.08 968,596.1 1,182,008.1 12-31-2030 35,877.2 79,845.1 8,394.9 12,285.4 299.1 10,812.2 84.49 11.011 55.58 709,281.6 861,175.8 12-31-2031 31,849.4 69,389.6 6,367.1 10,794.5 263.6 8,491.8 86.24 11.218 56.83 549,120.4 685,194.0 12-31-2032 27,812.7 60,891.4 5,329.4 9,546.4 234.1 7,209.5 89.19 11.425 58.74 475,318.9 598,142.2 12-31-2033 22,332.2 48,798.0 4,135.2 7,896.6 188.1 5,684.8 91.30 11.622 59.42 377,543.4 480,493.5 12-31-2034 17,453.7 39,411.1 2,622.1 6,496.8 155.4 3,897.6 94.09 11.797 60.78 246,719.8 332,802.9 12-31-2035 13,601.5 20,666.9 1,337.8 2,400.5 57.1 1,808.8 94.99 12.130 63.39 127,076.0 159,815.5 12-31-2036 11,968.6 14,037.7 1,154.1 870.1 23.4 1,327.6 97.95 12.221 67.20 113,043.9 125,252.5 SUBTOTAL 633,351.1 1,786,534.3 169,888.6 334,976.4 8,899.8 236,542.8 84.44 16.222 59.83 14,344,728.1 20,311,297.2 REMAINING 63,392.2 37,544.6 6,853.1 2,494.5 32.0 7,315.2 111.67 11.399 69.86 765,308.7 795,979.8 TOTAL 696,743.3 1,824,079.0 176,741.6 337,470.8 8,931.8 243,858.0 85.49 16.187 59.87 15,110,036.8 21,107,276.9 CUM PROD  8,707,823. ULTIMATE  10,531,902. FUTURE NET REVENUE NET DEDUCTIONS/EXPENDITURES AFTER UK CORPORATE INCOME TAXES PERIOD NUMBER OF TAXES CAPITAL ABDNMNT OPERATING UNDISCOUNTED DISC AT 10.000% PRESENT WORTH PROFILE ENDING ACTIVE COMPLETIONS PRODUCTION INCOME COST COST EXPENSE PERIOD CUM CUM DISC RATE CUM PW M-D-Y GROSS NET M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ % M$ 12-31-2022 206 74.8 0.0 355,855.6 215,088.2 272.4 262,458.2 1,239,365.0 1,239,365.0 1,208,192.1 12-31-2023 221 79.0 0.0 501,063.3 368,048.9 194.4 545,943.9 1,797,434.7 3,036,799.7 2,846,217.4 12-31-2024 231 81.4 0.0 302,709.9 381,815.6 5.9 573,361.6 1,157,014.1 4,193,813.8 3,800,918.6 12-31-2025 240 87.7 0.0 857,754.5 321,477.2 6,683.5 603,689.9 815,662.0 5,009,475.9 4,408,483.2 12-31-2026 240 87.1 0.0 575,242.5 207,070.2 1,990.3 601,661.8 927,108.8 5,936,584.7 5,045,935.9 12-31-2027 236 83.7 0.0 365,706.4 235,706.3 6,023.6 585,156.3 585,388.7 6,521,973.4 5,410,006.6 12-31-2028 228 77.8 0.0 327,241.9 70,964.7 9,661.2 579,639.9 501,951.1 7,023,924.5 5,693,585.1 12-31-2029 224 74.2 0.0 254,936.0 51,296.8 31,065.1 454,291.1 390,419.1 7,414,343.6 5,894,795.6 12-31-2030 183 56.3 0.0 125,452.3 38,584.8 109,381.9 393,549.5 194,207.4 7,608,551.0 5,985,539.9 12-31-2031 175 50.7 0.0 71,553.2 24,333.0 91,715.9 386,460.1 111,131.8 7,719,682.8 6,031,781.6 12-31-2032 169 48.8 0.0 56,715.6 2,011.6 64,920.1 389,107.0 85,387.8 7,805,070.6 6,064,946.4 12-31-2033 163 47.0 0.0 -6,382.0 1,816.5 149,507.4 345,124.5 -9,573.0 7,795,497.6 6,062,382.3 12-31-2034 138 36.4 0.0 -82,480.5 972.6 291,919.2 246,112.5 -123,720.8 7,671,776.8 6,024,090.1 12-31-2035 110 16.6 0.0 -115,676.1 473.0 350,349.6 98,183.1 -173,514.1 7,498,262.7 5,974,255.8 12-31-2036 74 7.2 0.0 -129,809.7 912.1 374,910.4 73,954.4 -194,714.6 7,303,548.1 5,922,923.7 SUBTOTAL 0.0 3,459,883.1 1,920,571.6 1,488,600.7 6,138,693.7 7,303,548.1 7,303,548.1 5,922,923.7 REMAINING 0.0 -349,995.5 6,880.8 1,080,873.1 581,487.3 -523,265.9 6,780,282.2 5,827,110.4 TOTAL OF 25.5 YRS 0.0 3,109,887.6 1,927,452.3 2,569,473.8 6,720,181.1 6,780,282.2 6,780,282.2 5,827,110.4 check All estimates and exhibits herein are art of the NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. BASED ON ESCALATED PRICE AND COST PARAMETERS 796,781.8 82,404.8 998,450.9 53,602.9 1,338,096.0 95,632.7 568,743.1 66,890.6 378,460.6 54,087.8 323,490.3 45,750.1 268,381.8 37,611.2 188,068.5 25,343.5 135,271.4 16,622.8 121,094.1 14,979.5 109,069.7 13,753.6 91,771.7 11,178.5 5,462,506.7 534,733.4 76,640.4 9,442.7 29,118.0 3,621.5 10,633.3 1,575.2 5,434,071.6 532,497.5 28,435.1 2,236.0 05.000 6,341,502.0 10.000 5,827,110.4 15.000 5,349,437.2 20.000 4,932,893.4 25.000 4,576,442.3 30.000 4,272,325.2 50.000 3,422,529.3 35.000 4,011,936.6 40.000 3,787,578.8 45.000 3,592,840.9 Table III
SUMMARY PROJECTION OF RESERVES AND REVENUE AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 SUMMARY - CERTAIN PROPERTIES ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED INTEREST LOCATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE POSSIBLE RESERVES NORTH SEA AND IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN PERIOD GROSS RESERVES WORKING INTEREST RESERVES AVERAGE PRICES WORKING INTEREST REVENUE AFTER ROYALTIES ENDING OIL GAS OIL GAS NGL EQUIV OIL GAS NGL OIL GAS NGL TOTAL M-D-Y MBBL MMCF MBBL MMCF MBBL MBOE $/BBL $/MCF $/BBL M$ M$ M$ M$ 12-31-2022 4,107.2 9,158.5 886.4 1,737.7 37.6 1,223.6 102.22 34.544 74.00 90,611.8 153,417.8 12-31-2023 12,746.6 29,623.5 3,464.2 5,578.0 127.8 4,553.7 94.44 25.865 67.26 327,174.4 480,043.1 12-31-2024 19,281.4 39,748.0 4,895.9 6,785.1 165.7 6,231.4 84.18 16.333 60.22 412,131.6 532,928.1 12-31-2025 20,166.7 48,034.0 6,546.9 12,232.4 339.2 8,995.1 77.58 13.084 56.48 507,873.8 687,082.8 12-31-2026 17,264.3 39,819.4 6,119.7 10,570.3 280.0 8,222.1 78.59 10.849 57.39 480,964.9 611,716.1 12-31-2027 17,095.4 40,348.1 6,132.2 9,633.5 255.9 8,049.1 79.15 10.991 57.84 485,374.6 606,053.5 12-31-2028 15,066.4 42,488.4 4,966.6 9,424.5 273.2 6,864.7 81.17 11.250 59.40 403,117.1 520,373.5 12-31-2029 15,933.2 52,423.0 5,008.7 12,674.2 377.7 7,571.6 81.61 11.654 60.71 408,763.0 579,395.4 12-31-2030 14,864.7 46,340.3 4,262.4 11,451.8 372.3 6,609.2 83.94 11.738 61.75 357,779.4 515,195.4 12-31-2031 13,579.6 40,904.1 3,637.5 9,480.2 313.9 5,585.9 86.04 11.889 62.78 312,949.5 445,363.5 12-31-2032 10,653.6 32,321.2 2,666.6 6,191.4 195.3 3,929.4 89.56 12.040 64.13 238,820.9 325,890.6 12-31-2033 10,603.9 31,050.5 2,658.7 4,023.7 126.5 3,478.9 91.52 12.027 64.10 243,326.7 299,828.9 12-31-2034 11,428.3 30,506.9 3,366.9 4,176.1 116.4 4,203.3 94.66 12.229 65.62 318,710.5 377,419.1 12-31-2035 11,935.8 42,954.8 3,785.0 7,328.0 192.5 5,240.9 97.10 12.225 64.31 367,521.2 469,481.6 12-31-2036 10,975.2 42,296.9 3,391.6 7,858.6 196.0 4,942.5 100.12 12.463 65.71 339,564.5 450,389.6 SUBTOTAL 205,702.3 568,017.7 61,789.1 119,145.4 3,370.1 85,701.5 85.69 13.077 61.36 5,294,683.8 7,054,579.1 REMAINING 43,185.1 61,766.4 10,503.5 12,120.2 274.7 12,867.9 108.17 13.045 70.13 1,136,152.1 1,313,527.5 TOTAL 248,887.4 629,784.1 72,292.6 131,265.7 3,644.8 98,569.3 88.96 13.075 62.02 6,430,835.9 8,368,106.6 CUM PROD   ULTIMATE  632,77. FUTURE NET REVENUE NET DEDUCTIONS/EXPENDITURES AFTER UK CORPORATE INCOME TAXES PERIOD NUMBER OF TAXES CAPITAL ABDNMNT OPERATING UNDISCOUNTED DISC AT 10.000% PRESENT WORTH PROFILE ENDING ACTIVE COMPLETIONS PRODUCTION INCOME COST COST EXPENSE PERIOD CUM CUM DISC RATE CUM PW M-D-Y GROSS NET M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ % M$ 12-31-2022 1 0.3 0.0 38,071.5 0.0 0.0 1,132.0 114,214.4 114,214.4 111,564.4 12-31-2023 2 1.2 0.0 117,630.7 0.0 0.0 9,520.5 352,891.9 467,106.3 430,349.1 12-31-2024 7 5.0 0.0 473,099.2 0.0 0.0 12,461.4 47,367.5 514,473.8 469,218.8 12-31-2025 12 6.4 0.0 529,308.9 0.0 -6,683.5 33,138.1 131,319.3 645,793.1 566,982.4 12-31-2026 15 7.8 0.0 241,630.6 853.0 -1,990.3 40,533.8 330,689.0 976,482.1 793,609.3 12-31-2027 20 10.1 0.0 223,114.8 4,016.5 537.2 43,085.2 335,299.8 1,311,781.9 1,001,632.7 12-31-2028 24 10.9 0.0 194,697.7 0.0 -5,506.0 39,135.3 292,046.5 1,603,828.4 1,167,258.9 12-31-2029 20 8.7 0.0 180,412.5 1,179.4 -24,840.5 151,840.9 270,803.1 1,874,631.5 1,306,853.9 12-31-2030 59 24.5 0.0 180,212.3 1,203.0 -105,799.9 169,073.5 270,506.4 2,145,137.9 1,434,355.2 12-31-2031 62 23.8 0.0 149,306.0 612.8 -82,939.1 154,328.9 224,054.8 2,369,192.8 1,530,735.7 12-31-2032 59 22.3 0.0 115,882.6 -1.1 -37,272.2 73,457.5 173,823.8 2,543,016.5 1,597,603.7 12-31-2033 25 7.9 0.0 108,196.5 475.4 -37,231.1 65,735.2 162,652.9 2,705,669.4 1,653,180.9 12-31-2034 42 15.6 0.0 154,569.1 1,456.8 -174,260.4 163,420.2 232,233.3 2,937,902.7 1,724,974.8 12-31-2035 65 33.7 0.0 189,863.6 1,486.0 -297,995.5 291,026.1 285,101.5 3,223,004.2 1,806,839.9 12-31-2036 95 39.8 0.0 179,159.7 1,515.7 -309,581.7 310,177.1 269,118.9 3,492,123.0 1,877,778.0 SUBTOTAL 0.0 3,075,155.7 12,797.6 -1,083,563.0 1,558,065.8 3,492,123.0 3,492,123.0 1,877,778.0 REMAINING 0.0 -363,220.4 2,071.7 1,285,336.5 934,498.9 -545,159.1 2,946,963.9 1,812,942.5 TOTAL OF 25.5 YRS 0.0 2,711,935.3 14,869.3 201,773.5 2,492,564.6 2,946,963.9 2,946,963.9 1,812,942.5 check All estimates and exhibits herein are art of the NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. BASED ON ESCALATED PRICE AND COST PARAMETERS 110,818.6 9,977.9 60,026.3 2,779.6 144,271.6 8,597.1 160,049.7 19,159.3 114,681.7 16,069.5 105,878.0 14,800.9 106,028.3 16,228.0 147,704.1 22,928.3 134,424.2 22,991.8 112,705.4 19,708.6 74,542.5 12,527.2 48,393.7 8,108.5 1,716,235.0 226,035.7 51,070.5 7,638.1 89,582.4 12,378.0 97,945.4 12,879.8 1,558,122.5 206,772.8 158,112.5 19,262.9 05.000 2,307,240.2 10.000 1,812,942.5 15.000 1,455,685.2 20.000 1,199,403.0 25.000 1,013,084.5 30.000 874,771.1 50.000 571,195.1 35.000 769,722.8 40.000 688,140.0 45.000 623,454.6 Table IV
SUMMARY PROJECTION OF RESERVES AND REVENUE AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 SUMMARY - CERTAIN PROPERTIES ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED INTEREST LOCATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE PROVED + PROBABLE + POSSIBLE (3P) RESERVES NORTH SEA AND IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN PERIOD GROSS RESERVES WORKING INTEREST RESERVES AVERAGE PRICES WORKING INTEREST REVENUE AFTER ROYALTIES ENDING OIL GAS OIL GAS NGL EQUIV OIL GAS NGL OIL GAS NGL TOTAL M-D-Y MBBL MMCF MBBL MMCF MBBL MBOE $/BBL $/MCF $/BBL M$ M$ M$ M$ 12-31-2022 42,104.4 167,296.7 10,876.3 31,628.2 784.3 17,113.7 102.20 33.466 71.89 1,111,597.4 2,226,457.2 12-31-2023 83,951.0 316,982.4 22,380.4 59,209.3 1,563.6 34,152.5 94.11 25.036 66.66 2,106,130.9 3,692,728.4 12-31-2024 89,982.4 280,512.7 23,194.6 56,279.5 1,538.4 34,436.4 83.98 16.127 60.05 1,947,851.9 2,947,835.1 12-31-2025 94,383.9 255,114.7 31,953.9 56,548.5 1,554.2 43,257.8 77.53 12.888 55.37 2,477,507.3 3,292,350.0 12-31-2026 85,307.3 218,662.0 30,057.2 46,291.8 1,256.3 39,294.8 78.57 10.653 55.85 2,361,490.2 2,924,789.8 12-31-2027 74,276.5 194,029.3 23,872.2 39,620.7 1,074.7 31,778.0 79.34 10.837 56.34 1,894,115.6 2,384,034.9 12-31-2028 65,281.6 170,995.2 19,507.1 33,915.9 934.9 26,289.6 81.33 11.039 57.59 1,586,582.9 2,009,832.2 12-31-2029 58,829.7 151,544.5 16,727.0 29,827.9 829.6 22,699.3 82.34 11.257 58.18 1,377,359.1 1,761,403.6 12-31-2030 50,741.9 126,185.4 12,657.3 23,737.2 671.4 17,421.4 84.30 11.362 59.00 1,067,060.9 1,376,371.2 12-31-2031 45,429.1 110,293.7 10,004.5 20,274.7 577.5 14,077.7 86.17 11.532 60.06 862,070.0 1,130,557.5 12-31-2032 38,466.4 93,212.7 7,996.0 15,737.8 429.5 11,138.9 89.31 11.667 61.19 714,139.8 924,032.7 12-31-2033 32,936.1 79,848.5 6,793.8 11,920.3 314.6 9,163.7 91.39 11.759 61.30 620,870.1 780,322.5 12-31-2034 28,882.1 69,918.0 5,988.9 10,672.9 271.8 8,100.9 94.41 11.966 62.85 565,430.3 710,222.0 12-31-2035 25,537.3 63,621.7 5,122.7 9,728.5 249.6 7,049.7 96.55 12.201 64.10 494,597.1 629,297.1 12-31-2036 22,943.8 56,334.7 4,545.7 8,728.7 219.5 6,270.1 99.57 12.439 65.87 452,608.4 575,642.1 SUBTOTAL 839,053.4 2,354,552.0 231,677.6 454,121.8 12,269.9 322,244.3 84.77 15.397 60.25 19,639,412.0 27,365,876.3 REMAINING 106,577.3 99,311.0 17,356.6 14,614.7 306.7 20,183.0 109.55 12.764 70.10 1,901,460.7 2,109,507.3 TOTAL 945,630.7 2,453,863.1 249,034.2 468,736.5 12,576.5 342,427.4 86.50 15.315 60.49 21,540,872.7 29,475,383.5 CUM PROD  8,710,81 ULTIMATE  11,164,67 FUTURE NET REVENUE NET DEDUCTIONS/EXPENDITURES AFTER UK CORPORATE INCOME TAXES PERIOD NUMBER OF TAXES CAPITAL ABDNMNT OPERATING UNDISCOUNTED DISC AT 10.000% PRESENT WORTH PROFILE ENDING ACTIVE COMPLETIONS PRODUCTION INCOME COST COST EXPENSE PERIOD CUM CUM DISC RATE CUM PW M-D-Y GROSS NET M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ % M$ 12-31-2022 207 75.2 0.0 393,927.1 215,088.2 272.4 263,590.1 1,353,579.4 1,353,579.4 1,319,756.5 12-31-2023 223 80.2 0.0 618,694.0 368,048.9 194.4 555,464.4 2,150,326.6 3,503,906.1 3,276,566.5 12-31-2024 238 86.4 0.0 775,809.1 381,815.6 5.9 585,823.0 1,204,381.6 4,708,287.6 4,270,137.3 12-31-2025 252 94.1 0.0 1,387,063.4 321,477.2 0.0 636,828.0 946,981.4 5,655,269.0 4,975,465.7 12-31-2026 255 94.9 0.0 816,873.2 207,923.2 0.0 642,195.6 1,257,797.8 6,913,066.8 5,839,545.1 12-31-2027 256 93.8 0.0 588,821.2 239,722.9 6,560.8 628,241.5 920,688.5 7,833,755.3 6,411,639.3 12-31-2028 252 88.7 0.0 521,939.6 70,964.7 4,155.2 618,775.2 793,997.6 8,627,752.9 6,860,844.0 12-31-2029 244 82.9 0.0 435,348.5 52,476.2 6,224.6 606,132.0 661,222.2 9,288,975.1 7,201,649.5 12-31-2030 242 80.8 0.0 305,664.6 39,787.8 3,582.0 562,623.0 464,713.8 9,753,688.9 7,419,895.1 12-31-2031 237 74.5 0.0 220,859.2 24,945.8 8,776.8 540,789.0 335,186.6 10,088,875.5 7,562,517.3 12-31-2032 228 71.1 0.0 172,598.3 2,010.5 27,647.9 462,564.5 259,211.6 10,348,087.1 7,662,550.1 12-31-2033 188 54.8 0.0 101,814.6 2,291.9 112,276.3 410,859.8 153,079.9 10,501,167.0 7,715,563.2 12-31-2034 180 52.0 0.0 72,088.6 2,429.5 117,658.8 409,532.7 108,512.5 10,609,679.5 7,749,064.9 12-31-2035 175 50.3 0.0 74,187.5 1,959.0 52,354.0 389,209.2 111,587.4 10,721,266.9 7,781,095.7 12-31-2036 169 47.0 0.0 49,349.9 2,427.8 65,328.7 384,131.5 74,404.2 10,795,671.1 7,800,701.7 SUBTOTAL 0.0 6,535,038.8 1,933,369.2 405,037.7 7,696,759.5 10,795,671.1 10,795,671.1 7,800,701.7 REMAINING 0.0 -713,215.9 8,952.5 2,366,209.6 1,515,986.2 -1,068,425.1 9,727,246.0 7,640,053.0 TOTAL OF 25.5 YRS 0.0 5,821,822.9 1,942,321.6 2,771,247.3 9,212,745.7 9,727,246.0 9,727,246.0 7,640,053.0 check All estimates and exhibits herein are art of the NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. BASED ON ESCALATED PRICE AND COST PARAMETERS 907,600.4 92,382.7 1,058,477.2 56,382.6 1,482,367.6 104,229.8 728,792.8 86,049.9 493,142.3 70,157.3 429,368.2 60,551.0 374,410.1 53,839.3 335,772.6 48,271.8 269,695.6 39,614.6 233,799.5 34,688.1 183,612.2 26,280.8 140,165.4 19,287.0 7,178,741.7 760,769.1 127,710.9 17,080.8 118,700.4 15,999.6 108,578.7 14,455.0 6,992,194.1 739,270.2 186,547.6 21,498.9 05.000 8,648,742.2 10.000 7,640,053.0 15.000 6,805,122.4 20.000 6,132,296.4 25.000 5,589,526.7 30.000 5,147,096.3 50.000 3,993,724.4 35.000 4,781,659.4 40.000 4,475,718.8 45.000 4,216,295.5 Table V
SUMMARY PROJECTION OF RESOURCES AND CASH FLOW AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 SUMMARY - CERTAIN PROPERTIES ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED INTEREST LOCATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE LOW ESTIMATE (1C) CONTINGENT RESOURCES NORTH SEA AND IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN PERIOD GROSS RESOURCES WORKING INTEREST RESOURCES AVERAGE PRICES WORKING INTEREST REVENUE AFTER ROYALTIES ENDING OIL GAS OIL GAS NGL EQUIV OIL GAS NGL OIL GAS NGL TOTAL M-D-Y MBBL MMCF MBBL MMCF MBBL MBOE $/BBL $/MCF $/BBL M$ M$ M$ M$ 12-31-2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0 0.0 12-31-2023 349.0 2,327.0 13.2 139.5 4.7 42.0 96.00 24.956 63.84 1,264.7 5,050.0 12-31-2024 3,978.2 14,028.2 1,304.6 4,587.9 67.0 2,162.6 84.00 16.429 62.26 109,587.1 189,135.5 12-31-2025 11,115.0 32,327.4 6,424.4 13,019.3 140.1 8,809.1 77.89 13.152 57.69 500,420.3 679,729.5 12-31-2026 22,788.7 59,241.7 9,284.0 24,359.6 99.5 13,583.5 78.70 10.850 59.95 730,646.6 1,000,922.2 12-31-2027 41,467.1 91,657.1 10,746.8 34,690.3 175.9 16,903.7 79.68 10.952 59.84 856,342.2 1,246,802.0 12-31-2028 44,950.1 79,912.2 14,112.1 30,488.6 133.9 19,502.6 81.79 11.208 61.28 1,154,284.0 1,504,212.9 12-31-2029 45,923.4 67,161.5 17,166.0 26,088.9 82.0 21,746.1 82.90 11.477 61.79 1,423,062.9 1,727,545.0 12-31-2030 38,083.7 50,219.0 14,233.9 18,325.1 10.2 17,403.6 84.95 11.522 62.67 1,209,136.5 1,420,908.9 12-31-2031 29,957.0 43,889.5 10,871.6 16,562.9 8.9 13,736.2 86.92 11.597 64.12 944,976.5 1,137,630.9 12-31-2032 23,615.2 38,047.9 8,084.7 15,154.2 1.4 10,698.9 89.87 11.688 66.33 726,531.5 903,752.9 12-31-2033 18,701.8 33,921.4 6,251.3 13,938.5 0.0 8,654.5 91.84 11.841 0.00 574,128.5 739,178.5 12-31-2034 15,720.4 28,014.5 5,231.1 11,558.9 0.0 7,224.0 94.81 12.127 0.00 495,942.2 636,113.0 12-31-2035 13,102.3 22,823.0 4,358.5 9,398.6 0.0 5,979.0 96.79 12.428 0.00 421,866.4 538,672.3 12-31-2036 10,305.5 19,332.0 3,425.9 8,124.4 0.0 4,826.6 99.80 12.913 0.00 341,911.0 446,820.9 SUBTOTAL 320,057.6 582,902.5 111,508.0 226,436.7 723.6 151,272.4 85.11 11.671 60.28 9,490,100.2 12,176,474.5 REMAINING 27,220.5 58,691.1 13,656.4 27,200.1 0.0 18,346.1 112.08 13.936 0.00 1,530,616.1 1,909,670.8 TOTAL 347,278.0 641,593.6 125,164.4 253,636.8 723.6 169,618.5 88.05 11.914 60.28 11,020,716.3 14,086,145.3 CUM PROD .0  ULTIMATE 347,  FUTURE NET CASH FLOW NET DEDUCTIONS/EXPENDITURES AFTER UK CORPORATE INCOME TAXES PERIOD NUMBER OF TAXES CAPITAL ABDNMNT OPERATING UNDISCOUNTED DISC AT 10.000% DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW PROFILE ENDING ACTIVE COMPLETIONS PRODUCTION INCOME COST COST EXPENSE PERIOD CUM CUM DISC RATE CASH FLOW M-D-Y GROSS NET M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ % M$ 12-31-2022 0 0.0 0.0 -40,294.4 89,543.0 0.0 0.0 -49,248.7 -49,248.7 -48,157.4 12-31-2023 1 0.1 0.0 -351,473.9 547,739.5 -5,502.5 282.0 -185,995.0 -235,243.7 -206,957.3 12-31-2024 7 2.5 0.0 -147,479.5 720,181.8 -1,978.8 3,746.3 -385,334.4 -620,578.0 -522,390.9 12-31-2025 16 9.1 0.0 -202,476.9 782,461.6 3,728.3 35,679.8 60,336.6 -560,241.5 -480,110.6 12-31-2026 34 14.2 0.0 -159,585.6 685,880.6 -3,456.2 134,560.3 343,523.1 -216,718.4 -247,491.6 12-31-2027 42 17.7 0.0 -97,274.3 745,418.8 -38,983.9 278,538.2 359,103.2 142,384.8 -22,941.9 12-31-2028 52 23.3 0.0 270,400.2 327,201.9 -569.6 276,246.7 630,933.7 773,318.5 328,881.6 12-31-2029 57 25.1 0.0 400,249.5 122,304.7 4,177.0 266,898.2 933,915.6 1,707,234.1 809,415.8 12-31-2030 56 22.3 0.0 340,762.8 143,241.3 -26,931.0 168,722.8 795,113.1 2,502,347.2 1,181,586.2 12-31-2031 56 20.3 0.0 269,068.4 137,327.4 -51,277.5 154,686.4 627,826.2 3,130,173.4 1,449,238.3 12-31-2032 64 21.3 0.0 219,176.5 25,184.6 34,210.3 169,629.1 455,552.4 3,585,725.8 1,625,749.9 12-31-2033 66 21.5 0.0 163,280.0 14,679.0 75,241.2 161,085.5 324,892.7 3,910,618.5 1,740,702.3 12-31-2034 70 22.5 0.0 125,169.4 19,411.5 85,099.6 155,202.8 251,229.7 4,161,848.2 1,821,504.2 12-31-2035 65 16.6 0.0 124,648.8 16,193.5 30,028.9 145,063.9 222,737.1 4,384,585.3 1,886,118.7 12-31-2036 66 17.3 0.0 54,292.9 77,431.4 31,393.2 158,976.6 124,726.8 4,509,312.1 1,918,985.4 SUBTOTAL 0.0 968,463.8 4,454,200.7 135,179.1 2,109,318.7 4,509,312.1 4,509,312.1 1,918,985.4 REMAINING 0.0 -238,358.9 0.0 1,133,009.9 1,123,232.9 -108,213.0 4,401,099.1 1,958,529.3 TOTAL OF 25.4 YRS 0.0 730,105.0 4,454,200.7 1,268,189.0 3,232,551.6 4,401,099.1 4,401,099.1 1,958,529.3 check All estimates and exhibits herein are art of the NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. BASED ON ESCALATED PRICE AND COST PARAMETERS 75,376.6 4,171.8 0.0 0.0 3,482.2 303.2 171,227.7 8,081.5 264,308.5 5,967.1 379,935.4 10,524.4 341,726.0 8,203.0 299,416.1 5,066.0 211,134.7 637.7 192,083.1 571.2 177,129.5 92.0 165,050.0 0.0 3,021,811.1 43,618.0 140,170.8 0.0 116,805.8 0.0 104,910.0 0.0 2,642,756.3 43,618.0 379,054.8 0.0 05.000 2,952,775.1 10.000 1,958,529.3 15.000 1,301,225.3 20.000 864,374.9 25.000 569,313.2 30.000 366,487.7 50.000 1,064.8 35.000 224,822.8 40.000 124,539.8 45.000 52,793.3 Table VI
SUMMARY PROJECTION OF RESOURCES AND CASH FLOW AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 SUMMARY - CERTAIN PROPERTIES ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED INTEREST LOCATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE BEST ESTIMATE (2C) CONTINGENT RESOURCES NORTH SEA AND IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN PERIOD GROSS RESOURCES WORKING INTEREST RESOURCES AVERAGE PRICES WORKING INTEREST REVENUE AFTER ROYALTIES ENDING OIL GAS OIL GAS NGL EQUIV OIL GAS NGL OIL GAS NGL TOTAL M-D-Y MBBL MMCF MBBL MMCF MBBL MBOE $/BBL $/MCF $/BBL M$ M$ M$ M$ 12-31-2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0 0.0 12-31-2023 486.6 3,244.3 18.4 194.5 6.6 58.5 96.00 24.956 63.84 1,763.3 7,040.8 12-31-2024 3,179.1 8,566.7 417.1 1,405.0 17.7 677.0 83.19 17.181 60.33 34,694.3 59,902.4 12-31-2025 18,443.1 72,989.3 7,998.8 19,973.3 191.1 11,633.6 77.88 13.599 57.64 622,936.8 905,578.7 12-31-2026 35,948.8 94,459.3 14,693.3 33,205.0 126.9 20,545.2 78.75 10.768 58.92 1,157,083.3 1,522,103.1 12-31-2027 57,601.9 128,328.4 15,870.7 42,946.5 77.6 23,352.8 79.72 10.865 59.92 1,265,238.8 1,736,493.5 12-31-2028 60,667.4 108,627.2 18,996.4 37,521.4 51.1 25,516.7 81.80 11.095 61.71 1,553,919.1 1,973,368.7 12-31-2029 64,975.0 100,145.4 24,285.1 37,147.3 95.1 30,784.9 82.80 11.441 62.91 2,010,927.4 2,441,917.6 12-31-2030 64,200.3 92,008.3 25,783.0 36,787.1 166.0 32,291.6 84.86 11.670 63.64 2,187,858.6 2,627,746.3 12-31-2031 56,092.4 78,536.6 21,616.2 31,055.1 89.3 27,059.8 86.85 11.840 65.48 1,877,332.8 2,250,877.3 12-31-2032 45,426.5 64,767.9 16,078.7 25,013.8 19.3 20,410.7 89.80 11.930 71.24 1,443,817.9 1,743,606.2 12-31-2033 37,097.6 54,991.0 12,619.1 21,327.7 0.4 16,296.7 91.88 11.938 71.12 1,159,383.7 1,414,017.1 12-31-2034 31,827.6 50,268.1 10,587.6 19,871.4 0.3 14,014.1 94.81 12.148 73.43 1,003,809.3 1,245,240.6 12-31-2035 26,768.5 41,875.9 8,454.9 16,389.0 0.1 11,280.6 96.74 12.461 74.98 817,915.0 1,022,136.3 12-31-2036 22,209.5 35,334.6 6,846.3 13,842.6 0.0 9,232.9 99.74 12.930 0.00 682,817.9 861,809.4 SUBTOTAL 524,924.4 934,142.9 184,265.4 336,679.6 841.5 243,155.1 85.85 11.705 61.33 15,819,498.1 19,811,838.0 REMAINING 151,955.5 182,818.7 47,909.0 61,588.9 0.0 58,527.8 122.41 15.092 0.00 5,864,650.0 6,794,169.9 TOTAL 676,879.8 1,116,961.6 232,174.4 398,268.5 841.5 301,682.9 93.40 12.229 61.33 21,684,148.1 26,606,007.9 CUM PROD 0.0 0.0 ULTIMATE 676,879.8 1,116,961.6 FUTURE NET CASH FLOW NET DEDUCTIONS/EXPENDITURES AFTER UK CORPORATE INCOME TAXES PERIOD NUMBER OF TAXES CAPITAL ABDNMNT OPERATING UNDISCOUNTED DISC AT 10.000% DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW PROFILE ENDING ACTIVE COMPLETIONS PRODUCTION INCOME COST COST EXPENSE PERIOD CUM CUM DISC RATE CASH FLOW M-D-Y GROSS NET M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ % M$ 12-31-2022 0 0.0 0.0 -40,294.4 89,543.0 0.0 0.0 -49,248.7 -49,248.7 -48,157.4 12-31-2023 1 0.1 0.0 -346,509.5 506,388.2 0.0 362.2 -153,200.1 -202,448.8 -176,791.3 12-31-2024 5 1.0 0.0 -302,709.9 939,912.0 0.0 3,555.8 -580,855.6 -783,304.4 -647,758.8 12-31-2025 21 10.4 0.0 -622,645.7 890,892.5 -5,724.8 48,285.8 594,771.0 -188,533.4 -208,311.0 12-31-2026 40 16.3 0.0 86,118.5 697,233.1 -419.7 123,104.2 616,067.0 427,533.6 209,211.0 12-31-2027 44 17.7 0.0 159,296.4 734,620.4 -2,378.0 205,337.0 639,617.8 1,067,151.4 610,647.6 12-31-2028 57 24.2 0.0 450,130.8 469,752.9 3,998.8 210,375.9 839,110.4 1,906,261.8 1,081,305.9 12-31-2029 67 31.1 0.0 686,349.9 364,734.9 -2,644.9 306,963.1 1,086,514.7 2,992,776.4 1,639,077.4 12-31-2030 76 34.6 0.0 850,244.3 158,747.3 -36,373.1 354,956.8 1,300,170.8 4,292,947.2 2,246,518.3 12-31-2031 77 34.9 0.0 710,074.7 137,327.4 3,168.5 313,737.3 1,086,569.4 5,379,516.7 2,710,490.5 12-31-2032 81 32.8 0.0 569,658.3 25,184.6 24,848.2 265,492.6 858,422.5 6,237,939.2 3,042,683.5 12-31-2033 80 31.5 0.0 491,361.8 14,679.0 -51,187.5 219,543.5 739,620.2 6,977,559.4 3,302,619.7 12-31-2034 82 31.3 0.0 420,769.3 19,411.5 -47,509.2 218,230.1 634,338.9 7,611,898.3 3,505,186.4 12-31-2035 75 24.6 0.0 280,225.2 16,193.5 97,302.0 205,473.6 422,942.0 8,034,840.3 3,628,859.9 12-31-2036 75 25.1 0.0 183,795.0 77,431.4 100,828.4 211,821.0 287,933.6 8,322,773.9 3,705,443.7 SUBTOTAL 0.0 3,575,864.8 5,142,051.8 83,908.6 2,687,238.9 8,322,773.9 8,322,773.9 3,705,443.7 REMAINING 0.0 736,733.3 0.0 1,608,360.5 3,344,628.2 1,104,447.9 9,427,221.8 3,994,985.5 TOTAL OF 40.9 YRS 0.0 4,312,598.1 5,142,051.8 1,692,269.0 6,031,867.1 9,427,221.8 9,427,221.8 3,994,985.5 check All estimates and exhibits herein are art of the NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. BASED ON ESCALATED PRICE AND COST PARAMETERS 24,138.7 1,069.4 0.0 0.0 4,854.9 422.7 271,625.6 11,016.3 357,542.2 7,477.6 466,607.6 4,647.1 416,295.9 3,153.7 425,009.5 5,980.7 429,322.1 10,565.5 367,698.9 5,845.6 298,414.2 1,374.1 254,602.6 30.7 4,870,245.5 51,614.3 241,406.1 25.2 204,215.7 5.6 178,991.5 0.0 3,940,725.6 51,614.3 929,519.9 0.0 05.000 6,091,449.6 10.000 3,994,985.5 15.000 2,705,167.1 20.000 1,882,466.0 25.000 1,337,281.2 30.000 964,040.4 50.000 271,404.3 35.000 701,537.6 40.000 512,743.6 45.000 374,396.3 Table VII
SUMMARY PROJECTION OF RESOURCES AND CASH FLOW AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 SUMMARY - CERTAIN PROPERTIES ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED INTEREST LOCATED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE HIGH ESTIMATE (3C) CONTINGENT RESOURCES NORTH SEA AND IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN PERIOD GROSS RESOURCES WORKING INTEREST RESOURCES AVERAGE PRICES WORKING INTEREST REVENUE AFTER ROYALTIES ENDING OIL GAS OIL GAS NGL EQUIV OIL GAS NGL OIL GAS NGL TOTAL M-D-Y MBBL MMCF MBBL MMCF MBBL MBOE $/BBL $/MCF $/BBL M$ M$ M$ M$ 12-31-2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.0 0.0 12-31-2023 532.3 3,548.4 20.1 212.8 7.2 64.0 96.00 24.956 63.84 1,928.5 7,700.7 12-31-2024 3,940.7 10,163.0 534.7 1,819.1 20.5 868.8 83.06 17.244 60.57 44,408.1 77,019.1 12-31-2025 25,332.2 67,954.3 8,881.4 14,958.5 71.7 11,532.1 77.97 14.217 58.33 692,524.7 909,365.5 12-31-2026 49,696.4 118,056.8 19,286.3 41,064.4 246.2 26,612.6 78.87 10.826 58.56 1,521,158.3 1,980,144.7 12-31-2027 78,070.5 166,345.6 22,581.0 56,134.7 158.6 32,418.0 79.69 10.789 59.44 1,799,527.1 2,414,582.6 12-31-2028 84,792.9 157,800.0 27,238.2 54,538.6 106.2 36,747.6 81.74 11.057 61.12 2,226,359.0 2,835,891.9 12-31-2029 93,371.6 142,943.7 34,298.2 51,501.3 74.1 43,251.8 82.82 11.351 62.10 2,840,689.5 3,429,881.4 12-31-2030 91,480.4 136,151.5 33,454.2 48,201.2 73.6 41,838.3 84.79 11.612 64.79 2,836,424.7 3,400,899.4 12-31-2031 84,502.6 121,314.2 30,760.7 44,017.4 62.9 38,412.8 86.73 11.848 67.18 2,667,823.0 3,193,558.6 12-31-2032 76,178.6 109,714.1 27,811.5 41,777.3 82.0 35,096.5 89.77 12.108 68.57 2,496,575.0 3,008,030.9 12-31-2033 70,325.5 103,892.2 26,707.1 42,200.9 181.7 34,164.8 91.81 12.352 68.50 2,451,950.2 2,985,678.9 12-31-2034 60,580.2 93,086.1 21,086.5 37,543.9 148.6 27,708.1 94.77 12.541 70.73 1,998,309.4 2,479,656.8 12-31-2035 53,330.4 74,627.9 17,602.9 28,591.2 89.4 22,621.8 96.83 12.775 71.70 1,704,500.6 2,076,154.8 12-31-2036 45,881.2 57,710.3 14,806.5 20,337.5 0.5 18,313.5 99.85 13.192 77.30 1,478,461.6 1,746,802.6 SUBTOTAL 818,015.5 1,363,308.2 285,069.3 482,898.8 1,323.2 369,650.9 86.86 11.803 64.12 24,760,639.7 30,545,367.9 REMAINING 335,153.6 386,001.6 84,312.8 104,335.9 0.8 102,302.5 120.30 15.729 80.60 10,143,060.8 11,784,215.9 TOTAL 1,153,169.1 1,749,309.9 369,382.1 587,234.7 1,324.0 471,953.4 94.49 12.501 64.13 34,903,700.6 42,329,583.9 CUM PROD 0.0 0.0 ULTIMATE 1,153,169.1 1,749,309.9 FUTURE NET CASH FLOW NET DEDUCTIONS/EXPENDITURES AFTER UK CORPORATE INCOME TAXES PERIOD NUMBER OF TAXES CAPITAL ABDNMNT OPERATING UNDISCOUNTED DISC AT 10.000% DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW PROFILE ENDING ACTIVE COMPLETIONS PRODUCTION INCOME COST COST EXPENSE PERIOD CUM CUM DISC RATE CASH FLOW M-D-Y GROSS NET M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ M$ % M$ 12-31-2022 0 0.0 0.0 -40,294.4 89,543.0 0.0 0.0 -49,248.7 -49,248.7 -48,157.4 12-31-2023 1 0.1 0.0 -211,004.7 472,961.5 0.0 388.7 -254,644.9 -303,893.5 -270,161.1 12-31-2024 5 1.0 0.0 -752,786.9 919,811.6 0.0 4,013.6 -94,019.2 -397,912.7 -338,456.9 12-31-2025 21 8.7 0.0 -508,971.5 1,001,679.7 0.0 48,640.0 368,017.3 -29,895.4 -70,208.9 12-31-2026 42 16.2 0.0 255,143.8 730,323.5 0.0 143,071.6 851,605.8 821,710.4 504,738.7 12-31-2027 46 17.1 0.0 521,235.1 766,865.0 -5,956.1 230,763.3 901,675.4 1,723,385.8 1,068,076.4 12-31-2028 64 27.3 0.0 792,669.4 525,019.8 -436.6 247,600.9 1,271,038.5 2,994,424.3 1,780,744.5 12-31-2029 78 35.0 0.0 1,085,361.2 370,055.7 -776.2 289,377.8 1,685,863.0 4,680,287.2 2,646,325.8 12-31-2030 78 35.8 0.0 1,142,617.7 191,081.0 429.0 322,988.6 1,743,783.0 6,424,070.2 3,461,321.6 12-31-2031 91 39.8 0.0 1,074,301.5 161,184.6 4,141.9 317,293.2 1,636,637.4 8,060,707.6 4,157,644.1 12-31-2032 97 38.9 0.0 1,040,833.2 54,381.3 -1,662.6 344,731.9 1,569,747.0 9,630,454.6 4,764,358.8 12-31-2033 98 39.6 0.0 1,045,610.1 22,018.6 -37,783.3 383,977.9 1,571,855.6 11,202,310.2 5,317,517.0 12-31-2034 101 39.3 0.0 841,612.9 23,154.6 -23,589.2 372,441.3 1,266,037.3 12,468,347.4 5,722,174.1 12-31-2035 99 37.8 0.0 695,634.9 16,193.5 -3,308.7 321,652.5 1,045,982.6 13,514,330.0 6,026,196.3 12-31-2036 94 35.0 0.0 560,245.6 77,431.4 -9,691.0 266,349.5 852,467.1 14,366,797.1 6,251,689.0 SUBTOTAL 0.0 7,542,208.1 5,421,704.9 -78,632.9 3,293,290.7 14,366,797.1 14,366,797.1 6,251,689.0 REMAINING 0.0 2,237,556.4 0.0 1,818,042.9 4,372,282.1 3,356,334.6 17,723,131.7 6,919,249.3 TOTAL OF 50.0 YRS 0.0 9,779,764.5 5,421,704.9 1,739,410.0 7,665,572.8 17,723,131.7 17,723,131.7 6,919,249.3 check All estimates and exhibits herein are art of the NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. BASED ON ESCALATED PRICE AND COST PARAMETERS 31,368.7 1,242.2 0.0 0.0 5,309.9 462.3 212,659.1 4,181.7 444,567.6 14,418.7 605,628.7 9,426.8 603,039.7 6,493.2 584,593.1 4,598.8 559,709.3 4,765.3 521,510.5 4,225.1 505,833.9 5,622.0 521,280.4 12,448.3 7,340,978.8 84,904.5 470,839.5 10,507.9 365,244.1 6,410.1 268,301.2 39.9 5,699,885.7 84,842.5 1,641,093.1 62.0 05.000 10,806,835.7 10.000 6,919,249.3 15.000 4,636,133.2 20.000 3,222,538.7 25.000 2,306,220.6 30.000 1,689,206.0 50.000 564,403.7 35.000 1,260,371.6 40.000 954,281.8 45.000 730,793.7 Table VIII
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 1.0 OVERVIEW
Page 1 TECHNICAL DISCUSSION UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA AND THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 1.0 OVERVIEW __________________________________________________________________ Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI) has estimated the proved, probable, and possible reserves and future revenue, as of June 30, 2022, to the Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited (referred to herein as "Ithaca") interest in certain oil and gas properties located in the United Kingdom (UK) Sector of the North Sea and in the North Atlantic Ocean. We have also estimated the contingent resources and cash flow, as of June 30, 2022, to the Ithaca interest in certain discoveries located in the UK Sector of the North Sea and in the North Atlantic Ocean. Working interest volumes shown in this report are after deductions for shrinkage to account for processing, fuel, and flare. A summary of interests and license status for the properties evaluated in this Competent Person's Report (report) is shown in Figure 1.1.1. A map of the relative positions of the properties is shown in Figure 1.1.2. The table below shows the operator, primary fluid, Ithaca working interest, and whether a geologic evaluation was performed for each field included in this evaluation. Ithaca Primary Working Geologic Field Group/Area/Field Operator Fluid Interest (%) Evaluation Captain Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil 085.000 Yes Greater Stella Area Stella Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Gas 100.000 Yes Harrier Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil/Gas 100.000 Yes Vorlich Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil 034.000 Yes Abigail Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil/Gas 100.000 Yes Courageous Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil 055.000 Yes Schiehallion Field BP Exploration Operating Company Limited Oil 011.754 No Greater Britannia Area Britannia Field Harbour Energy plc Gas 032.380 No Alder Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Gas 073.684 Yes Brodgar Field Harbour Energy plc Gas 006.250 Yes Callanish Field Harbour Energy plc Oil 016.500 Yes Enochdhu Field Harbour Energy plc Oil 050.000 No MonArb Area Montrose Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Oil 041.026 No Arbroath Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Oil 041.026 No Arkwright Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Oil 041.026 No Brechin Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Oil 041.026 No Cayley Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Gas 041.026 Yes Godwin Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Oil 041.026 No Shaw Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Oil 041.026 Yes Wood Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Oil 041.026 No Mariner Area Mariner Field Equinor UK Limited Oil 008.889 Yes Mariner East Field Equinor UK Limited Oil 008.889 Yes Cadet Field Equinor UK Limited Oil 008.889 Yes
Page 2 Ithaca Primary Working Geologic Field Group/Area/Field Operator Fluid Interest (%) Evaluation Jade and Jade South Fields Harbour Energy plc Gas 025.500 No Cook Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil 061.346 Yes Erskine Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Gas 050.000 Yes Elgin-Franklin Field TotalEnergies E&P U.K. Limited Gas 006.088 Yes Alba Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil 036.670 No Pierce Field Shell UK Exploration & Production Oil/Gas 007.483 Yes Columba Terraces Area B/D Terrace Canadian Natural Resources Limited Oil 005.600 No E Terrace Canadian Natural Resources Limited Oil 008.400 No Cambo Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil 070.000 Yes Rosebank Field Equinor UK Limited Oil 020.000 Yes Tornado Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil 050.000 Yes Marigold Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil 100.000 Yes Fotla Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited Oil/Gas 060.000 Yes Isabella Field TotalEnergies E&P U.K. Limited Oil 010.000 Yes Leverett Field NEO Energy Oil/Gas 015.000 Yes Decommissioning Assets Pickerill Field Perenco UK Ltd Oil 005.217 No Renee Field Hess Corporation Oil 008.500 No Rubie Field Hess Corporation Oil 040.000 No The estimates in this report have been prepared in accordance with the definitions and guidelines set forth in the 2018 Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS) approved by the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) and in accordance with the recommendations of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), as set out in Primary Market Technical Note 619.1 the Guidelines on disclosure requirements under the Prospectus Regulation and Guidance on specialist issuers published by the FCA. As presented in the 2018 PRMS, petroleum accumulations can be classified, in decreasing order of likelihood of commerciality, as reserves, contingent resources, or prospective resources. Different classifications of petroleum accumulations have varying degrees of technical and commercial risk that are difficult to quantify; thus reserves, contingent resources, and prospective resources should not be aggregated without extensive consideration of these factors. During the course of our evaluation, Ithaca provided access to engineering, geologic, and economic data. Data provided included, but were not limited to, well logs, geologic maps, seismic data, well test data, production data, historical price and cost information, and property ownership interests. All data sources were used, as appropriate, for the evaluation of the properties. The reserves and contingent resources in this report have been estimated using deterministic methods; these estimates have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles set forth in the
Page 3 Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the SPE. We used standard engineering and geoscience methods, or a combination of methods, including performance analysis, volumetric analysis, analogy, and reservoir modeling, that we considered to be appropriate and necessary to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines.
1.1 FIGURES
SUMMARY OF INTERESTS AND LICENSE STATUS UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA AND THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Ithaca Working Field Group/Area/Field Operator License (1) Anticipated License Expiration Date (1) Blocks Interest (%) Captain Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.324 Cessation of Production 13/22a ALL 85.000 P.2513 11-30-2026 (Second Term End) 11-30-2044 (License End) 13/21b, 13/22b 100.000 Greater Stella Area Stella Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.11 Cessation of Production 30/6a D, 29/10a C 100.000 Harrier Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.11 Cessation of Production 30/6a D, 29/10a C 100.000 Vorlich Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.363 Cessation of Production 30/1c LOWER 50.000 30/1c UPPER 20.000 P.1588 02-11-2035 (License End) 30/1f ALL 100.000 Abigail Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.1665 02-11-2035 (License End) 29/10b ALL 100.000 Courageous Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.2397 09-30-2022 (License Relinquished) (2) 30/1e ALL, 30/2e ALL 55.000 Schiehallion Field BP Exploration Operating Company Limited P.556 06-13-2033 (License End) 204/20a (3.1) 11.754 (3) P.559 Cessation of Production 204/25a 11.754 Greater Britannia Area Britannia Field Harbour Energy plc P.103 Cessation of Production 15/30a S-BRI 33.030 15/30a L-RST 50.634 P.119 Cessation of Production 15/29a AREA B, 15/29a AREA C 75.000 P.213 Cessation of Production 16/26a B-BRI, 16/26a D-BEL 33.167 P.345 Cessation of Production 16/27b AREA A, 16/27b AREA B 33.750 P.225 Cessation of Production 16/27c - Alder Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.119 Cessation of Production 15/29a ALDER, 15/29a AREA A 73.684 Brodgar Field Harbour Energy plc P.118 Cessation of Production 21/3a ALL 6.250 P.741 06-13-2027 (License End) 21/3b - P.2350 09-30-2024 (Initial Term End) 09-30-2028 (Second Term End) 09-30-2045 (License End) 21/4c - Callanish Field Harbour Energy plc P.347 Cessation of Production 21/4a ALL 13.700 P.590 06-03-2023 (License End) 15/29b ALL 20.000 Enochdhu Field Harbour Energy plc P.103 Cessation of Production 21/5a ALL 50.000 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 1.1.1 Page 1 of 4
SUMMARY OF INTERESTS AND LICENSE STATUS UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA AND THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Ithaca Working Field Group/Area/Field Operator License (1) Anticipated License Expiration Date (1) Blocks Interest (%) MonArb Area Montrose Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK P.19, P.20 Cessation of Production 22/17n, 22/18n 41.026 Arbroath Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK P.19, P.291, P.292 Cessation of Production 22/17n, 22/17s, 22/18a, 22/22a 41.026 Arkwright Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK P.291 Cessation of Production 22/23a 41.026 Brechin Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK P.291 Cessation of Production 22/23a 41.026 Cayley Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK P.291 Cessation of Production 22/17s 41.026 Godwin Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK P.19, P.291 Cessation of Production 22/17s, 22/17n 41.026 Shaw Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK P.291 Cessation of Production 22/22a 41.026 Wood Field Repsol Sinopec Resources UK P.292 Cessation of Production 22/18a 41.026 Mariner Area Mariner Field Equinor UK Limited P.335 Cessation of Production 9/11a 8.889 P.979 12-22-2034 (License End) 9/11c 8.889 P.2151 11-30-2022 (Second Term End) 11-30-2040 (License End) 9/11g 8.889 Mariner East Field Equinor UK Limited P.726 03-30-2023 (Second Term End) 06-13-2027 (License End) 9/11b 8.889 Cadet Field Equinor UK Limited P.1758 01-09-2037 (License End) 8/15a 8.889 Jade and Jade South Fields Harbour Energy plc P.672 07-19-2025 (License End) 30/2c JADE, 30/7b ALL 25.500 P.1589 02-11-2035 (License End) 30/7b ALL 25.500 Cook Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.185 Cessation of Production 21/20a ALL 61.346 Erskine Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.57 Cessation of Production 23/26a AREA B, 23/26b AREA B 50.000 P.264 Cessation of Production 23/26b AREA C, 23/26d AREA C 50.000 Elgin-Franklin Field TotalEnergies E&P U.K. Limited P.188 Cessation of Production 22/30b ELGN 6.088 P.362 Cessation of Production 29/5b ALL 6.088 P.666 07-19-2025 (License End) 22/30c ALL, 29/5c ALL 6.088 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 1.1.1 Page 2 of 4
SUMMARY OF INTERESTS AND LICENSE STATUS UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA AND THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Ithaca Working Field Group/Area/Field Operator License (1) Anticipated License Expiration Date (1) Blocks Interest (%) Alba Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.213 Cessation of Production 16/26a A-ALB 36.670 16/26a C-10K 21.850 P.2373 09-30-2026 (Second Term End) 09-30-2044 (License End) 22/1b ALL 60.000 Pierce Field Shell UK Exploration & Production P.111 Cessation of Production 23/22a ALL 7.483 P.114 Cessation of Production 23/27a - Columba Terraces Area B/D Terrace Canadian Natural Resources Limited P.199, P.203 Cessation of Production 3/7a, 3/8a 5.600 E Terrace Canadian Natural Resources Limited P.203 Cessation of Production 3/7a 8.400 Cambo Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.1028 03-31-2024 (Second Term End) 05-31-2037 (License End) 204/9a, 204/10a 70.000 P.1189 03-31-2024 (Second Term End) 11-30-2030 (License End) 204/4a, 204/5a 70.000 Rosebank Field Equinor UK Limited P.1026 05-31-2024 (Second Term End) 05-31-2037 (License End) 213/26b, 213/27a 20.000 P.1191 05-31-2024 (Second Term End) 11-30-2030 (License End) 205/1a 20.000 P.1272 05-31-2024 (Second Term End) 12-21-2031 (License End) 205/2a 20.000 Tornado Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.2403 09-30-2026 (Initial Term End) 09-30-2030 (Second Term End) 09-30-2048 (License End) 204/13,14d 50.000 Marigold Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.2158 11-30-2022 (Second Term End) 11-30-2040 (License End) 15/18b ALL 100.000 Fotla Field Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited P.2373 09-30-2026 (Second Term End) 09-30-2044 (License End) 22/1b 60.000 Isabella Field TotalEnergies E&P U.K. Limited P.1820 09-30-2025 (Second Term End) 01-09-2037 (License End) 30/11a, 30/12d 10.000 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 1.1.1 Page 3 of 4
SUMMARY OF INTERESTS AND LICENSE STATUS UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA AND THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Ithaca Working Field Group/Area/Field Operator License (1) Anticipated License Expiration Date (1) Blocks Interest (%) Leverett Field NEO Energy P.118 Cessation of Production 21/3a (4.1) 25.000 (4) P.2350 09-30-2024 (Initial Term End) 09-30-2028 (Second Term End) 09-30-2045 (License End) 21/2d - Decommissioning Assets (5) Pickerill Field Perenco UK Ltd N/A - 48/11a 5.217 Renee Field Hess Corporation N/A - 15/27a 8.500 Rubie Field Hess Corporation N/A - 15/28b 40.000 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) These assets do not have active licenses because they are not producing, and it is our understanding that the operators have no plans to produce them in the future. It is our understanding that Ithaca owns a 25.000 percent interest in Block 21/3a. It is also our understanding that this block is expected to be unitized with other blocks in which Ithaca does not own an interest, and that Ithaca is expected to own a 15.000 percent interest in the resulting unitized field. It is our understanding that Schiehallion Field has been unitized, and that Ithaca owns an 11.754 percent interest in the unitized field. The anticipated license end dates shown for licenses related to producing fields may be subject to extension. For licenses with multiple terms, the anticipated license end date shown is the date the license will expire if the license progresses to each term on its scheduled date, which depends on the fulfillment of certain obligations required by the North Sea Transition Authority. It is our understanding that Ithaca relinquished license P.2397 for Courageous Field effective September 30, 2022; however, for the purposes of this report, we have used the following anticipated license expiration dates, which we understood to be in effect at the time of our evaluation: September 30, 2024 (Initial Term End), September 30, 2028 (Second Term End), and September 30, 2045 (License End). All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 1.1.1 Page 4 of 4
      Figure 1.1.2
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 2.0 CAPTAIN FIELD
Page 4 2.0 CAPTAIN FIELD ______________________________________________________________ Captain Field is an oil field located in Block 13/22a in the UK Sector of the North Sea, approximately 145 kilometers (km) northeast of Aberdeen in a water depth of approximately 370 feet (ft). Captain Field is shown on the location map in Figure 2.5.1, and it produces oil from four reservoirs: the Upper Captain Sandstone (UCS), the Lower Captain Sandstone (LCS), the Ross Sandstone, and the Burns Sandstone. For each of these reservoirs, the trap is defined by a stratigraphic pinch-out. A summary of certain geologic characteristics and petrophysical parameters for Captain Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) UCS 2,700 Oil 150 30 10 LCS 2,800 Oil 100 31 37 Burns 3,250 Oil 130 29 38 Ross 3,500 Oil 130 28 27 For Captain Field, we used decline curve analysis (DCA), dimensionless response, volumetric analysis, and analogy to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines. A summary of the evaluation methods used by category for Captain Field is shown in the table below. Category Evaluation Methods Producing Wells under Waterflood DCA Producing Wells under Polymer Flood DCA and Dimensionless Response Undeveloped Polymer Flood Groups Analogy Other Upside Opportunities Classified as Reserves Analogy and Volumetric Analysis Other Upside Opportunities Classified as DCA, Dimensionless Response, Volumetric Contingent Resources Analysis, and Analogy Development plans for Captain Field were provided by Ithaca. A summary of the development timing for projects in Captain Field is shown in the table below. Project Timing Class 12th Campaign 2022 Reserves 13th Campaign 2024–2025 Reserves 14th Campaign 2026–2027 Reserves 15th Campaign 2028 Contingent Resources EOR Stage 2 2022–2028 Reserves B26Y Well 2023 Reserves Jurassic Well 2025 Reserves C Far East 2025–2029 Contingent Resources Greater LCS 2029 Contingent Resources Ross-E 2029 Contingent Resources Southern Terrace 2028–2030 Contingent Resources 2.1 OVERVIEW Captain Field was discovered in 1977 and began producing in March 1997. There are currently 42 active wells: 7 water injection, 4 polymer injection, 17 producing under waterflood, and 14 producing under
Page 5 polymer flood. Oil at Captain Field is heavy, with oil gravity ranging from 19 to 21 degrees API; this oil has a relatively low gas-oil ratio (GOR) and an in situ viscosity between 47 and 150 centipoise (cP) at the mean reservoir temperature of 87°F. However, production is possible because of the high in situ permeability, which averages 7 darcies (D), the use of horizontal wells with long lateral lengths, and the water injection program, which began at the onset of production in 1997. Captain Field is divided into three areas: Area A to the west, Area B in the center, and Area C to the east. These areas are shown on the depth structure maps in Figures 2.5.2 and 2.5.3. The initial development targeted Area A and utilized a manned wellhead production and drilling platform facility, WPP-A, tied back to a floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel. Shuttle tankers are used for offshore loading of the Captain Field crude oil. A second wellhead platform bridge-linked to WPP-A was installed in 2000. A subsea manifold called the Unitised Template Manifold (UTM), christmas trees, wellheads, and control systems were installed in May 2000 to allow for the commissioning and commencement of development drilling in Area B during the summer of 2000. In June 2005, Chevron North Sea Limited (Chevron) began development of Captain Area C. Two production wells were drilled initially, and first production from the area occurred in July 2006. The wells are tied back to an extension mini-manifold attached to the UTM. Area A wells have electric submersible pumps (ESPs) installed. Because of the local gas cap, Area B wells use hydraulic submersible pumps for pumping the multi-phase fluids. An enhanced oil recovery (EOR) project of polymerized water injection is being deployed in the field. Some initial facilities were included in the original design to facilitate a polymer injection project. Captain Field produces from the UCS, the LCS, and the Ross and Burns Sandstones (collectively referred to as Ross). Depth structure maps on the tops of the UCS and LCS are shown in Figures 2.5.2 and 2.5.3, respectively. The UCS can be divided into two distinct accumulations. The Main accumulation comprises Areas A and B, and the East accumulation comprises Area C. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Captain Field is shown in Figure 2.5.4. Cumulative and recent production for Captain Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir (Area) Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) UCS (Areas A/B) 221,400 46,392 1,138,503 18,546 4,805 250,891 UCS (Area C) 053,269 12,792 0,155,789 04,200 0,843 044,081 LCS 051,131 06,555 0,236,267 02,262 0,563 046,420 Ross 029,343 04,820 0,080,322 - - - Total 355,142 70,559 1,610,881 25,008 6,211 341,392 Totals may not add because of rounding. 2.2 GEOLOGY Captain Field is composed of two related structures, the Main and East accumulations. The trap is further defined by a stratigraphic pinch-out. The principal reservoirs consist of Lower Cretaceous marine turbidites subdivided into the UCS and LCS. The shallow marine Jurassic Ross Sandstone and Jurassic Burns Sandstone are also productive in the field. Type log sections illustrating these formations are shown in Figures 2.5.5 and 2.5.6.
Page 6 2.3 METHODOLOGY Producing Wells Under Waterflood Nearly all active wells that are being produced via waterflood drive have sufficient production history to estimate future production through performance-based analysis. DCA was performed by estimating the total liquid production rate and water-oil ratio (WOR), using different trends for the proved (1P), proved plus probable (2P), and proved plus probable plus possible (3P) cases, and then using these values to calculate oil production rates. Terminal water cuts and WORs were determined for the 1P, 2P, and 3P cases from a review of historical terminal rates along with considerations of future operating practices. Producing Wells Under Polymer Flood The first polymer flood pilot test was performed in the Southern Upper Captain Sandstone (SUCS). A dedicated injection well, the 13/22a-C43, was drilled and completed in October 2009. Injectivity tests were performed in October 2010, and continuous polymer injection began in April 2011 and ended in August 2013. There was a material enhancement in oil production rates from the 13/22a-C47 well located to the west of the 13/22a-C43 well, and this initial test was deemed successful. A second pilot test was then initiated in the UCS through an injection well, the 13/22a-C52. Although polymer injection into the 13/22a-C52 well was starting to show a response consistent with predictions, the polymer injection was stopped because of polymer injectivity-related problems. A third pilot test was conducted in the SUCS through the 13/22a-C58 well located to the west of the 13/22a-C43 well. Polymer injection into the 13/22a-C58 well began in July 2015 and ended in February 2021. The observed enhancement in oil production was very favorable. The fourth and final pilot test began in late 2016 with injection into the UCS 13/22a-C60 well, which is located near the 13/22a-C52 well. A positive response was seen in the neighboring production wells, and this polymer injection test was deemed successful. Polymer injection into the 13/22a-C60 well is ongoing. Following the success of the pilot program, additional polymer injection development has been performed in the UCS. Polymer injection began in August 2018 into the 13/22a-C55 well, in May 2019 into the 13/22a-C65 well, and in July 2019 into the 13/22a-C56 well. The polymer flood pilot program and subsequent development programs were evaluated using a dimensionless response approach. Polygons were drawn around the likely polymer sweep areas between each injection well and the neighboring production wells, and the sweep-area hydrocarbon pore volume and stock tank oil initially in-place (STOIIP) were calculated. For the production wells, baseline primary plus secondary oil rate projections were made using DCA. Incremental oil production in excess of the baseline due to polymer injection was calculated as a fraction of STOIIP and plotted against pore volumes of polymer water injected. Representative response curves for the 1P, 2P, and 3P cases were generated based on the most mature observed responses to date. Currently active and future polymer flood plans are primarily based on a repeating strategy of having a horizontal polymer injection well flanked on each side by one or two horizontal production wells. Each of these patterns is considered a polymer flood group (PFG). The existing active PFG reserves estimates are based on extrapolation of current response curves. The more recently activated PFGs are in the early phase of polymer injection and have not progressed as far along the response curve as the more mature flood areas. Therefore, there is more uncertainty regarding the ultimate incremental production attributable to polymer injection for these PFGs. At this stage of the evaluation, we used a similar range of ultimate responses (1P, 2P, and 3P) for the recently activated PFGs
Page 7 as for the undeveloped PFGs. The estimates were also compared to Ithaca's UCS polymer simulation runs and were found to be in reasonable agreement. Undeveloped Polymer Flood Groups Reserves for undeveloped PFGs have been estimated based on the representative response curves described above. For each PFG, the representative response curves were further adjusted to account for the estimated oil saturation within the group area at the estimated onset of polymer injection operations. PFG areas that have undergone less water flooding because of timing or lower well density will have higher average oil saturation when injection starts. For these areas, the ultimate incremental responses of the representative response curves have been commensurately increased. The future polymer flood programs include a number of new PFGs in Areas A, B, and C. Some new PFGs include new drillwells that are expected to produce from unswept or underswept areas. For each future PFG volumes estimate, incremental polymer flood production estimates based on dimensionless analogy to the pilot areas were combined with new well production to calculate an ultimate recovery factor for each case. Aggregated ultimate production was then compared to calculated in-place volumes to check ultimate recovery factors against pilot area performance. Other Upside Opportunities Classified as Reserves We have estimated reserves for two additional undeveloped projects in Ithaca's Captain Field Development Plan (FDP). In UCS Area A, two "edge" locations have been identified that target relatively underswept areas. One location, known as the UM118P, is located north of the 13/22a-C68 well, and reserves have been estimated similarly to the reserves for that well. The other location, known as the UM150P, is located south of the 13/22a-C64 well, and reserves have been estimated similarly to reserves for other new drillwells in underswept areas. The second additional undeveloped reserves project is the drilling of one waterflood infill well into the Ross. Reserves for this project have been estimated using volumetric analysis and analogy. Other Upside Opportunities Classified as Contingent Resources Contingent resources have been estimated for the following six undeveloped projects in Ithaca's Captain FDP: (1) Extending the polymer flood program to an area known as C Far East, located east of the currently planned Area C polymer floods, (2) Drilling a new horizontal injection well-production well pair close to a former production well in the LCS East area that had inadequate pressure support, (3) Drilling an injection well-production well pair to develop a currently unproduced area of the LCS known as the Southern Terrace, (4) Drilling two injection well-production well pairs to develop two areas of the LCS to the east of the currently developed main LCS area; one pair of wells targets the Greater LCS 9a High area, and the other targets the Greater LCS 29 area, (5) Drilling two further infill production wells in the Ross, and
Page 8 (6) Drilling two primary production wells targeting extensions of the UCS to the northwest of Area A known as Area X and Area Y. Contingent resources for extending the polymer flood program described above have been estimated using similar techniques to those described for the reserves polymer flood development areas. Contingent resources for the remaining items have been estimated using volumetric analysis and analogy. 2.4 RESERVES AND CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Captain Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) 12th Campaign 1P 03,818.8 0.0 0.0 03,818.8 12th Campaign 2P 05,063.8 0.0 0.0 05,063.8 12th Campaign 3P 07,043.1 0.0 0.0 07,043.1 13th Campaign 1P 06,953.7 0.0 0.0 06,953.7 13th Campaign 2P 08,984.7 0.0 0.0 08,984.7 13th Campaign 3P 12,205.5 0.0 0.0 12,205.5 14th Campaign 1P 04,926.3 0.0 0.0 04,926.3 14th Campaign 2P 06,526.2 0.0 0.0 06,526.2 14th Campaign 3P 08,609.7 0.0 0.0 08,609.7 EOR Stage 2 1P 22,952.4 0.0 0.0 22,952.4 EOR Stage 2 2P 27,993.1 0.0 0.0 27,993.1 EOR Stage 2 3P 33,395.9 0.0 0.0 33,395.9 B26Y Well 1P 00,035.3 0.0 0.0 00,035.3 B26Y Well 2P 00,144.5 0.0 0.0 00,144.5 B26Y Well 3P 00,419.0 0.0 0.0 00,419.0 Jurassic Well 1P 01,166.9 0.0 0.0 01,166.9 Jurassic Well 2P 02,088.9 0.0 0.0 02,088.9 Jurassic Well 3P 03,311.2 0.0 0.0 03,311.2 We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Captain Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) 15th Campaign (1) 1C (1) 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,000.0 15th Campaign 2C 1,144.6 0.0 0.0 1,144.6 15th Campaign 3C 5,944.0 0.0 0.0 5,944.0
Page 9 Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) C Far East 1) 1C (1) 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,000.0 C Far East 2C 5,489.7 0.0 0.0 5,489.7 C Far East 3C 9,019.7 0.0 0.0 9,019.7 Greater LCS 1) 1C (1) 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,000.0 Greater LCS 2C 2,133.9 0.0 0.0 2,133.9 Greater LCS 3C 4,579.4 0.0 0.0 4,579.4 Ross-E 1) 1C (1) 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,000.0 Ross-E 2C 3,165.3 0.0 0.0 3,165.3 Ross-E 3C 6,029.2 0.0 0.0 6,029.2 Southern Terrace 1) 1C (1) 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,000.0 Southern Terrace 2C 1,082.7 0.0 0.0 1,082.7 Southern Terrace 3C 2,763.9 0.0 0.0 2,763.9 (1) There are no low estimate (1C) contingent resources for Captain Field at the price and cost parameters used in this report.
2.5 FIGURES
                                      Figure 2.5.1
                                  Figure 2.5.2
                  Figure 2.5.3
10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 7 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN CAPTAIN FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 2.5.
                                 Figure 2.5.5
                                  Figure 2.5.6
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 3.0 GREATER STELLA AREA
Page 10 3.0 GREATER STELLA AREA ______________________________________________________ There are five fields that currently make up the Greater Stella Area (GSA). Three fields are actively producing (Stella, Harrier, and Vorlich), one field is under development (Abigail), and one field is classified as contingent resources (Courageous). The fields included in the GSA are shown on the location map in Figure 3.6.1. Stella, Harrier, and Vorlich Fields are currently subsea developments and are tied back to a semi- submersible floating production facility (FPF) known as FPF-1. Abigail and Courageous Fields are planned to be subsea developments. Abigail Field will also be tied back to FPF-1, and it is our understanding that Ithaca's current plans are for Courageous Field to also be tied back to FPF-1. FPF-1 is secured by a 12-point spread mooring system and has fixed risers on the hull and flexible risers to the seabed. The facility has two-stage separation. Oil and gas are exported via pipelines. Nameplate processing capacities are 89 million cubic feet of gas per day (MMCFD), 25 thousand barrels of oil per day (MBOPD), and 22 thousand barrels of water per day (MBWPD). An infrastructure schematic for FPF-1 and its associated fields is shown in Figure 3.6.2. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of the fields included in the GSA is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Stella ASM 09,200 Faulted Four-way Anticline Stella Ekofisk 09,400 Stratigraphic Trap Harrier Maureen 09,800 Stratigraphic Trap Harrier Ekofisk 19,900 Faulted Four-way Anticline Harrier Tor 10,200 Faulted Four-way Anticline Vorlich Sele (S1b) 10,300 Three-way Stratigraphic Trap Abigail Forties 09,400 Stratigraphic Trap Abigail Statfjord 09,750 Faulted Dip Closure Courageous Forties 10,000 Four-way Anticline A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for the fields included in the GSA is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Solution CGR (BBL/MMCF) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Stella ASM Gas - 150 19 21 Stella Ekofisk Gas - 250 26 58 Harrier Maureen Oil 1,500 - 22 10 Harrier Ekofisk Gas - 045 31 34 Harrier Tor Gas - 050 28 20 Vorlich Sele (S1b) Oil 3,200 - 28 32 Abigail Forties Oil/Gas 1,100 150 32 35 Abigail Statfjord Gas - 035 26 34 Courageous Forties Oil 2,000 - 20 50 For the fields included in the GSA, we used DCA, volumetric analysis, and reservoir modeling to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines. A summary of the evaluation methods used for each field included in the GSA is shown in the table below.
Page 11 Field Evaluation Methods Stella DCA Harrier Volumetric Analysis and Reservoir Modeling Vorlich Volumetric Analysis, Analogy, and Reservoir Modeling Abigail Volumetric Analysis, Analogy, and Reservoir Modeling Courageous Volumetric Analysis and Analogy Development plans for the GSA were provided by Ithaca, and a summary of the development timing for projects in the GSA is shown in the table below. Field Project Timing Class Harrier Infill Well 2024 Reserves Harrier 30/06a-10 Behind-Pipe After Producing Zone Contingent Resources Abigail West Well 2022 Reserves Abigail East Well 2024 Contingent Resources Courageous Locations 1 and 2 2023–2024 Contingent Resources Courageous Location 3 2027 Contingent Resources 3.1 STELLA FIELD Stella Field, operated by Ithaca, is located entirely within Block 30/6a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 330 ft. It is located approximately 260 km east of Aberdeen. Stella Field is shown on the location map in Figure 3.6.1, and the field comprises two producing reservoirs. The primary reservoir is the Andrew Sand Member (ASM) of the Lista Formation. The second reservoir is the Ekofisk Formation, which is a chalk underlying the ASM. The field is tied back subsea from two drill centers to the Ithaca-operated FPF-1. Following initial processing on FPF-1, oil is exported via the Norpipe oil pipeline and gas is exported via the Central Area Transmission System (CATS). A summary graph of the gross historical production for Stella Field is shown in Figure 3.6.3. Cumulative and recent production for Stella Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production March 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) ASM 2,772 49,252 0,714 0,671 10,062 133 Ekofisk 0,465 02,436 0,318 0,560 02,642 286 Total 3,237 51,689 1,032 1,232 12,704 419 Totals may not add because of rounding. Geology 3.1.1.1 Andrew Sand Member The Paleocene ASM is the primary reservoir in Stella Field and is a regionally extensive turbidite sequence. The ASM is fairly thin and ranges between 5 and 26 ft thick. The structure is a salt-cored and faulted four- way anticlinal feature with different oil-water contacts (OWCs) within the field. A depth structure on the top of the ASM is shown in Figure 3.6.4.
Page 12 The ASM is at a depth of approximately 9,200 ft true vertical depth subsea (TVDSS) at the crest of the structure and contains a rich gas-condensate with an oil rim. The ASM is relatively thin but has a large column height of approximately 820 ft. A type log section of this formation is shown in Figure 3.6.5. There is evidence of a compositional gradient within the condensate accumulation, which is not surprising because of the large column height. The ASM is broken up into a number of hydrostatically separated fault block compartments. This was apparent from formation test pressure analysis and has subsequently been confirmed with production pressure analysis. Average initial reservoir pressure at an average gas-oil contact (GOC) is approximately 6,700 psia. Reservoir temperature is approximately 250°F. The ASM has been produced by five horizontal production wells. Initially, three flank wells targeted the oil rim and one crestal well targeted the gas cap. An additional flank infill well was drilled in 2019. The drive mechanism in the ASM is principally depletion drive with some moderate natural aquifer pressure support observed from the south and east. Two of the five ASM production wells, the 30/06a-A1Z and 30/06a-A2Z, are no longer producing. 3.1.1.2 Ekofisk Formation The Paleocene Ekofisk Formation is a chalk that also produces in the field, and it is believed to be an underfilled stratigraphic trap. The Ekofisk Formation underlies the ASM at a depth of approximately 9,400 ft TVDSS and contains oil. The Ekofisk Formation has been produced by one horizontal well. Methodology Reserves estimates for Stella Field are based on DCA. All of the Stella Field wells have reasonably well- established production trends. Considering these trends and the relative maturity of the fields, DCA was deemed the most appropriate forecasting method. For each well, DCA projections were made for gas rate and condensate yield. 3.2 HARRIER FIELD Harrier Field, operated by Ithaca, is a gas-condensate field located within Block 30/06a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 330 ft. It is located approximately 260 km east of Aberdeen. Harrier Field is shown on the location map in Figure 3.6.1. Harrier Field comprises two producing chalk reservoir intervals, the Tor and the Ekofisk Formations, at a depth of approximately 10,000 ft TVDSS. Harrier Field has been developed via a single multi-lateral well, the 30/06a-10Z, which simultaneously produces from the Paleocene Ekofisk Formation and the Cretaceous Tor Formation. The well is tied back to FPF-1 via a 9-km pipe-in-pipe flowline connected to the Stella Field main subsea manifold. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Harrier Field is shown in Figure 3.6.6. Cumulative and recent production for Harrier Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Ekofisk/Tor 910 34,470 196 401 15,347 230 Geology Harrier Field is a faulted four-way anticline with three productive pelagic chalk formations: the Paleocene Maureen and Ekofisk Formations and the Cretaceous Tor Formation. The Ekofisk Formation is relatively
Page 13 thick and broken into subunits, of which the E1 and E2 were evaluated for this report. It has a porosity of 23 to 25 percent. The Tor Formation is also broken into subunits, but only the M1 was evaluated for this report, and it is the only gas-bearing subunit. It has a porosity of 20 to 22 percent. The Maureen Formation is a confined, channelized turbidite with seismic amplitude support. It has a porosity of 22 percent and an intial water saturation (Swi) of 10 percent. Type log sections illustrating these formations are shown in Figures 3.6.7 and 3.6.8. A depth structure map on the top of the Tor M1 Formation is shown in Figure 3.6.9. Methodology A petrophysical evaluation was conducted and net pay maps were created as inputs to an independent volumetric analysis. Low and high case net pay maps were created for the Tor M1 Formation, the combined Ekofisk E1/E2 Formation, and the Maureen Formation. A fit-for-purpose simulation model was built to model the Tor and Ekofisk Formations currently being simultaneously produced by the dual lateral 30/06a-10Z well. The model was built using structure maps, and the in-place volumes were adjusted based on our net pay mapping. Well drawdown was used as the primary production constraint, and gas production rate, flowing bottomhole pressure (FBHP), and condensate-gas ratio (CGR) were the history-matching parameters. Key objectives of the relatively simple simulation model were to gain an understanding of the relative production from the Ekofisk and Tor Formations and the likely drainage area. Since the reservoirs have very low permeability, the drainage areas are relatively local. A low case version of the simulation model was created that limited active grid cells to the current effective drainage area. The simulation models were used in prediction mode, continuing the drawdown constraint and adding an FBHP constraint based on the most recently observed FBHP. The predictions were used as guides for the estimated 1P, 2P, and 3P production forecasts for the 30/06a-10Z well. The full area simulation model was also used in prediction mode to assess the potential for an additional well. Reserves estimates for this new well are based on the mapping and the simulation runs. A workover to recomplete the 30/06a-10Z well in the shallower Maureen Formation following depletion of the Tor and Ekofisk Formations has been included in the contingent resources category. Another simple fit-for-purpose simulation model was built to help estimate these resources. As with the Tor/Ekofisk model, the Maureen model was built using structure maps and the in-place volumes were tuned based on our net pay mapping. Since there is no existing production from the Maureen Formation, this model could not be calibrated by history matching. Instead it was used to run a matrix of cases based on ranges of uncertain parameters. The uncertain parameters included OWC, aquifer volume and strength, and absolute effective permeability. The simulation runs were used to guide the low estimate (1C), best estimate (2C), and high estimate (3C) cases of contingent resources production profiles for the workover. Reserves and Contingent Resources by Project We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Harrier Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Infill Well 1P 0,409.4 12,749.0 0,380.2 02,987.7 Infill Well 2P 0,958.0 28,552.1 0,851.6 06,732.3 Infill Well 3P 1,510.9 44,193.7 1,318.1 10,448.6
Page 14 We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Harrier Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) 30/06a-10 Behind-Pipe 1C 1,155.2 1,521.7 045.4 1,463.0 30/06a-10 Behind-Pipe 2C 1,504.0 1,986.3 059.2 1,905.7 30/06a-10 Behind-Pipe 3C 3,005.1 6,061.6 180.8 4,231.0 3.3 VORLICH FIELD Vorlich Field, operated by Ithaca, is a volatile oil field located in Blocks 30/1c and 30/1f in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 300 ft. Vorlich Field is shown on the location map in Figure 3.6.1. The field, located approximately 260 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered in 1984 with the drilling of the 30/01c-3 well, although only approximately 7 ft of pay was encountered. The field was further appraised by the 30/01f-13A, 30/01f-13Z, and 30/01f-13Y wellbores. Two production wells have been drilled and completed, and production commenced in November 2020. The wells are tied back via a 9-km pipe-in-pipe flowline to a new dedicated flexible riser and umbilical connecting the subsea infrastructure to FPF-1. A new module for processing natural gas liquids (NGL) on FPF-1 was installed to maximize liquids production from the field. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Vorlich Field is shown in Figure 3.6.10. Cumulative and recent production for Vorlich Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production March 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Sele (S1b) 4,924 22,090 255 8,694 60,130 699 Geology Vorlich Field is a broad, unfaulted, three-way stratigraphic closure with low dip. The Late Paleocene Sele (S1b) Formation is a distal deep-marine turbidite fan complex that laps onto a paleo high. The average porosity and Swi are approximately 26 percent and 32 percent, respectively. The reservoir is approximately 10,300 ft TVDSS. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 3.6.11. A depth structure map on the top of the S1b Formation is shown in Figure 3.6.12. Methodology Reserves estimates for Vorlich Field are based on volumetric analysis, analogy to similar reservoirs, and reservoir modeling. We mapped the net pay in the reservoir down to the logged OWC in all cases. We used a range of net thickness and top of reservoir structure away from well control to establish the range of potential net rock volumes (NRVs). Because the fluid at Vorlich Field is a near-critical oil, a large portion of the oil in the reservoir flashes to gas at pressures just below the bubble point. Gas produced from Vorlich Field is first processed through the new NGL module at FPF-1, and the residual gas is exported to the Teesside Gas Processing Plant,
Page 15 where additional NGL is extracted. We built a dynamic compositional simulation model and used it to guide our forecasts of the various product sales rates. The gross gas volumes shown in this report for Vorlich Field are the gross (100 percent) gas volumes remaining at the outlet of the offshore NGL processing module; these volumes are before offshore fuel and flare gas consumption is taken into account. This definition of gross gas is consistent with that reported by Ithaca for Vorlich Field. The working interest gas volumes shown in this report for Vorlich Field are after deductions for shrinkage that account for the volume converted to condensate and NGL during onshore processing and after deductions for Vorlich Field's estimated share of the 4.2 MMCFD of gas consumed in field operations at FPF-1. 3.4 ABIGAIL FIELD Abigail Field includes both oil and gas-condensate reservoirs and is located in Block 29/10b in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 300 ft. Abigail Field is shown on the location map in Figure 3.6.1. The field, located approximately 250 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered in 1995 and further appraised in 2012 with the 29/10b-8 well. Before 2021, Abigail Field was known as Hurricane Field. Abigail is a pre-production discovery and part of the larger GSA development. It is our understanding that Abigail Field has been fully sanctioned to proceed with development. A production well has been drilled and completed and subsea infrastructure installed. The current proposed development plan involves two production wells. The first production well, drilled in 2022, twinned the 29/10-4Z well, and a second well will twin the 29/10b-8 well. The wells will share a flowline back to the Stella Main Drill Center (SMDC), which is tied back to FPF-1. Construction of the subsea infrastructure is underway. First oil is expected in October 2022, approximately ten months after field development plan approval, with the second well to come online approximately two years later. Geology Abigail Field logged a productive Paleocene Forties Formation, which consists of channelized turbidites. The narrow channel system is draped over an anticlinal structure. The porosity and Swi are 32 percent and 35 percent, respectively. A type log section illustrating the Forties Formation is shown in Figure 3.6.13, and a depth structure on the top of the formation is shown in Figure 3.6.14. The ASM, which is the Stella Field- equivalent sandstone, was encountered in all five wells in the field. The ASM is usually thin, less than 20 ft; however, the 29/10-4Y well to the northwest logged approximately 50 ft. The porosity is estimated at 26 percent. Methodology Reserves estimates for Abigail Field are based on volumetric analysis, analogy to similar properties, and reservoir modeling. We mapped net pay for the Forties Formation based on structure maps, a logged OWC, and petrophysics from the discovery and appraisal wells. However, no two penetrations of the ASM to date have been in communication, indicating a high degree of compartmentalization and significant uncertainty regarding connectivity over the license block. Given the observed compartmentalization, we did not have confidence in a mapping approach to this reservoir and instead opted to assign a drainage area around each planned completion to arrive at a NRV for each proposed well. We also built an integrated production model of the reservoirs, wells, and subsea flowlines back to the SMDC to understand the impact of commingling Forties Formation and ASM production and to guide our forecasts of the rate profiles over the life of the field.
Page 16 Reserves and Contingent Resources by Project We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Abigail Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) West Well 1P 1,850.6 1,787.3 059.0 2,217.7 West Well 2P 3,300.3 3,187.4 105.2 3,955.0 West Well 3P 5,167.4 4,990.7 164.7 6,192.5 We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Abigail Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) East Well 1C 0,604.7 04,151.9 137.0 1,457.5 East Well 2C 0,811.9 05,987.6 197.6 2,041.9 East Well 3C 1,236.9 11,475.7 378.7 3,594.2 3.5 COURAGEOUS FIELD Courageous Field, operated by Ithaca, is located in Blocks 30/1e and 30/2e in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of 263 ft, approximately 17 km northeast of FPF-1. Courageous Field is shown on the location map in Figure 3.6.1. The field was discovered by the drilling of the 30/02-1 well in 1971. Historically, the field was appraised by Kerr-McGee Corporation and BG Group with seven penetrations and three drillstem tests (DSTs). Development plans are currently being evaluated, and first oil for the field is expected in 2024. The conceptual field development consists of a subsea tieback to FPF-1 of two wells targeting the central and eastern portions of the field from a planned main drill center. Because of the tentative nature and timeline of the development, only contingent resources have been estimated for Courageous Field. Geology The Courageous Field structure is interpreted as a single low-relief four-way closure with no obvious faults observed on the seismic dataset. The primary reservoir is the Paleocene Forties Formation, which is a distal turbidite at approximately 10,000 ft TVDSS. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 3.6.15. Despite the lack of identified compartments, fluid samples and DSTs taken across the field show varying fluid types and OWCs. Reservoir net-to-gross ratio (NTG) distribution is a key uncertainty for evaluation. Average porosity is approximately 20 percent with permeability averaging approximately 20 millidarcies (mD). The Swi is generally high at approximately 50 percent. A depth structure map on the top of the Forties Formation is shown in Figure 3.6.16. Methodology Contingent resources estimates for Courageous Field are based on volumetric analysis and analogy to similar properties. Net pay for the Forties Formation was mapped based on structure maps, logged OWCs,
Page 17 and petrophysical data from the discovery and appraisal wells. The appraisal wells have different fluids and contacts, but there are no apparent features separating them, so our mapping was performed assuming wells were approximately centered in their respective compartments. Location 1 is planned to penetrate the compartments defined by the 30/02a-5 and 30/02a-5Y appraisal wells. Location 2 is planned to penetrate the compartment defined by the 30/02a-9 appraisal well. Location 3 is only included in the 3C case and is planned to penetrate the compartment defined by the 30/02a-9Z appraisal well. In the 1C case, sampled oil discovered at saturated conditions indicates that the 30/02a-5 compartment carries a gas cap from the top of the structure to the highest known oil (HKO). The 30/02a-9 compartment also includes a gas cap in this case, as indicated by a possible DST and repeat formation test (RFT) interpretation of fluid yields and a GOC. In the 2C case, we assume oil fill from the top of the structure to the OWCs. The 3C case is a lognormal extrapolation of in-place resources based on the 1C and 2C cases. Formation volume factors and yields were determined from equation-of-state (EOS) characterizations of all fluids used in the assessment, including four oil samples and one gas-condensate sample. Further, the EOS was used to align all samples to common separator conditions. Hydraulic and material balance (P/Z) models were used to estimate abandonment pressures by representation of commingling at the subsea manifold and pressure losses in the subsea pipeline and riser. Pore volume compressibility was estimated from core samples collected in the 30/02a-5, 30/02-1, and 30/02a-5Z appraisal wells. Fluid compressibility was estimated through the EOS representations. Well productivity indices have been estimated from the 30/02a-5 well measurements from DST 1, normalized for perforated length, and verified against core permeability estimates. Contingent Resources by Project We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Courageous Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Locations 1 and 2 1C 2,330.4 20,952.5 0.0 05,942.9 Locations 1 and 2 2C 2,957.8 25,219.2 0.0 07,306.0 Locations 1 and 2 3C 5,438.8 39,780.5 0.0 12,297.5 Location 3 (1) 1C (1) 0,000.0 00,000.0 0.0 00,000.0 Location 3 (1) 2C (1) 0,000.0 00,000.0 0.0 00,000.0 Location 3 3C 1,124.0 11,446.6 0.0 03,097.5 (1) Our study indicates that as of June 30, 2022, there are no low estimate (1C) or best estimate (2C) contingent resources for the Location 3 project.
3.6 FIGURES
                                                                                       Figure 3.6.1
NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Greater Stella Area Infrastructure Schematic United Kingdom Sector of the North Sea Figure provided by Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited. Figure 3.6.2
10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN STELLA FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 3.6.3
                        Figure 3.6.4
                           Figure 3.6.5
10 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN HARRIER FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 3.6.6
                                     Figure 3.6.7
                            Figure 3.6.8
                                                  Figure 3.6.9
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2020 2021 2022 | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN VORLICH FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 3.6.10
                          Figure 3.6.11
                       Figure 3.6.12
                             Figure 3.6.13
                                                                     Figure 3.6.14
                                     Figure 3.6.15
                                                 Figure 3.6.16
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 4.0 SCHIEHALLION FIELD
Page 18 4.0 SCHIEHALLION FIELD _________________________________________________________ Schiehallion Field, operated by British Petroleum (BP), is an oil field located in Blocks 204/20a, 204/25a, 205/16a, and 205/21b in the North Atlantic Ocean in a water depth of approximately 1,300 ft. Schiehallion Field, located approximately 175 km west of the Shetland Islands, is shown on the location map in Figure 4.4.1. Other partners in the field include Shell UK Exploration & Production (Shell) and Harbour Energy plc (Harbour). Schiehallion Field was discovered by BP in 1993. The final investment decision (FID) was secured for Schiehallion Field in 1996, and the field was brought online in 1998. Schiehallion Field was initially developed with 21 production wells and 23 water injection wells. A redevelopment program was approved in 2011, and in 2012 the field was shut in. The redevelopment program included the manufacturing of the Glen Lyon FPSO and the drilling of 17 additional wells. Drilling commenced in 2016 and the field was brought back online in 2017. Topsides production design capacity is 130,000 barrels of oil per day (BOPD) and 310,000 barrels of water per day (BWPD), with injection capacity up to 570,000 BWPD. Oil is exported via shuttle tankers, and produced gas is exported via pipeline. The Glen Lyon FPSO produces oil and gas from both Schiehallion and Loyal Fields; however, it is our understanding that Ithaca owns no interest in Loyal Field. First production for Schiehallion Field occured in July 1998, and the field reached a sustained rate greater than 100,000 BOPD by the early 2000s. The produced oil is a medium crude oil of approximately 25 degrees API, slightly undersaturated. GORs for the producing wells range from 500 to 1,000 standard cubic feet per stock tank barrel (SCF/STB), and in situ viscosity ranges from 1.5 to 3.5 cP. Schiehallion Field produces from the Vaila Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Schiehallion Field is shown in Figure 4.4.2. Cumulative and recent production for Schiehallion Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production December 2021 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Vaila 424,522 188,353 268,056 39,503 15,353 112,944 4.1 GEOLOGY Schiehallion Field is composed of a series of tilted fault blocks that are separated by east-to-west-trending faults. The field area measures approximately 8 km in length and 8 km in width and is at a depth of approximately 6,500 ft TVDSS. Production comes from a series of sandstones within the late Paleocene- aged Vaila Formation that are configured as both stratigraphic and structural traps. Areal connectivity of the reservoirs varies based on depositional limits and amalgamation within and between channel complexes. The sands were deposited along the middle shelf slope to basin floor by gravity flow mechanisms such as debrites, turbidites, and slumps. Reservoir quality in the field is typically high, with porosities in the main sands ranging from 20 to 35 percent. 3-D seismic data are instrumental in identifying sand geometries within the field, and 4-D seismic data have been used to evaluate changes in hydrocarbon distribution over the producing life of the field. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of Schiehallion Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Vaila 6,500 Structural, Stratigraphic, and Faulted Closures
Page 19 4.2 METHODOLOGY The active wells are being produced via waterflood drive because the surrounding aquifer is insignificant. Most of these wells have sufficient production history to estimate future production using performance- based analysis. DCA was performed for each well by estimating the total liquid production rate and either the WOR or the water cut, using different trends for the 1P, 2P, and 3P cases, and then using these values to calculate the estimated oil production rates. Most of the wells were forecasted using WOR trends. Selection between a WOR and a water cut forecast is based on well groupings on a plot of WOR versus normalized estimated ultimate recovery (EUR). Terminal water cuts and WORs were estimated for the 1P, 2P, and 3P cases from a review of historical terminal rates along with consideration of future operating practices. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for Schiehallion Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Vaila Oil 450 27 25 Reserves have been estimated for the Phase A drilling program, which comprises five additional infill production wells in 2022 and 2023. Long lead authorization for expenditure (AFE) requests have been approved for these five wells. Estimates of reserves for undeveloped locations in the Vaila Formation are based on the operator's estimates. The post-completion estimates of EUR for wells drilled since 2016 aligned closely with the operator's pre-drill estimates. The initial production rates for these wells, meanwhile, were 5 to 10 percent lower than the operator's pre-drill estimates; therefore, we applied reductions accordingly to the operator's estimates of initial production rates for future wells. Contingent resources have been estimated for further planned infill drilling, including the remaining Phase B drilling program (comprising six wells planned to be drilled between 2024 and 2026) and the Phases C and D drilling programs (comprising an additional 15 wells planned to be drilled between 2027 and 2030). The placement of well locations in these drilling programs will be informed by the acquisition of additional 4-D seismic data, and each program is contingent upon the success of preceding infill wells. Because of the size of the accumulation at Schiehallion Field, we expect that the operator will pursue a field life extension project to allow an additional seven years of production of economic resources beyond the initial thirty-year facility design limit of 2047. The facility life extension project is contingent upon field performance and future economic conditions. Estimates of contingent resources associated with further infill drilling of the Vaila Formation are based on creaming curve analysis. The P90, P50, and P10 EURs for all wells produced in Schiehallion Field were ordered based on date drilled, and the EUR trends were extrapolated to arrive at technically recoverable estimates as the basis for our 1C, 2C, and 3C estimates. Because of historical variability in well results, program-level EUR-per-well averages were applied to individual program wells. 4.3 RESERVES AND CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Schiehallion Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Phase A Infill 1P 0,747.3 0,203.5 0.0 0,782.4 Phase A Infill 2P 2,420.5 0,659.0 0.0 2,534.1 Phase A Infill 3P 4,328.7 1,178.5 0.0 4,531.9
Page 20 We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Schiehallion Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Phase B Infill 1C 1,808.9 0,492.5 0.0 1,893.9 Phase B Infill 2C 2,541.5 0,691.9 0.0 2,660.8 Phase B Infill 3C 3,507.9 0,955.0 0.0 3,672.6 Phase C/D Infill 1C 2,086.3 0,568.0 0.0 2,184.3 Phase C/D Infill 2C 3,244.8 0,883.4 0.0 3,397.1 Phase C/D Infill 3C 5,398.0 1,469.6 0.0 5,651.3 Life Extension 1C 0,000.0 0,000.0 0.0 0,000.0 Life Extension 2C 0,188.2 0,088.2 0.0 0,203.4 Life Extension 3C 0,320.3 0,150.2 0.0 0,346.2
4.4 FIGURES
                                                                                       Figure 4.4.1
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN SCHIEHALLION FIELD THE NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 4.4.2 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 5.0 GREATER BRITANNIA AREA
Page 21 5.0 GREATER BRITANNIA AREA ___________________________________________________ The Greater Britannia Area (GBA) consists of Britannia, Alder, Brodgar, Callanish, and Enochdhu Fields. These fields are shown on the Britannia Area location map in Figure 5.6.1. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of each field included in the GBA is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Britannia Britannia 12,750 (1) Alder Galley 14,700 Faulted Four-way Anticline Brodgar Britannia 10,900 Four-way Anticline Callanish Forties 06,500 Four-way Anticline with Stratigraphic Pinch-out Enochdhu Forties 16,900 (1) (1) No geologic evaluation was performed. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for each field included in the GBA is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Solution CGR (BBL/MMCF) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Britannia Britannia Gas - 060 (1) (1) Alder Galley Gas - 115 - - Brodgar Britannia Gas - 050 17 20 Callanish Forties Oil 1,000 - 29 22 Enochdhu Forties Oil 1,000 - (1) (1) (1) No geologic evaluation was performed. For the fields included in the GBA, we used performance analysis, volumetric analysis, analogy, and reservoir modeling to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines. A summary of the evaluation methods used for the fields included in the GBA is shown in the table below. Field Category Evaluation Methods Britannia All DCA Alder All DCA and P/Z Analysis Brodgar All DCA Callanish Reserves DCA Callanish Contingent Resources Volumetrics and Analogy Enochdhu All DCA Development plans for the GBA were provided by Ithaca, and a summary of the development timing for projects in the GBA is shown in the table below. Field Project Timing Class Britannia Compressor Overhaul 2022 Reserves Britannia Well Intervention 2023–2029 Reserves Brodgar Compressor Overhaul 2022 Reserves Callanish F6 Well 2024 Contingent Resources
Page 22 5.1 BRITANNIA FIELD Britannia Field is a gas-condensate field located in Blocks 15/29a, 15/30a, 16/26a, and 16/27b in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of 480 ft, approximately 225 km northeast of Aberdeen. Britannia Field is shown on the location map in Figure 5.6.1. The field covers approximately 250 square km and is operated by Harbour. The field was discovered in 1975, and field development was approved in 1994 with an agreement to develop Blocks 15/30a and 16/26a as one accumulation. A fixed platform was installed in Block 16/26a, and wells were drilled in Block 15/30a that tie back to the platform via a subsea manifold. Sales gas has been produced from the field since 1998. Dry gas is delivered via the dedicated Britannia Gas Pipeline to the Scottish Area Gas Evacuation (SAGE) system, operated by Ancala Midstream Acquisitions Limited (Ancala), for onshore processing at the St. Fergus gas terminal. Condensate is exported through the Forties Pipeline System (FPS), operated by Ineos FPS Limited, for processing at the Grangemouth oil terminal in Scotland. There are currently 35 producing wells. Britannia Field produces from a single reservoir, the Britannia Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Britannia Field is shown in Figure 5.6.2. Cumulative and recent production for Britannia Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production March 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Britannia 76,138 2,114,355 - 1,358 62,118 - Geology Britannia Field spans four UK Continental Shelf blocks and is a combination stratigraphic-structural trap. Britannia Field originally had a 1,400-ft gas column and a 140-ft oil column in Lower Cretaceous deepwater marine sandstones known as the Britannia Formation. The reservoir's characteristics vary throughout the field, ranging from high-quality turbidites to poor-quality debris flows. The reservoir has an average porosity of 15 percent, and NTG ranges from 12 to 58 percent. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 5.6.3. A depth structure map on the top of the Britannia Formation is shown in Figure 5.6.4. Methodology Reserves estimates for the existing producing wells are based on DCA on both gas rate versus time and cumulative gas production bases. Because of well interactions, well forecasts were aggregated and field gas rate versus field cumulative gas plots were also included in the analysis. Recurring well work programs were also considered in estimating reserves. Typical program scopes include running production logs, reperforating wells, and adding tail pipes and velocity strings to optimize producing wells and to reestablish production. Production uplift estimates are based on the historical performance of similar activities in the field. No study was made to determine whether any developed non-producing or undeveloped reserves might be established for Britannia Field. 5.2 ALDER FIELD Alder Field, operated by Ithaca, is a gas-condensate satellite field to Britannia Field (see Section 5.1) and is located in Block 15/29a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of 500 ft. Alder Field is located
Page 23 27 km west of Britannia Field and 199 km northeast of Aberdeen. Alder Field is shown on the Britannia Area location map in Figure 5.6.1. The field was discovered in 1975, and a single subsea gas well, the 15/29a-A1, began producing in 2016. The production is processed at the Britannia platform, and condensate is exported via the FPS for processing at the Grangemouth oil terminal. The gas is exported from the Britannia platform via the SAGE system, operated by Ancala, for onshore processing at the St. Fergus gas terminal. Alder Field has produced from the Galley Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Alder Field is shown in Figure 5.6.5. Cumulative and recent production for Alder Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Galley 6,126 78,863 21 564 11,779 - Geology Alder Field produces from the Jurassic Galley Formation, which is a sandstone containing sand-rich turbidites, at approximately 14,700 ft TVDSS. The reservoir is a combination stratigraphic-structural trap with a shale-out to the north and east and structural dip to the south. The reservoir has an average porosity of approximately 13 percent and an Swi of approximately 20 percent. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 5.6.6. A depth structure map on the top of the Galley A Formation is shown in Figure 5.6.7. Methodology DCA and P/Z estimates have been used to forecast production for the 15/29a-A1 well. First, a P/Z plot was constructed relying on several key shut-in events allowing extended pressure buildups, namely the 2017, 2018, and 2019 turnarounds and an FPS shutdown period at the end of 2017. Equilibrium gas Z-factors were pulled from the 15/29a-8 DST 1 pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) report in the constant composition expansion and constant volume depletion experiments. As two-phase Z-factors were not estimated, only equilibrium gas Z-factors were used. Rock compressibility was included in the P/Z analysis as Alder Field was discovered to be over-pressured. An estimated abandonment pressure was calculated from a hydraulic model representing the flow path from Alder Field to the Britannia platform. Additionally, because of the liquid yield of the produced gas, it was deemed necessary to include the gaseous equivalent volumes of liquid in the P/Z plot. Remaining gas and liquid recoveries have been estimated assuming constant liquid yield because of the maturity of the field. A range in remaining recoverable volumes was generated through various fits through the P/Z plot, with the 1P estimate honoring the early and middle time data and the 2P and 3P estimates honoring the early time data with a range of rock compaction influence. DCA was constructed to honor the P/Z-derived EUR while matching the historical field rates on rate-versus- time and rate-versus-cumulative gas bases. No study was made to determine whether developed non-producing reserves, undeveloped reserves, or contingent resources might be established for Alder Field. A second productive area, the DAB Fault Block, was discovered near the 15/29a-3 well to the south of the currently producing area. Fluid properties and a logged gas-water contact (GWC) indicated isolation from the producing A1 compartment. Successive DST results from the 15/29a-3 well showed progressively lower extrapolated buildup pressures. The resulting P/Z calculations indicated the potential for a very small
Page 24 connected drainage area. It is our understanding that Ithaca has no plans for future activities or to further study or appraise this area; therefore, contingent resources have not been estimated for Alder Field. 5.3 BRODGAR FIELD Brodgar Field, operated by Harbour, is a gas-condensate satellite field to Britannia Field (see Section 5.1) and is located in Blocks 21/3a and 21/3b in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of 450 ft. Brodgar Field is shown on the location map in Figure 5.6.1. The field, located 41 km southwest of Britannia Field and approximately 185 km northeast of Aberdeen, was discovered in 1985, and first production began in 2008. Brodgar Field currently has two producing wells, the 21/03a-H3Z and 21/03a-H4Z, which tie back to the bridge-linked platform (BLP) connected to the Britannia platform via a pipeline. Brodgar Field produces from a single reservoir, the Britannia Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Brodgar Field is shown in Figure 5.6.8. Cumulative and recent production for Brodgar Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production March 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Britannia 10,451 198,520 196 2,097 40,828 204 Geology Brodgar Field produces from the Cretaceous Britannia Formation in a narrow, elongated northwest-to- southeast-trending structure at approximately 10,900 ft TVDSS. The reservoir has an average porosity of 20 percent and an average Swi of 17 percent. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 5.6.9. A depth structure map on the top of the Britannia Formation is shown in Figure 5.6.10. Methodology The gas rate for the 21/03a-H3Z well was reduced to approximately 20 MMCFD at the end of 2019 to provide processing capacity for the 21/03a-H4 well. The water-gas ratio increased throughout 2020, and the well was shut in during the third quarter of 2020. Work is ongoing to clear a hydrate blockage in the flow line and return the well to production in late 2022. The 21/03a-H4 well came online in the fourth quarter of 2019. The 21/03a-H4 well targets a structural high to the west of the historically developed area, across a saddle. Petrophysical parameters were evaluated from log data, and NRV maps were created for the field. Incremental recovery associated with this location has been estimated by volumetric analysis and analogy to the historical performance of the field. Boundaries on in-field sweep efficiency have been estimated by differentiating current recovery into pressure depletion and water encroachment, or sweep, categories. High- and low-side boundaries of sweep efficiency have been estimated based on varying assumptions of connected volume and degree of water encroachment. The well is expected to produce on plateau until water encroachment impedes production. No study was made to determine whether any undeveloped reserves or contingent resources might be established for Brodgar Field.
Page 25 5.4 CALLANISH FIELD Callanish Field, operated by Harbour, is a saturated oil field with a primary gas cap located in Blocks 15/29b and 21/04a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of 490 ft. The field is located approximately 160 km northeast of Aberdeen and 14 km southwest of Britannia Field. Callanish Field is shown on the location map in Figure 5.6.1. The field was discovered in 1999 and began producing in 2008. As of March 2022, there were four actively producing wells and one shut-in well. The Callanish Field wells tie back to the BLP connected to the Britannia platform via a subsea pipeline. Callanish Field produces from a single reservoir, the Forties Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Callanish Field is shown in Figure 5.6.11. Cumulative and recent production for Callanish Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production March 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Forties 55,738 53,029 82,302 11,351 9,949 15,051 Geology Callanish Field produces from the Upper Paleocene Forties Formation at a depth of approximately 6,500 ft TVDSS and consists of marine turbidites. There are two four-way dip structures separated by a saddle, with a stratigraphic pinch-out defining the southern limit of the accumulation. The reservoir has an average porosity of approximately 21 percent and an Swi of 25 percent. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 5.6.12. A depth structure map on the top of the Forties Formation is shown in Figure 5.6.13. Methodology The producing wells have demonstrated a strong water drive, and reserves estimates are based on DCA of oil cut versus cumulative oil production and oil rate versus time. Because of the flattening in oil cut behavior, oil cut versus cumulative oil is evaluated on both Cartesian and semilogarithmic scales to provide a range of 1P to 3P estimates. No study was made to determine whether any developed non-producing reserves might be established for this field. The 15/29b-F5 well was drilled at the end of 2020 towards the eastern flank, and it is a strong performing well. The well path provides a take point in the original gas cap and has a horizontal section in the eastern flank of the oil rim. We evaluated petrophysics from log data and mapped the field's NRV. Additionally, a 4-D seismic survey was conducted in 2019, and preliminary processed results were made available. These data indicated that sweep is confined to areas with existing wells, with the structural flanks largely undrained. Detailed PVT data were not available, so an unmatched Glaso black oil correlation was used to estimate original in-place volumes. The reserves for this well have been estimated using volumetrics and analogy to similar properties along with the historical performance of the field, informed by the preliminary 4-D seismic data. An additional undeveloped location is included in our contingent resources estimates for Callanish Field. This well targets a portion of the original gas cap in the northwest area of the field and has a horizontal section in the northwestern flank of the oil rim. Similarly to the 15/29b-F5 well, contingent resources for this location have been estimated using volumetrics and analogy to similar properties, along with the historical performance of the field, informed by the preliminary 4-D seismic data.
Page 26 Contingent Resources by Project We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources for Callanish Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) F6 Well 1C 0,384.1 0,333.0 18.5 0,460.0 F6 Well 2C 0,847.7 0,734.9 40.8 1,015.2 F6 Well 3C 1,301.6 1,128.5 62.7 1,558.8 5.5 ENOCHDHU FIELD Enochdhu Field, operated by Harbour, is a satellite oil field to Britannia Field and is located in Block 21/5a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of 460 ft. The field is located 18 km southwest of Britannia Field and approximately 160 km east of Aberdeen. Enochdhu Field is shown on the location map in Figure 5.6.1. The field was discovered in 2005 and began producing in 2015. The field currently has one producing well, the 21/05a-6, which is tied back approximately 8 km to the Callanish subsea manifold. Enochdhu Field produces from a single reservoir, the Forties Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Enochdhu Field is shown in Figure 5.6.14. Cumulative and recent production for Enochdhu Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production March 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Forties 10,306 10,652 5,988 1,140 1,001 3,258 Geology Enochdhu Field produces from the Paleocene Forties Formation at approximately 6,900 ft TVDSS and is saddle-separated from Callanish Field. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 5.6.15. A depth structure map on the top of the Forties Formation is shown in Figure 5.6.13. Methodology Reserves estimates are based on DCA. Similarly to Callanish Field, Enochdhu Field has a strong water drive and has seen a flattening in water cut behavior. Thus, ultimate oil recovery was estimated through Cartesian and semilogarithmic plots of oil cut versus cumulative oil to provide the range of 1P to 3P estimates. Rate-versus-time plots were used to trend historical production and target the expected ultimate recovery. Terminal water cuts greater than 95 percent were chosen for the 1P, 2P, and 3P estimates. With the additional new 15/29b-F5 well in Callanish Field, rates are now constrained in Enochdhu Field. Forecasts are constrained and are designed to increase as Callanish Field production is forecasted to decrease. No study was made to determine whether any developed non-producing reserves, undeveloped reserves, or contingent resources might be established for Enochdhu Field.
5.6 FIGURES
                                                                                                                                    Figure 5.6.1
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN BRITANNIA FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 5.6.2
                                 Figure 5.6.3
             Figure 5.6.4
10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN ALDER FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 5.6.5
                                   Figure 5.6.6
                     Figure 5.6.7
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN BRODGAR FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 5.6.8
                                      Figure 5.6.9
                                                                                                                                                                 Figure 5.6.10
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN CALLANISH FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 5.6.11
                                    Figure 5.6.12
                                                                                                                                                                Figure 5.6.13
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN ENOCHDHU FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 5.6.14
                                  Figure 5.6.15
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 6.0 MONARB AREA
Page 27 6.0 MONARB AREA ______________________________________________________________ The Montrose-Arbroath (MonArb) Area includes the hub fields of Montrose and Arbroath and the satellite fields of Arkwright, Brechin, Cayley, Godwin, Shaw, and Wood. Carnoustie Field, also a satellite field in the MonArb Area, was not included in this evaluation because we estimate it to have negligible volumes of reserves. The MonArb Area is shown on the location map in Figure 6.9.1. The Montrose Alpha platform, commissioned in 1976, is an eight-legged steel jacket structure that has processing, separation, and export facilities for hydrocarbons produced from Montrose, Arbroath, Arkwright, Brechin, Carnoustie, Godwin, and Wood Fields. The Montrose Alpha platform was modified in 1990 to receive liquids from the Arbroath platform, a minimal facilities platform that receives hydrocarbons from Arbroath, Arkwright, Brechin, Carnoustie, and Godwin Fields. Gas and liquids are initially separated at this platform, then exported to the Montrose Alpha platform via a 10-inch liquids pipeline and a 16-inch gas pipeline. Produced liquids from the MonArb Area are exported to the Forties Charlie platform via a 48-km, 14-inch pipeline owned by the MonArb partners. A new platform, the Montrose BLP, was built in 2016 and connected to the Montrose Alpha platform by a 71-m bridge. The Montrose BLP receives hydrocarbons from Cayley and Shaw Fields, which are two subsea developed fields discovered in 2007 and 2009, respectively. Oil is routed over the bridge to the Montrose Alpha platform and gas is exported via a gas riser into a 6-inch export pipeline into the CATS pipeline. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of each of the fields included in the MonArb Area is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Montrose Forties (1) (1) Arbroath Forties (1) (1) Arkwright Forties (1) (1) Brechin Forties (1) (1) Cayley Fulmar 11,600 Faulted Three-way Closure Godwin Fulmar (1) (1) Shaw Fulmar 10,700 Faulted Three-way Closure Wood Fulmar (1) (1) (1) No geologic evaluation was performed. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for each of the fields included in the MonArb Area is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Solution CGR (BBL/MMCF) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Montrose Forties Oil (1) (1) (1) (1) Arbroath Forties Oil (1) (1) (1) (1) Arkwright Forties Oil (1) (1) (1) (1) Brechin Forties Oil (1) (1) (1) (1) Cayley Fulmar Gas - 100 24 12 Godwin Fulmar Oil (1) (1) (1) (1) Shaw Fulmar Oil 900 - 19 25 Wood Fulmar Oil (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) No geologic evaluation was performed.
Page 28 For the MonArb Area, we used DCA, volumetric analysis, and material balance to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines. A summary of the evaluation methods used for each of the fields included in the MonArb Area is shown in the table below. Field Evaluation Methods Montrose DCA Arbroath DCA Arkwright DCA Brechin DCA Cayley DCA, Volumetric Analysis, and Material Balance Godwin DCA Shaw DCA and Volumetric Analysis Wood DCA Development plans for the MonArb Area were provided by Ithaca, and a summary of the development timing for projects in the MonArb Area is shown in the table below. Field Project Timing Class MonArb Area Facilities 2022–2040 Reserves Montrose Phase 1 2022–2025 Reserves Montrose Phase 2 2026–2027 Reserves Arbroath Facilities 2022–2025 Reserves Arbroath Reinstatements 2022–2023 Reserves Shaw Facilities 2022 Reserves Shaw SHC Well 2022–2023 Reserves Wood Facilities 2022–2023 Reserves 6.1 MONTROSE FIELD Montrose Field, operated by Repsol Sinopec Resources UK Limited (Repsol), is an oil field located in Blocks 22/17n and 22/18n in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 289 ft. Montrose Field is shown on the location map in Figure 6.9.1. The field, located approximately 200 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered in 1971 by the drilling of the 22/18-2 well. The field was appraised by the drilling of the 22/17-1 well, and production commenced in June 1976. As of April 2022, 25 production wells and 5 water injection wells have been drilled from the Montrose Alpha platform. Separation, processing, and export of hydrocarbons also occurs on the Montrose Alpha platform. The 22/17-A28Z well is currently the only well online; a number of mechanical failures led to several other wells being prematurely shut in. A proposed infill program is being progressed by the operator, with the FID for Phase 1 expected in 2022. Phase 1 includes the drilling of 4 new subsea wells (the MRC, MRG, MRH, and MRI) and the purchase of associated production equipment. First oil for the Phase 1 wells is expected in 2025. Phase 2 includes the drilling of 2 additional subsea production wells (the MRJ and MRSW), and first oil for the Phase 2 wells is expected in 2027. Montrose Field produces from a single reservoir, the Forties Sandstone. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Montrose Field is shown in Figure 6.9.2. Cumulative and recent production for Montrose Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Forties 91,263 64,265 56,634 429 219 1,549
Page 29 Geology The Paleocene Forties Sandstone is a fine- to coarse-grained sandstone interbedded with silt and mudstone that was deposited as a marine turbidite fan complex. The formation ranges from 300 to 400 ft in thickness, and it has a very high NTG of 70 to 100 percent. The porosity ranges from 21 to 24 percent. The field is located on an unfaulted four-way anticline with very low relief. The structure is very flat with dips of less than 4 degrees. Seismic amplitudes are present within the reservoir and provide insight into reservoir presence, quality, and thickness. Methodology Proved developed producing (PDP) reserves for the 22/17-A28Z well were forecasted by DCA, including a review of WOR and oil production rate versus cumulative oil production. Undeveloped reserves have been estimated by a combination of DCA on shut-in wells located near the proposed infill locations and volumetric analysis. Recovery factors used in volumetric estimates are based on the range of swept zone recovery factors calculated for historical production wells. Reserves by Project We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Montrose Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Phase 1 1P 02,402.2 1,347.2 0.0 02,634.5 Phase 1 2P 06,051.4 3,421.1 0.0 06,641.3 Phase 1 3P 10,438.3 5,859.6 0.0 11,448.5 Phase 2 1P 0,0662.0 0373.3 0.0 00,726.4 Phase 2 2P 01,161.7 0657.4 0.0 01,275.0 Phase 2 3P 01,693.9 0964.4 0.0 01,860.2 6.2 ARBROATH FIELD Arbroath Field, operated by Repsol, is an oil field located in Blocks 22/17n, 22/17s, 22/18a, and 22/22a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 305 ft. Arbroath Field is shown on the location map in Figure 6.9.1. The field, located approximately 8 km south of Montrose Field, was discovered in 1969 by the drilling of the 22/18-1 well. Production commenced in April 1990. As of April 2022, 26 production wells and 9 water injection wells have been drilled from the Arbroath platform. Arbroath is a minimum facilities platform with gas and liquids separation taking place prior to fluids being exported to the Montrose Alpha platform for further processing and export. There are 5 wells currently producing, and most historical producing wells are shut-in because of water production. Water injection ceased in 2004. Three additional reinstatements are planned in the near term for the 22/17-T17, 22/17-T20, and 22/17-T25 wells. Arbroath Field produces from a single reservoir, the Forties Sandstone. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Arbroath Field is shown in Figure 6.9.3. Cumulative and recent production for Arbroath Field are shown in the following table:
Page 30 Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Forties 155,756 84,569 88,253 1,138 405 6,532 Geology Arbroath Field is located adjacent to Montrose Field and is only separated by a minor saddle in the structure. It also produces from the same Forties Sandstone with comparable reservoir characteristics of thickness, NTG, and porosity. The structural setting is very analogous to Montrose Field. Methodology PDP reserves for the producing wells were forecasted by DCA using projections of total liquid rates in combination with projections of WORs. Non-producing reserves for the reinstatement wells have been estimated based on the performance of the recently reinstated 22/17-T19 and 22/17-T21 wells. Reserves by Project We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Arbroath Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Oil Gas NGL Equivalent Project Category (MBBL) (MMCF) (MBBL) (MBOE) Reinstatements 1P 048.4 18.9 0.0 051.6 Reinstatements 2P 073.6 28.7 0.0 078.5 Reinstatements 3P 102.3 39.9 0.0 109.2 6.3 ARKWRIGHT FIELD Arkwright Field, operated by Repsol, is an oil field located in Block 22/23a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 308 ft. Arkwright Field is shown on the location map in Figure 6.9.1. The field, located approximately 217 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered in 1990 by the drilling of the 22/23a-3 well. Production commenced in November 1996 with three production wells. A fourth, horizontal well was drilled and brought online in 2007. The 22/23a-C4 well is the only well currently online. According to Repsol, the 22/23a-C3 well is shut-in pending pipeline ullage and the 22/23a-C2 well is infrequently produced. Arkwright Field produces from a single reservoir, the Forties Sandstone. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Arkwright Field is shown in Figure 6.9.4. Cumulative and recent production for Arkwright Field are shown in the following table:
Page 31 Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Forties 23,068 13,997 6,993 763 380 1,808 Geology Arkwright Field is located adjacent to Arbroath and Montrose Fields. Similarly, this field produces from the Forties Sandstone with very analogous reservoir and structural characteristics to the adjacent fields. Methodology All reserves for Arkwright Field have been estimated by DCA. In addition to the PDP 22/23a-C4 well, probable and possible non-producing reserves were also forecasted for the 22/23a-C2 and 22/23a-C3 wells. These forecasts are based on each well's production history prior to going offline. These two wells are scheduled to produce sequentially after the 22/23a-C4 well depletes, starting with the 22/23a-C3 well. No proved developed non-producing reserves have been estimated for those wells because of the potential for uneconomic low oil production rates upon attempted reactivation. 6.4 BRECHIN FIELD Brechin Field, operated by Repsol, is an oil field located in Block 22/23a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 305 ft. Brechin Field is shown on the location map in Figure 6.9.1. The field, located approximately 221 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered in 2004 by the drilling of the 22/23a-7 well. Production commenced in June 2005 from the 22/23a-7Z well, a horizontal sidetrack on the original discovery well. Brechin Field produces from a single reservoir, the Forties Sandstone. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Brechin Field is shown in Figure 6.9.5. Cumulative and recent production for Brechin Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Forties 5,469 5,919 4,331 948 716 2,156 Geology Brechin Field is located immediately adjacent to Arkwright Field and also produces from the Paleocene Forties Sandstone. The reservoir exhibits similar characteristics as the other fields, but it has slightly less porosity that ranges from 19 to 20 percent. This four-way anticline closure was discovered because of a seismic anomaly. Methodology PDP reserves for Brechin Field were forecasted using DCA. Our study indicates that there are no non- producing or undeveloped reserves for Brechin Field. It is our understanding that there are no future development projects planned for Brechin Field.
Page 32 6.5 CAYLEY FIELD Cayley Field, operated by Repsol, is a gas-condensate field located in Block 22/17s in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 298 ft. Cayley Field is shown on the location map in Figure 6.9.1. The field, located approximately 10 km west of the Montrose Alpha platform, was discovered in 2007 by the drilling of the 22/17-3 exploration well. The field was appraised by the drilling of the 22/17-3Z, 22/17-3Y, and 22/22a-7X wells, and production commenced in June 2017. As of April 2022, a single production well has been drilled as a subsea tieback to the Montrose Alpha platform. Separation, processing, and export of hydrocarbons also occurs on the Montrose Alpha platform. The 22/17-J1 well (also known as the CP01 well) started producing in June 2017 and is still currently producing. Cayley Field produces from the Fulmar Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Cayley Field is shown in Figure 6.9.6. Cumulative and recent production for Cayley Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Fulmar 2,931 58,271 7 850 23,743 0 Geology Cayley Field produces from the Upper Jurassic Fulmar Formation, which consists of shallow marine sandstones. The Fulmar Formation is approximately 200 ft thick with a moderate NTG of approximately 65 percent. The reservoir is of good quality with a porosity averaging approximately 23 percent. The field is a highly faulted structure with faulting occurring in various orientations. Some faults have significant throw that is greater than the thickness of the Fulmar Formation. A type log section illustrating the Fulmar Formation is shown in Figure 6.9.7. A depth structure map on the top of the Fulmar Formation is shown in Figure 6.9.8. Net pay maps were generated for the Upper and Lower Fulmar Formations. Maps were generated based on the lowest known gas depth, a maximum case to a depth of 12,720 ft TVDSS and two intermediate cases. Volumetric analyses were performed based on these maps. Methodology PDP reserves for the producing well were forecasted by DCA and compared against the volumetric analysis for reasonableness of the estimated recovery factors. A material balance analysis was also performed. The material balance analysis did not indicate that the reservoir was behaving in a purely tank-like manner. Rather, there was an early response period during the first 20 billion cubic feet of production, but the subsequent pressure response indicated energy support that was interpreted to be gas feeding in from the adjacent 1B Fault Block. The latter response portion of the material balance analysis indicated a connected volume in reasonable agreement with the lower of the intermediate volumetric cases. 6.6 GODWIN FIELD Godwin Field, operated by Repsol, is an oil field located in Block 22/17s in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 289 ft. Godwin Field is shown on the location map in Figure 6.9.1. The
Page 33 field, located approximately 206 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered in 2009 by the drilling of the 22/17-4 well and appraised by the drilling of an updip sidetrack, the 22/17-4Z well. Production commenced in July 2015 from a single horizontal well, the 22/17-T27, which was drilled as an extended-reach well from the Arbroath platform. Godwin Field produces from a single reservoir, the Fulmar Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Godwin Field is shown in Figure 6.9.9. Cumulative and recent production for Godwin Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Fulmar 4,389 1,944 2,561 590 258 2,366 Geology Godwin Field is located adjacent to Cayley Field and also produces from the Fulmar Formation. The reservoir characteristics are similar to those at Cayley Field. The structure is stratigraphically trapped to the east and south by the Triassic Smith Bank mudstones, dip-closed to the west, and combination fault- and dip-closed to the north. Several north-to-south-trending faults exist in the field. Methodology PDP reserves were forecasted by DCA. Our study indicates that there are no non-producing or undeveloped reserves for Godwin Field. It is our understanding that the operator does not have any future development projects planned for Godwin Field. 6.7 SHAW FIELD Shaw Field, operated by Repsol, is an oil field located in Block 22/22a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 313 ft. Shaw Field is shown on the location map in Figure 6.9.1. The field, located approximately 17 km south of the Montrose Alpha platform, was discovered in 2009 by the drilling of the 22/22a-7 exploration well. The field was appraised by the drilling of the 22/22a-7Z and 22/22a-7Y wells, and production commenced in May 2017. As of April 2022, two production wells and one water injection well have been drilled as subsea tiebacks to the Montrose Alpha platform. Separation, processing, and export of hydrocarbons also occurs on the Montrose Alpha platform. The 22/22a-N2 well (also known as the SHA well) started producing in May 2017 and is still producing. The 22/22a-N3 well (also known as the SHB well) started producing in June 2019 and is still producing. Water injection into the 22/22a-R1 well (also known as the SHD well) started in July 2018. Water injection stopped in May 2020 and recommenced in March 2021. A third production well, the SHC well, is planned to be drilled in 2022 with first production expected in November 2022. Shaw Field produces from a single reservoir, the Fulmar Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Shaw Field is shown in Figure 6.9.10. Cumulative and recent production for Shaw Field are shown in the following table:
Page 34 Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Fulmar 22,678 20,419 1,601 8,660 9,097 3,165 Geology Shaw Field also produces from the Fulmar Formation but the reservoir is much thicker here, over 600 ft thick. The porosity is approximately 19 percent. At Shaw Field, the Fulmar Formation has a highly cemented zone that is a little over 100 ft thick located approximately two-thirds from the top of the reservoir. The structure has north-to-south-trending faults. To the south and west the structure is dip-closed and to the north and east it is stratigraphically sealed against the Smith Bank Formation. A type log section illustrating the Fulmar Formation is shown in Figure 6.9.11. A depth structure map on the base of the Cretaceous Unconformity is shown in Figure 6.9.12. Net pay maps were generated for the Fulmar Formation to the lowest known oil depth (which is the base of the 22/22a-R1 injection well) and to a deeper, high-side possible OWC depth. An attic map to the top of the 22/22a-R1 injection well was also generated. A volumetric analysis was performed based on these maps. Methodology PDP reserves for the producing wells were forecasted by DCA and compared against the volumetric analysis for reasonableness of the estimated recovery factors. Reserves for the undeveloped SHC location are based on the volumetric analysis and analogous performance to the existing production wells adjusted for somewhat reduced field pressure due to lag between injected volumes and produced volumes. Reserves by Project We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Shaw Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) SHC Well 1P 1,333.3 1,126.6 0.0 1,527.5 SHC Well 2P 2,368.7 2,001.5 0.0 2,713.8 SHC Well 3P 4,178.0 3,530.4 0.0 4,786.7 6.8 WOOD FIELD Wood Field, operated by Repsol, is a volatile oil field located in Block 22/18a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 296 ft. Wood Field is shown on the location map in Figure 6.9.1. The field, located approximately 215 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered in 1996 by the drilling of the 22/18-6 well. Production commenced in December 2007 from a single horizontal subsea well, the 22/18-7 (also known as the W01), which is tied back to the Montrose Alpha platform.
Page 35 Wood Field produces from a single reservoir, the Fulmar Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Wood Field is shown in Figure 6.9.13. Cumulative and recent production for Wood Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Fulmar 4,278 9,755 1,010 684 1,626 1,020 Geology Wood Field also produces from the Fulmar Formation. In this field, the interval is approximately 400 ft thick with a high NTG that ranges from 75 to 80 percent. The porosity is approximately 21 percent. The structure is a very highly faulted four-way anticline. These faults have various orientations but most appear to be small-throw faults that do not fully offset the reservoir. Methodology PDP reserves were forecasted based on DCA. Our study indicates that there are no non-producing or undeveloped reserves for Wood Field. It is our understanding that the operator does not have any future development projects planned for Wood Field.
6.9 FIGURES
                                               Figure 6.9.1
10 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN MONTROSE FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 6.9.2 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN ARBROATH FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 6.9.3 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN ARKWRIGHT FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 6.9.4 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN BRECHIN FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 6.9.5 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN CAYLEY FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 6.9.6 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
                              Figure 6.9.7
            Figure 6.9.8
10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN GODWIN FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 6.9.9 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN SHAW FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 6.9.10 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
                                            Figure 6.9.11
            Figure 6.9.12
10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN WOOD FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 6.9.13 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 7.0 MARINER AREA
Page 36 7.0 MARINER AREA ______________________________________________________________ The Mariner Area comprises Mariner, Mariner East, and Cadet Fields. Mariner Field is actively producing, and the volumes for Mariner East and Cadet Fields are classified as contingent resources. The Mariner Area location map is shown in Figure 7.4.1. Mariner and Mariner East Fields target the Maureen Formation and Heimdal Sandstones, and Cadet Field targets the Heimdal Sandstones. Mariner Area development is centered on Mariner A, a steel jacket production, drilling, and living quarters platform. The platform has 60 well slots, of which 50 can be concurrently active. Topsides production capacity is 80,000 BOPD and 290,000 BWPD, with injection capacity of 345,000 BWPD. Oil is exported from Mariner A to Mariner B, a fixed floating storage unit, then to shuttle tankers. Oil production began in 2019, and the Mariner A platform has a 40-year design life. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of the fields included in the Mariner Area is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Mariner Heimdal 3,400 Stratigraphic Pinch-out Mariner Maureen 4,600 Monoclinal Dip with Stratigraphic Pinch-out Mariner East Heimdal 3,900 Stratigraphic Pinch-out Mariner East Maureen 4,900 Monoclinal Dip with Stratigraphic Pinch-out Cadet Heimdal 3,800 Stratigraphic Pinch-out A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for the fields included in the Mariner Area is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Mariner Heimdal Oil 138 34 20 Mariner Maureen Oil 188 30 25 Mariner East Heimdal Oil 138 34 20 Mariner East Maureen Oil 188 30 25 Cadet Heimdal Oil 138 34 20 For the fields included in the Mariner Area, we used DCA, volumetric analysis, and analogy to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines. A summary of the evaluation methods used for each field included in the Mariner Area is shown in the table below. Field Evaluation Methods Mariner DCA, Volumetric Analysis, and Analogy Mariner East Volumetric Analysis and Analogy Cadet Volumetric Analysis and Analogy Development plans for the Mariner Area were provided by Ithaca, and a summary of the development timing for projects in the Mariner Area is shown in the table below.
Page 37 Field Project Timing Class Mariner Heimdal Reserves Wells 2022–2031 Reserves Mariner Maureen First Campaign 2022–2023 Reserves Mariner Maureen Second Campaign 2026–2029 Reserves Mariner Heimdal Contingent Resources Wells 2032–2035 Contingent Resources Mariner Maureen Third Campaign 2030–2032 Contingent Resources Mariner Polymer Injection 2023–2027 Contingent Resources Mariner East Facilities 2023–2030 Contingent Resources Mariner East Wells 2030–2033 Contingent Resources Cadet Facilities 2026–2034 Contingent Resources Cadet Wells 2034–2039 Contingent Resources 7.1 MARINER FIELD Mariner Field, operated by Equinor UK Limited (Equinor), is located in Blocks 9/11a, 9/11b, 9/11c, and 9/11g in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 330 ft. The field, located approximately 150 km east of the Shetland Islands, was discovered by Union Oil Company of California (Unocal) in 1981, with the drilling of the 9/11-1 well. Texaco took ownership of Mariner Field in 1984. Unocal had drilled 4 additional appraisal wells by that time, and Texaco drilled 8 appraisal wells from 1995 to 1997. Equinor assumed operatorship in 2007. To date, there are 22 exploration and appraisal wells and 20 development well penetrations, including sidetracks. First production occurred in August 2019, and the field production rate reached 50,000 BOPD in 2021. The produced oil is heavy, and typical density values are 15 degrees API in the Maureen Formation and 11 degrees API in the Heimdal Sandstones. Production is accomplished with the use of ESPs in every well plus the use of diluent. Diluent was initially used for production from the Maureen Formation, but it is our understanding that this technique has been progressively phased out. It will be used for production of the heavier oil from the Heimdal Sandstone wells. As of the end of February 2022, there were ten wells actively producing from the Maureen Formation and three active water injection wells in the Maureen Formation, one oil well producing from the Heimdal Sandstones with no water injection into the Heimdal Sandstones, and one well returning to production in August 2022 following an ESP replacement. Mariner Field has produced from the Maureen Formation and the Heimdal Sandstones. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Mariner Field is shown in Figure 7.4.2. Cumulative and recent production for Mariner Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production December 2021 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Maureen 21,422 4,483 63,063 19,407 4,280 100,943 Heimdal 00,348 0,055 00,049 02,689 0,425 000,866 Total 21,770 4,539 63,113 22,095 4,705 101,810 Totals may not add because of rounding. Geology Mariner Field is a complex field consisting of two producing formations, the Middle-to-Upper Paleocene Maureen Formation and the Heimdal Sandstones of slightly younger but similar age. The Maureen Formation is present at Mariner and Mariner East Fields and was deposited in a mid-shelf marine
Page 38 environment as a series of sand-rich turbidite sheet lobes. The structure is mostly a monoclonal, east- dipping surface. Slumping is believed to have occurred after deposition of the Maureen Formation, creating intra-formation thrusting and separating the reservoir into various tanks with multiple OWCs throughout the accumulation. The Maureen Formation has very good reservoir characteristics, with 30 percent porosity and an Swi of 25 percent. A type log section illustrating the Maureen Formation for Mariner and Mariner East Fields is shown in Figure 7.4.3, and a depth structure map representing the top of the Maureen Formation is shown in Figure 7.4.4. Following deposition of the Maureen Formation, sea level rose leading to the deposition of hemipelagic mudstones and sandstones. This increase in overburden remobilized sands, most likely from the Maureen Formation, creating injectites that are known as the Heimdal Sandstones. This formation is present in Mariner, Mariner East, and Cadet Fields. The Heimdal Sandstones are vertical dikes and horizontal sills that form a complex system of mostly interconnected sandbodies, which are identified using 3-D seismic data. They stand out as bright amplitudes known as geobodies, indicating the presence of sandbodies and their stratigraphic limits. The Heimdal Sandstones can be in pressure communication but still have unique contacts from one sandbody to another. A schematic illustrating the depositional setting of the injectites is shown in Figure 7.4.5. Injectites generally have excellent reservoir characteristics. The Heimdal Sandstones in the Mariner Area are no exception with 34 percent porosity and an Swi of 20 percent. A type log section illustrating the Heimdal Sandstones for Mariner, Mariner East, and Cadet Fields is shown in Figure 7.4.6, and a depth structure map representing the top of the Heimdal Sandstones is shown in Figure 7.4.7. Methodology Active producing wells are being produced via waterflood drive or experience pressure support from the surrounding aquifer, and most of these wells have sufficient production history to estimate future production through performance-based analysis. DCA was performed by estimating the total liquid production rate and WOR, using different trends for the 1P, 2P, and 3P cases, and then using these values to calculate oil production rates. Terminal water cuts and WORs were determined for the 1P, 2P, and 3P cases from a review of historical terminal rates along with consideration of future operating practices. Future development of the Maureen Formation includes the drilling of four additional production wells and one additional water injection well in 2022 and 2023. In addition, three production wells and one water injection well are further planned from 2026 to 2029. The production wells are a mix of infill locations and step-out locations. Estimated reserves for undeveloped locations in the Maureen Formation are based on adjacent well performance for the infill locations and average region segment performance for the step-out locations. Future development of the Heimdal Sandstones includes the drilling of 36 additional production well locations and 19 injection well locations between 2022 and 2031. It is our understanding that these wells are committed wells per the FDP. Reserves estimates for undeveloped locations in the Heimdal Sandstones are based on volumetric analysis and analogy to the performance of the only current active Heimdal production well, the 9/11a-A24. A net pay map was generated for the aggregate Heimdal sandbodies package. Polygons were drawn around the areas with the thickest aggregate reservoir development based on this map, and estimates for in-place volumes were calculated for these expected development areas. An estimated average recovery factor of 15 percent was calculated based on the EUR for the 9/11a-A24 well and the in-place volume in an estimated production area surrounding the 9/11a-A24 lateral. This recovery factor was applied to the in-place volumes calculated for the expected development areas. The 1P reserves estimates for the Heimdal Sandstones are based on an average recovery factor of 10 percent, and the 3P reserves estimates are based on an average recovery factor of 20 percent.
Page 39 Two projects in Mariner Field are classified as contingent resources. One is a polymer injection project that targets the Heimdal Sandstones and is similar in concept to the operation carried out in Captain Field. Estimates of contingent resources associated with a Heimdal polymer injection project assume successful polymer flood implementation in two of the five Mariner Field areas that have been modeled by the operator: the Central South Lower area and the Central East area. Operator modeling of incremental production resulting from polymer injection was reviewed, and the estimates of increased recovery were checked against in-place volumes and seem reasonable. The increases in estimates are relatively modest compared to the experience at Captain Field, primarily because the oil at Mariner Field is considerably denser. The polymer flood contingent resources are contingent upon the completion of a successful pilot program. The second contingent resources project involves the drilling of additional production and injection locations in the Heimdal Sandstones. These locations would target areas of the reservoir that are less well defined and may be less well developed. These locations are contingent upon the success of the preceding development of the Heimdal Sandstones. Estimates of contingent resources associated with developing areas of the Heimdal Sandstones outside of the expected initial development areas based on our mapping were made using the same methodology that was used for estimating reserves. Reserves and Contingent Resources by Project We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Mariner Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Heimdal Reserves Wells 1P 06,918.6 0.0 0.0 06,918.6 Heimdal Reserves Wells 2P 10,171.9 0.0 0.0 10,171.9 Heimdal Reserves Wells 3P 12,714.6 0.0 0.0 12,714.6 Maureen First Campaign 1P 00,878.1 0.0 0.0 00,878.1 Maureen First Campaign 2P 01,102.4 0.0 0.0 01,102.4 Maureen First Campaign 3P 01,326.9 0.0 0.0 01,326.9 Maureen Second Campaign 1P 00,265.4 0.0 0.0 00,265.4 Maureen Second Campaign 2P 00,442.4 0.0 0.0 00,442.4 Maureen Second Campaign 3P 00,680.9 0.0 0.0 00,680.9 We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Mariner Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Heimdal Contingent Resources Wells 1C 0,559.6 0.0 0.0 0,559.6 Heimdal Contingent Resources Wells 2C 0,959.3 0.0 0.0 0,959.3 Heimdal Contingent Resources Wells 3C 1,258.2 0.0 0.0 1,258.2 Maureen Third Campaign 1C 0,467.7 0.0 0.0 0,467.7 Maureen Third Campaign 2C 0,751.9 0.0 0.0 0,751.9 Maureen Third Campaign 3C 0,982.3 0.0 0.0 0,982.3 Polymer Injection 1C 0,833.0 0.0 0.0 0,833.0 Polymer Injection 2C 1,581.3 0.0 0.0 1,581.3 Polymer Injection 3C 2,330.9 0.0 0.0 2,330.9
Page 40 7.2 MARINER EAST FIELD Mariner East Field is located southeast of Mariner Field in Blocks 9/11a and 9/11b in the UK Sector of the North Sea. Mariner East Field was discovered by the drilling of the 9/11b-11 well, which penetrated the Maureen Formation and Heimdal Sandstone. The development plan assumes a standalone unmanned wellhead platform tied back to the Mariner A platform that would target both the Maureen Formation and Heimdal Sandstone. The Maureen Formation is assumed to be developed with six production wells and two injection wells, and the Heimdal Sandstone is assumed to be developed with three production wells and one injection well. The volumes included in this report for Mariner East Field are classified as contingent resources. Geology The Maureen Formation and Heimdal Sandstones are present at Mariner East Field, and they share the characteristics that are described for Mariner Field in Section 7.1.1. A type log section illustrating the Maureen Formation at Mariner Field is shown in Figure 7.4.3, and this type log is appropriate to describe the formation at Mariner East Field also. The depth structure map on the top of the Maureen Formation includes Mariner East Field and is shown in Figure 7.4.4. A type log section illustrating the Heimdal Sandstones is shown in Figure 7.4.6, and a depth structure map on the top of the Heimdal Sandstones is shown in Figure 7.4.7. Methodology Volumetric analysis and analogy were used to estimate the contingent resources within Mariner East Field. For the Maureen Formation, net pay maps were generated for Mariner Field and Mariner East Field. Estimates of original oil-in-place (OOIP) were calculated for the developed segments of the Maureen Formation of Mariner Field, and ultimate recovery factor estimates were calculated based on the EURs of the wells. Contingent resources estimates were then derived by applying the average Mariner Field recovery factor to oil-in-place estimates calculated for Mariner East Field. Contingent resources for the Heimdal Sandstones within Mariner East Field have been estimated using the same methodology as described for Mariner Field. Volumetric analysis based on a net pay map was combined with the ultimate recovery factor estimated for the producing 9/11a-A24 well. Contingent Resources by Project We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources for Mariner East Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Wells and Facilities (1) 1C (1) 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,000.0 Wells and Facilities (1) 2C (1) 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,000.0 Wells and Facilities 3C 1,730.2 0.0 0.0 1,730.2 (1) There are no low estimate (1C) or best estimate (2C) contingent resources for Mariner East Field at the price and cost parameters used in this report.
Page 41 7.3 CADET FIELD Cadet Field is located west of Mariner Field in Block 8/15a in the UK Sector of the North Sea. Cadet Field was discovered by the drilling of the 8/15-1 well, which penetrated the Heimdal Sandstones. The development plan assumes a standalone unmanned wellhead platform tied back to the Mariner A platform. The Heimdal Sandstones are assumed to be developed with ten production wells and five injection wells. The volumes included in this report for Cadet Field are classified as contingent resources. Geology The Heimdal Sandstones are present at Cadet Field and share the characteristics that are described for Mariner Field in Section 7.1.1. A type log section illustrating the Heimdal Sandstones at Mariner Field is shown in Figure 7.4.6, and this type log is appropriate to describe the formation at Cadet Field also. The depth structure map on the top of the Heimdal Sandstones includes Cadet Field and is shown in Figure 7.4.7. Methodology Contingent resources for the Heimdal Sandstones within Cadet Field have been estimated using the same method as described for Mariner Field. Volumetric analysis based on a net pay map was combined with the ultimate recovery factor estimated for the producing 9/11a-A24 well. Contingent Resources by Project We have evaluated contingent resources for Cadet Field; however, there are no contingent resources at the price and cost parameters used in this report.
7.4 FIGURES
                                           Figure 7.4.1
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2019 2020 2021 | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN MARINER FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 7.4.2
                                    Figure 7.4.3
                                                                          Figure 7.4.4
                      Figure 7.4.5
                                  Figure 7.4.6
                                                                              Figure 7.4.7
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 8.0 JADE AND JADE SOUTH FIELDS
Page 42 8.0 JADE AND JADE SOUTH FIELDS ________________________________________________ Jade and Jade South Fields, operated by Harbour, are high-pressure, high-temperature gas-condensate fields located in Blocks 30/2c and 30/7b in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 260 ft. The fields are shown on the location map in Figure 8.4.1. Jade Field, located approximately 270 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered in 1996 and began producing in 2002 from a normally unattended installation (NUI). There are currently nine wells producing from a fixed wellhead platform, which is tied back to a dedicated separator on the Judy platform. Two of the nine wells produce cyclically. The Judy platform, operated by Harbour, is located approximately 17 km to the southeast and hosts the primary Jade processing facilities. Jade South Field is a southern extension of Jade Field. In the subsurface, it is separated from Jade Field by a structural saddle. Jade South Field produces from a single well, which is drilled from the same platform as the Jade Field wells. Jade Field produces from the Joanne and Judy Sandstones, and Jade South Field produces from the Joanne Sandstone. The single Jade South well came online in January 2022. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Jade and Jade South Fields is shown in Figure 8.4.2. Cumulative and recent production for Jade and Jade South Fields are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production January 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Joanne 35,416 607,308 3,615 5,193 42,175 393 Judy 08,660 056,831 0,378 - - - Joanne/Judy 10,894 135,438 0,752 0,241 04,355 072 Total 54,969 799,577 4,745 5,434 46,530 465 Totals may not add because of rounding. 8.1 GEOLOGY The structure at Jade and Jade South Fields consists of tilted fault blocks. The fields primarily produce from the Triassic Joanne Sandstone, which is a series of stacked fluvial channel sequences, at approximately 15,100 ft TVDSS. The Joanne Sandstone is quite thick and averages approximately 1,000 ft at Jade Field. Reservoir facies range from high permeability channel sands, up to 1 D, to very low permeability siltstones and shales. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 8.4.3. A depth structure map on the top of the Joanne Sandstone is shown in Figure 8.4.4. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of Jade and Jade South Fields is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Jade Judy (1) (1) Jade Joanne 15,100 (1) Jade South Joanne 16,800 Faulted Dip Closure (1) No geologic evaluation was performed. 8.2 METHODOLOGY Reserves estimates for the producing wells are based on DCA, using both rate-versus-time and rate- versus-cumulative gas production methods. A well work program at the end of 2019 provided significant,
Page 43 sustained uplift to the field in 2020. A new well, the 30/02c-JM10, is intended to reestablish and reposition the 30/02c-J10 well and is scheduled to come online in 2022. DCA is also used for this well based on the historical performance of the 30/02c-J10 well, with a slight uplift given in ultimate recovery based on an expected more favorable structural position. The 30/02c-J13 well in Jade South Field was brought online in January 2022 with strong initial rates, comparable to those of early Jade Field wells. Reserves have been estimated using volumetrics and analogy to similar properties, along with the historical performance of Jade Field. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for Jade and Jade South Fields is shown in the table below. Field Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution CGR (BBL/MMCF) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Jade Judy Gas 070 (1) (1) Jade Joanne Gas 350 (1) (1) Jade South Joanne Gas 110 14 25 (1) No geologic evaluation was performed. 8.3 RESERVES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Jade and Jade South Fields, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) JM Well 1P 513.8 2,917.5 088.4 1,105.2 JM Well 2P 653.1 3,708.4 112.4 1,404.8 JM Well 3P 814.6 4,625.4 140.2 1,752.2
8.4 FIGURES
                                                                             Figure 8.4.1
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN JADE AND JADE SOUTH FIELDS UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 8.4.2
                                         Figure 8.4.3
                                                                       Figure 8.4.4
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 9.0 COOK FIELD
Page 44 9.0 COOK FIELD _________________________________________________________________ Cook Field, operated by Ithaca, is an oil field located in Block 21/20a within the Central Graben Area of the UK Continental Shelf in a water depth of approximately 310 ft. Cook Field is shown on the location map in Figure 9.4.1. The field, located 195 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered by the drilling of Amoco's 21/20a-2 well in August 1983 and began commercial production from the 21/20a-P1 well in early 2000. Cook Field was developed under depletion drive by the single producing well until a water injection well, the 21/20a-P2, was drilled in October 2019. The injection well had limited uptime and was repaired in February 2021. Shortly after the February 2021 repair another defect was discovered in the injection system. A repair is planned for late 2022 to bring the well back into service. An additional water injection well, the Cook West well, is planned for 2024. Oil at Cook Field is light and undersaturated with oil gravity of approximately 38 degrees API and an in situ viscosity of approximately 0.3 cP at an average reservoir temperature of 300°F. Fluid expansion and rock compression have been the dominant drive mechanisms as the pressure has depleted nearly 7,000 psi to date. Additionally, there is evidence of aquifer encroachment and pressure support from the formation of a secondary gas cap. The 21/20a-P2 water injection well was drilled to provide additional pressure support and reservoir sweep. The 21/20a-P1 well is a subsea wellhead tied back approximately 12 km to the third- party-operated Anasuria FPSO. The FPSO is shared with additional subsea tiebacks including the Teal, Teal South, and Guillemot A developments. Oil volumes are offloaded via tanker from the Anasuria FPSO to oil markets. Gas volumes are exported via the subsea Shell-Esso Gas and Liquids (SEGAL) pipeline to the Shell Group-operated gas terminal at St. Fergus. Gas-lift infrastructure is in place and operational in the production well. Successful water injection performance has been realized after the recent installation of water injection infrastructure at the 21/20a-P2 well. Cook Field has produced from a single reservoir, the Fulmar Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Cook Field is shown in Figure 9.4.2. Cumulative and recent production for Cook Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Fulmar 53,261 76,479 221 3,502 12,019 - 9.1 GEOLOGY The Cook Field structure consists of two four-way highs that have differing OWCs and that are separated by a normal fault. The productive horizon is the Fulmar Formation. Three fault block areas were mapped and named Main, South, and West Fault Blocks. An OWC was logged in the main block, and a lowest known oil (LKO) deeper than the OWC seen in the main block was logged in the south block. The west block appears connected and contiguous to the main block. The average depth of the structures is approximately 12,000 ft TVDSS. The average porosity is 21 percent, and the average Swi is 10 percent. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 9.4.3. A depth structure map on the top of the Fulmar Formation is shown in Figure 9.4.4. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of Cook Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Fulmar 12,100 Three-way Stratigraphic Trap
Page 45 9.2 METHODOLOGY Because of the field transitioning to waterflood, reserves estimates are based on DCA using liquid rate versus time and WOR versus cumulative oil production to predict oil rate versus time, all guided by history- matched simulation models. In-place volumes were verified through material balance modeling. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for Cook Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Solution CGR (BBL/MMCF) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Fulmar Oil 0,900 - 21 10 The 21/20a-P1 and 21/20a-P2 wells share pressure depletion, but the LKO of the 21/20a-P2 well, at 12,250 ft TVDSS, is deeper than the OWC of the 21/20a-P1 well at 12,090 ft TVDSS. Because of this unexpected discrepancy, additional emphasis was placed on mapped volumes, P/Z estimates, and reservoir simulation. Simulation results were verified using displacement efficiencies and recoveries from the starting point of the waterflood and using available relative permeability lab data and Dykstra Parsons methods for waterflood sweep performance. Nearby analog fields were checked for reasonableness of waterflood recoveries. Differences in 1P, 2P, and 3P estimates were guided by two history-matched simulation models, both representing the difference in OWCs between the main and south fault blocks. One match used a pressure-dependent fault separating the main and south fault blocks. The other relied on a fault sealed down to the LKO found in the 21/20a-P2 well. Aquifer strength, vertical-to-horizontal permeability ratio, the size of the west block OOIP, and voidage played a role in the quality of the history match. Prediction outcomes, especially timing of oil volumes, were further impacted by assumed water injector performance. Liquid rate buildup profiles and water cut breakthrough timing were the key variables differentiating the reserves estimates. Contingent resources associated with the Cook West injection well have been estimated by focusing the analysis on the area between the current production well and injection well to approximate intra-well recovery factors. A similar recovery factor was applied to the intra-well area between the current production well and the planned Cook West injection well, with a discount to sweep efficiency based on geometric differences in the expected flooding pathway. This method was supported by results from Ithaca's reservoir simulation model, which included Cook West injection. Because the two field water injection wells are planned to share a constrained water injection supply pipeline, our predictions assume injection rates will be adjusted to balance injected pore volumes across the two flood regions to optimize waterflood front convergence on the production well. No study was made to determine whether any developed non-producing reserves or undeveloped reserves might be established for Cook Field. 9.3 CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Cook Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be:
Page 46 Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) West Injector (1) 1C (1) 0,000.0 0,000.0 0.0 0,000.0 West Injector 2C 3,919.4 1,151.5 0.0 4,118.0 West Injector 3C 6,160.9 2,062.7 0.0 6,516.5 (1) There are no low estimate (1C) contingent resources for Cook Field at the price and cost parameters used in this report.
9.4 FIGURES
                                      Figure 9.4.1
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN COOK FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 9.4.2 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
                                 Figure 9.4.3
                   Figure 9.4.4
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 10.0 ERSKINE FIELD
Page 47 10.0 ERSKINE FIELD ______________________________________________________________ Erskine Field, operated by Ithaca, is a gas-condensate field located in Blocks 23/26a and 23/26b in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 300 ft. Erskine Field is shown on the location map in Figure 8.4.1. The field, located approximately 241 km east of Aberdeen, was discovered in 1985 and began producing in 1997 from a NUI operated remotely from the Lomond platform. In January 2018, the field was shut in because of a blockage of the condensate export line from the Lomond platform. Installation of a new line to bypass the blocked segment was completed and production was restarted in October 2018. From the Lomond platform, gas and condensate are exported separately to the North Everest platform, operated by Harbour, before gas is exported via the CATS. Condensate is exported through the FPS. There are currently four active wells. The W1 well is currently offline because of an issue with scale in the tubing. A remedial workover is planned in 2022. Erskine Field has produced from three reservoirs: the Erskine, Kimmeridge, and Pentland Sandstones. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Erskine Field is shown in Figure 10.4.1. Cumulative and recent production for Erskine Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Erskine 41,482 228,135 01,250 4,141 35,734 333 Kimmeridge 09,142 059,239 00,330 - - - Pentland 19,862 100,710 10,933 0,017 00,116 012 Total 70,486 388,085 12,513 4,158 36,222 345 Totals may not add because of rounding. 10.1 GEOLOGY Hydrocarbons at Erskine Field have been produced from three Jurassic reservoirs: the Erskine, Kimmeridge, and Pentland Sandstones. The Erskine Sandstone is a fine-grained, bioturbated, shaley sandstone deposited in a shallow marine environment and is the main reservoir for the field. It is produced from approximately 15,100 ft TVDSS and has an average porosity of 22 percent and an Swi of 24 percent. The Kimmeridge Sandstone is an amalgamation of marine turbidites. The Pentland Sandstone is a mix of sandstone, shales, coals, and siltstones deposited in a fluvial-lacustrine environment. A type log section illustrating the Erskine and Pentland Sandstones is shown in Figure 10.4.2. A depth structure map on the top of the Erskine Sandstone is shown in Figure 10.4.3. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of Erskine Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Kimmeridge 14,800 Stratigraphic Trap Erskine 15,300 Faulted Dip Closure Pentland 15,600 Faulted Dip Closure 10.2 METHODOLOGY Reserves estimates for the producing wells are based on DCA and volumetric analysis. Erskine Field produces through the Lomond platform, which has historically experienced high downtime rates. Average
Page 48 forecast rates are based on recent daily rates and assumed average uptime rates taken from an analysis of historic downtime. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for Erskine Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution CGR (BBL/MMCF) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Kimmeridge Gas 190 20 07 Erskine Gas 120 22 24 Pentland Gas 210 16 22 One undeveloped location was included in the contingent resources category. The Location F well is an infill opportunity in the main fault block, roughly on-strike with the currently producing 23/26b-W5 well but with good separation from other producing wells. A future compressor rewheel project has also been included to drop the flowing tubing pressure of the producing wells and recover additional resources. The contingent resources have been estimated using volumetric analysis and analogy to similar properties. Development plans for Erskine Field were provided by Ithaca, and a summary of the development timing for projects in Erskine Field is shown in the table below. Project Timing Class Compressor Rewheel 2024 Contingent Resources Location F 2025 Contingent Resources 10.3 CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Erskine Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Compressor Rewheel 1C 0,758.1 06,115.3 000.0 1,812.4 Compressor Rewheel 2C 1,358.3 10,956.8 000.0 3,247.4 Compressor Rewheel 3C 2,179.2 17,578.5 000.0 5,209.9 Location F 1C 0,609.7 05,901.7 085.4 1,712.7 Location F 2C 1,375.9 11,098.8 160.7 3,450.2 Location F 3C 2,232.3 15,434.8 223.5 5,117.0
10.4 FIGURES
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN ERSKINE FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 10.4.1 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
                                       Figure 10.4.2
                    Figure 10.4.3
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 11.0 ELGIN-FRANKLIN FIELD
Page 49 11.0 ELGIN-FRANKLIN FIELD _______________________________________________________ Elgin-Franklin Field is composed of two gas-condensate fields, Elgin and Franklin Fields, located in Blocks 22/30b, 22/30c, 29/4d, 29/5b, and 29/5c in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 330 ft. The fields, operated by TotalEnergies E&P U.K. Limited (Total), are located approximately 240 km east of Aberdeen and are produced from a total of four wellhead platforms back to one central processing unit. Gas is exported via the Shearwater Elgin Area Line, and condensate is exported through the FPS. For the purposes of this report, these two fields are combined into Elgin-Franklin Field to facilitate the handling of projects impacting the shared infrastructure. Elgin-Franklin Field is shown on the location map in Figure 8.4.1. For the purposes of our technical analysis, Elgin-Franklin Field was split into three separate areas: Elgin, Franklin, and West Franklin. Each area has its own distinct structure and trap. The Elgin, Franklin, and West Franklin Areas were discovered in 1991, 1985, and 2003, respectively. All three areas have high- pressure, high-temperature fluids with initial pressures over 15,500 psia and temperatures over 370°F. There are currently seven active production wells in the Elgin Area, five in the Franklin Area, and four in the West Franklin Area. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Elgin-Franklin Field is shown in Figure 11.6.1. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of each area is shown in the table below. Area Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Elgin Fulmar 17,500 Faulted Anticline Franklin Fulmar 17,600 Faulted Dip Closure Franklin Pentland 18,200 Faulted Dip Closure Franklin Skagerrak 18,700 Faulted Dip Closure West Franklin Fulmar 18,600 Faulted Anticline A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for the Elgin, Franklin, and West Franklin Areas is shown in the table below. Area Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution CGR (BBL/MMCF) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Elgin Fulmar Gas 310 15 40 Franklin Fulmar Gas 160 13 43 Franklin Pentland Gas 160 10 60 Franklin Skagerrak Gas 160 10 - West Franklin Fulmar Gas 160 11 - For Elgin-Franklin Field, we used DCA, performance analysis, volumetric analysis, and analogy to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines. A summary of the evaluation methods used for Elgin-Franklin Field is shown in the table below. Category Evaluation Methods Producing Wells DCA Non-Producing Wells P/Z Analysis and Analogy Undeveloped Locations Analogy Development plans for Elgin-Franklin Field were provided by Ithaca, and development timing for projects in Elgin-Franklin Field is shown in the table below.
Page 50 Field/Area Project Timing Class Elgin-Franklin LP Compression 2024–2025 Reserves Elgin-Franklin LLP Compression 2027 Reserves Elgin Location EIH 2022–2023 Contingent Resources Elgin G6Z Well 2025 Contingent Resources 11.1 ELGIN AREA Wells in the Elgin Area encountered a complex faulted anticline broken into various fault blocks with unique water contacts. This field produces from the Upper Jurassic Fulmar Formation at approximately 17,500 ft TVDSS; this formation is a shallow marine, bioturbated sandstone. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 11.6.2. A depth structure map on the top of the Fulmar Formation is shown in Figure 11.6.3. Cumulative and recent production for the Elgin Area are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Fulmar 67,429 384,287 3,173 26,383 180,117 1,768 The reserves estimates associated with the producing wells in the Elgin Area are based on DCA and do not include the benefits of future planned compression projects. The only developed non-producing reserves estimated for the Elgin Area are included within the compression projects discussed in Section 11.4. Two additional undeveloped locations are also included in the contingent resources category. The 22/30c-G6Z well is a sidetrack of the shut-in 22/30c-G6 well, which went offline because of scaling issues. The contingent resources estimates are based on DCA of the original 22/30c-G6 well. A feasible scaling inhibition treatment needs to be found and demonstrated in the 22/30c-G10 well (which is affected by similar scaling issues) to finalize the development plan for this sidetrack. The EIH well is a proposed location in the central fault block located to the west of the 22/30c-B5 well. The results of the proposed EIH well will depend on the uncertain petrophysical properties and the degree to which that area is already being drained by production wells. Analogy to other projects was used to estimate contingent resources for the EIH well, with recovery similar to the 22/30c-G6Z well in the 1C estimates and recovery similar to the 22/30c-B5 well in the 2C and 3C estimates. 11.2 FRANKLIN AREA The Franklin Area is a tilted fault block approximately 5 km south of the Elgin Area. Three reservoirs have produced here: the Fulmar Formation at approximately 17,600 ft TVDSS, the Middle Jurassic Pentland Formation at approximately 18,050 ft TVDSS, and the Triassic Skagerrak Formation at approximately 18,700 ft TVDSS. Cumulative and recent production for the Franklin Area are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Fulmar/Pentland/ Skagerrak 152,212 993,143 7,981 12,795 119,510 1,715 The reserves estimates associated with the producing wells in the Franklin Area are based on DCA and do not include the benefits of the future planned compression projects. There are also developed non- producing reserves estimated for the Franklin Area included in the compression projects discussed in Section 11.4.
Page 51 11.3 WEST FRANKLIN AREA Like the Franklin Area, the West Franklin Area produces from the Fulmar Formation, but at a deeper depth of approximately 18,600 ft TVDSS. Cumulative and recent production for the West Franklin Area are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Fulmar 77,195 528,697 5,114 15,391 119,519 1,536 The reserves estimates associated with the producing wells in the West Franklin Area are based on DCA and do not include the benefits of future planned compression projects. There are also developed non- producing reserves estimated for the West Franklin Area included in the compression projects discussed in Section 11.4. 11.4 COMPRESSION PROJECTS Developed non-producing reserves for Elgin-Franklin Field have been estimated for two compression projects planned for the entire field. The Low Pressure (LP) and Low Low Pressure (LLP) compression projects will drop the platform inlet pressures to approximately 435 and 233 psia, respectively. Reserves for these projects have been estimated for each area using material balance analysis and analogy. These reserves were then combined, along with the project capital costs, into one line item per project. 11.5 RESERVES AND CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Elgin-Franklin Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) LP Compression 1P 486.2 6,717.4 228.6 1,873.0 LP Compression 2P 486.2 6,717.4 228.6 1,873.0 LP Compression 3P 486.2 6,717.4 228.6 1,873.0 LLP Compression 1P 084.8 1,172.0 039.9 0,326.8 LLP Compression 2P 084.8 1,172.0 039.9 0,326.8 LLP Compression 3P 084.8 1,172.0 039.9 0,326.8 We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Elgin-Franklin Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Location EIH 1C 047.7 0,505.3 17.2 152.0 Location EIH 2C 129.9 1,375.6 46.8 413.9 Location EIH 3C 159.8 1,692.9 57.6 509.3
Page 52 Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) G6Z Well 1C 047.7 0,505.3 17.2 152.0 G6Z Well 2C 087.6 0,927.3 31.6 279.0 G6Z Well 3C 113.2 1,199.4 40.8 360.8
11.6 FIGURES
10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 7 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN ELGIN-FRANKLIN FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 11.6.1 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
                                           Figure 11.6.2
                  Figure 11.6.3
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 12.0 ALBA FIELD
Page 53 12.0 ALBA FIELD _________________________________________________________________ Alba Field, operated by Ithaca, is an oil field located in Block 16/26a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of 440 ft. Alba Field is shown on the location map in Figure 5.6.1. The field, located approximately 225 km northeast of Aberdeen, was discovered in 1984 with the drilling of the 16/26-5 well, and 16 additional appraisal wells have been drilled. Annex B approval to develop the field was granted in 1991, and production began in 1994. There are 23 active production wells. Oil at Alba Field has high density, a low GOR, and high in situ viscosity. Production is possible because of high reservoir permeability, horizontal production wells that are typically 400 to 2,000 ft in lateral length, and bottom-drive water injection to supplement the limited natural aquifer support. The field is developed with long-reach wells from the Alba North Platform (ANP) and two subsea manifolds: the Alba Extreme South (AXS) for production wells and the Southern Area Development Injection Equipment (SADIE) for injection wells. Oil is transported by tanker ship from a floating storage unit. Of the 23 active production wells, 17 are platform wells drilled from the ANP and 6 are subsea wells drilled from the AXS. Alba Field has produced from a single reservoir, the Alba Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Alba Field is shown in Figure 12.4.1. Cumulative and recent production for Alba Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production April 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Alba 210,448 64,168 1,242,736 6,806 2,871 155,412 12.1 GEOLOGY Alba Field is an elongated northwest-to-southeast-trending structure that is approximately 9 km in length. The Alba Formation lies at approximately 6,200 ft TVDSS and is composed of Middle Eocene turbidite sands with high NTG, high porosity, and remarkable petrographic uniformity. This reservoir was deposited in a pre-existing scour and is in excess of 200 ft thick. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 12.4.2. A depth structure map on the top of the Alba Formation is shown in Figure 12.4.3. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of Alba Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Alba 06,200 Stratigraphic Trap 12.2 METHODOLOGY For Alba Field, we used DCA and performance analysis to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines. A summary of the evaluation methods used for Alba Field is shown in the table below. Category Evaluation Methods Existing Wells DCA Infill Wells Type Curve Analysis
Page 54 DCA was used to predict the future performance of the 23 currently active wells in the field. DCA projections were made of oil rate and total liquids rate. Adjustments were made to ensure that the resulting water cut and WOR trends were consistent with historical performance when plotted versus time and cumulative oil production. A maximum terminal water cut of 99 percent was used based on a review of active and shut- in well historical water cut values. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for Alba Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Alba Oil 0,250 35 07 Nine new infill platform well locations were evaluated for reserves. It is our understanding that these nine wells are in Ithaca's current business plan and are scheduled to occur within the next five years, qualifying them for inclusion in the proved category. The EUR for new infill drillwells generally decreases over time. A statistical and type curve analysis was performed for a subgroup of relatively recent wells, namely all production wells drilled after January 2010. New 1P, 2P, and 3P infill well production profiles were developed from this review and used for the future undeveloped locations. Ithaca's infill target portfolio includes additional target locations beyond those scheduled to occur over the next five years. Contingent resources have been estimated for seven additional platform well infill locations. Volumes for these locations are also based on the performance of the 2010-and-later well group, with adjustments for decreasing rates and EURs versus time. These contingent resources locations are scheduled to be drilled between the beginning of 2028 and the end of 2031. Development plans for Alba Field were provided by Ithaca, and a summary of the development timing for projects in Alba Field is shown in the table below. Project Timing Class Infill Campaigns 2022–2026 Reserves Recompletions 2022–2024 Reserves Contingent Resources Wells 2028–2031 Contingent Resources 12.3 RESERVES AND CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest reserves by development project for Alba Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Reserves Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Infill Campaigns 1P 1,713.8 0.0 0.0 1,713.8 Infill Campaigns 2P 3,046.3 0.0 0.0 3,046.3 Infill Campaigns 3P 4,398.3 0.0 0.0 4,398.3 Recompletions 1P 0,039.6 0.0 0.0 0,039.6 Recompletions 2P 0,093.8 0.0 0.0 0,093.8 Recompletions 3P 0,149.8 0.0 0.0 0,149.8
Page 55 We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Alba Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Contingent Resources Wells (1) 1C (1) 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,000.0 Contingent Resources Wells (1) 2C (1) 0,000.0 0.0 0.0 0,000.0 Contingent Resources Wells 3C 1,623.4 0.0 0.0 1,623.4 (1) There are no low estimate (1C) or best estimate (2C) contingent resources for Alba Field at the price and cost parameters used in this report.
12.4 FIGURES
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN ALBA FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 12.4.1
                                   Figure 12.4.2
             Figure 12.4.3
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 13.0 PIERCE FIELD
Page 56 13.0 PIERCE FIELD _______________________________________________________________ Pierce Field, operated by Shell, is located within Blocks 23/22a and 23/27a in the UK Sector of the North Sea approximately 240 km due east of Aberdeen in 280 ft of water. Pierce Field is shown on the location map in Figure 13.4.1. The field is centered around two salt diapirs, both with oil legs containing black oil and respective gas caps. The two parts of the field are referred to as North Pierce and South Pierce. Solution gas drive is the primary drive mechanism. Development wells have been drilled from three subsea wellhead sites: the main drill site centrally located between North and South Pierce, the satellite drill site located on the southwest side of South Pierce, and the C1z wellhead on the north side of North Pierce. Eight production wells and three gas injection wells are currently active. Long horizontal production wells currently target the oil rim. Gas has been injected across both diapirs, while water injection has been focused on the southern area where a weaker aquifer is apparent. All wells are connected through subsea manifolds to the Haewene Brim FPSO, which is operated by Bluewater Energy Services BV. Oil is exported to market via shuttle tankers from the Haewene Brim FPSO. All produced gas, after volumes are consumed in field operations, is injected back into the field. A depressurization project allowing the export and sale of gas through a subsea tie-in to the Shell-operated SEGAL subsea pipeline is sanctioned, with planned startup in September 2022. The field was temporarily shut in starting in October 2021 to allow this work to be completed. Pierce Field produces from a single reservoir, the Forties Formation. A summary graph of the gross historical production for Pierce Field is shown in Figure 13.4.2. Cumulative and recent production for Pierce Field are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production October 2021 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Forties 81,117 402,604 5,532 7,349 70,039 191 13.1 GEOLOGY Pierce Field is positioned around twin salt diapir structures, and the primary producing reservoir is the Paleocene Forties Formation. The Paleocene formations at Pierce Field include the Forties, Lista, and Maureen Formations. Both diapir structures are extensively radially faulted, and OWCs and GOCs vary across the field. The OWCs range from as deep as 10,170 ft TVDSS in the northwest to as shallow as 8,610 ft TVDSS in the southeast, presumed to be the result of a hydrodynamic aquifer. The GOCs vary from as shallow as 7,360 ft TVDSS in the south diapir to as deep as 8,820 ft TVDSS in the north diapir. The oil leg shares a common initial pressure across both structures and communicates across the saddle area. Fault blocks tend to show varying degrees of isolation during production. Fault throws are generally on the order of 110 ft without complete offset of the reservoir. Average porosities are in excess of 18 percent with average Swi of approximately 50 percent. Gross reservoir thickness also varies from as thick as 590 ft in the saddle area to as thin as 50 ft along the flanks of the diapirs. A type log section illustrating the Paleocene formations is shown in Figure 13.4.3. A depth structure map on the top of the Forties Formation is shown in Figure 13.4.4. A summary of certain geologic characteristics for Pierce Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Forties 09,000 Salt Dome Dip Closure
Page 57 13.2 METHODOLOGY For Pierce Field, we used DCA, performance analysis, volumetric analysis, analogy, and material balance to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines. A summary of the evaluation methods used for Pierce Field is shown in the table below. Category Evaluation Methods Developed Wells DCA Undeveloped Locations Volumetric Analysis, Analogy, and Material Balance For the producing wells, oil rate-versus-time forecasts were created for the range of expected outcomes along with varying stabilized GORs. Original in-place volumes for Pierce Field were difficult to map, with initial estimates already outpaced by cumulative production. The primary source of difficulty was assessing NRV in proximity to the salt diapirs. Thus, NRV multipliers were determined for the oil leg and gas cap based on P/Z analysis of key early field life events, namely the extended production and shutting-in of the 23/22a-A3X development well. NRV multipliers were applied to mapped in-place estimates to assess the original resources in-place. To check the reasonableness of these estimates, recovery factors by fault block were estimated through a production and injection well-level allocation process. While not unique, this method did inherently have limited degrees of freedom due to repeated overlaps in fault block drainage from the development wells. Recovery factors for fault blocks with recently developed and future developed well locations were determined through analogy and historical field performance in other areas. The 23/22a-A14 well was drilled and brought online in the fourth quarter of 2020. The D3 well location is carried as contingent resources and is expected to come online in 2024. The future location is given the balance of production that the currently producing wells are not expected to recover, up to the estimated recovery factor. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for Pierce Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Solution CGR (BBL/MMCF) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Forties Oil/Gas 0,975 065 18 50 While it is unclear whether every fault block is fully isolated in the hydrocarbon column, early production and RFT data indicate a degree of compartmentalization supporting the conservative assumption of isolated fault blocks. Additionally, energy from the shared aquifer is considered relatively minor when compared to hydrocarbon and rock compressibility. 13.3 CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources for Pierce Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) D3 Well 1C 175.1 1,133.9 134.3 504.8 D3 Well 2C 259.7 0,716.2 084.8 468.0 D3 Well 3C 516.2 0,643.5 076.2 703.3
13.4 FIGURES
                                      Figure 13.4.1
10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 6 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 GAS (MCF / MO) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN PIERCE FIELD UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 Figure 13.4.2 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions.
                                        Figure 13.4.3
               Figure 13.4.4
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 14.0 COLUMBA TERRACES AREA
Page 58 14.0 COLUMBA TERRACES AREA ___________________________________________________ The Columba Terraces Area, located to the west and southwest of the giant Ninian Field, is a complex of three downthrown fault blocks known as the B, D, and E Terraces. Both Ninian Field and the Columba Terraces Area are operated by Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL). No geologic evaluation was performed for the Columba Terraces Area. For the Columba Terraces Area, we used DCA to classify, categorize, and estimate volumes in accordance with the 2018 PRMS definitions and guidelines. The Columba Terraces Area is a complex of oil fields located in Blocks 3/7a and 3/8a in the UK Sector of the North Sea in a water depth of approximately 476 ft. The Columba Terraces Area is shown on the location map in Figure 1.1.2. The complex is located approximately 386 km northeast of Aberdeen. The B, D, and E Terraces were discovered in 1976, 1980, and 1975, respectively. Production commenced in 1996 for the B Terrace, 1994 for the D Terrace, and 1998 for the E Terrace. Production has been via long-reach wells drilled from the Ninian South platform. One injection well has been drilled from the Ninian Central platform. Currently there are seven producing wells, of which one is a continuous production well, two are cyclic production wells, and four are water injection wells. The Columba Terraces Area produces from the sandstones of the Middle Jurassic Brent Group. A summary graph of the gross historical production for the Columba Terraces Area is shown in Figure 14.3.1. Cumulative and recent production for the Columba Terraces Area are shown in the following table: Cumulative Production May 2022 Average Daily Rate Reservoir Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) Water (MBBL) Oil (BOPD) Gas (MCFD) Water (BWPD) Brent Group 66,454 0.0 0.0 798 0.0 0.0 14.1 GEOLOGY The Columba Terraces Area is a westward-dipping terrace within the Viking Graben of the northern North Sea. The Viking Graben is a north-northeastern-trending graben structure that was formed during a Jurassic rifting event. 14.2 METHODOLOGY PDP reserves were forecasted based on DCA at the rolled-up terrace level. It is our understanding that the operator does not have any future development projects planned for the Columba Terraces Area.
14.3 FIGURES
10 3 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 | OIL (BBL / MO) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROSS HISTORICAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROPERTIES LOCATED IN THE COLUMBA TERRACES AREA UNITED KINGDOM SECTOR OF THE NORTH SEA ITHACA ENERGY (UK) LIMITED AS OF JUNE 30, 2022 All estimates and exhibits herein are part of this NSAI report and are subject to its parameters and conditions. Figure 14.3.1
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 15.0 CAMBO FIELD
Page 59 15.0 CAMBO FIELD _______________________________________________________________ Cambo Field, operated by Siccar Point Energy Limited (Siccar Point), is an undeveloped oil field located in Blocks 204/9a and 204/10a and Blocks 204/4a and 204/5a in the North Atlantic Ocean in a water depth of 3,600 ft. Cambo Field is shown on the location map in Figure 4.4.1. The field, located approximately 125 km northwest of the Shetland Islands, was discovered in 2002 with the drilling of the 204/10-1 well. Between 2002 and 2018, Cambo Field has been appraised with a total of six wells and three sidetracks. The field is also covered by high-resolution dual-azimuth 3-D seismic data. In 2018, an extended well test was carried out on the most recent 204/10a-5Y well. The proposed field development will be from two production subsea drill center manifolds with six slots each and two injection subsea drill center manifolds to accommodate four planned injection wells, all tied back to an FPSO. Initial field development is proposed to be carried out in two drilling campaigns. The first campaign is planned to run from 2024 to 2026. This campaign consists of five production wells and two injection wells, with first oil expected in 2028. After first oil, an additional four production wells and two injection wells will be added. A subsequent field development phase is also being considered to exploit secondary field reservoir targets. It is our understanding that the formal FDP for Cambo Field has been agreed to in principle with the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA). The accompanying environmental statement has been through the statutory public consultation. Final approval of these documents require all joint venture partners to confirm their intentions and apply for formal consent to the UK regulators. The license milestone to finalize applications and gain final approval has been extended until March 31, 2024. 15.1 GEOLOGY The structure at Cambo Field consists of a number of stacked members of the Paleocene Hildasay Sandstones, with shale and coals separating the individual members. From shallowest to deepest (youngest to oldest) the members are the H70, H50, H40, H30, and H10/H20 Sandstones. For the purposes of this report, we combined the H50, H40, and H30 Sandstone members because there is very little to no separation between these members in some of the wells. On average, the reservoirs are thicker and of better quality on the northern side of the structure. The reservoirs thin and degrade toward the southern extent of the structure. The Hildasay Sandstones were deposited in a series of floodplain, lagoonal-to- swampy, and fluvial channel environments with some shallow marine environment contribution as well. The most significant members of the field (the H50, H40, and H30 Sandstones) have very good reservoir characteristics with 28 percent porosity and 20 percent Swi. A type log section illustrating these sandstone members is shown in Figure 15.4.1. A depth structure map on the top of the H30 Sandstone is shown in Figure 15.4.2. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of Cambo Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Hildasay 7,550 Four-way Anticline 15.2 METHODOLOGY A combination of volumetric analysis, reservoir simulation, and analogy was used to estimate the contingent resources for Cambo Field. Our initial in-place estimates are based on a net pay mapping down to the logged OWC. Low, mid, and high cases were generated based on uncertainties regarding development away from well control, particularly reservoir quality in the southern portion of the field, which contains only one appraisal well. A good amount of log data exist from which to make reasonable estimates of porosity and water saturation, plus significant production to surface from the extended well test for fluid properties. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for Cambo Field is shown in the table below.
Page 60 Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Hildasay Oil 0,300 28 20 Reference case, P10, and P90 reservoir simulation models developed by the operator were provided. The models were reviewed by NSAI and deemed to be a reasonable interpretation based on the acquired data. The biggest discrepancy between the reference case model and NSAI's central case assumptions was the degree of reservoir development in the southern portion of the field. The simulation model was modified by adjusting the in-place volume in the model to match our mapping. This volumetric adjustment was relatively minor in the northern portion of the field where the majority of the appraisal wells are; however, it was significant (over 50 percent reduction) in the southern portion of the field. The revised model was examined to ensure that the history match to the extended well test remained good. The resulting model flow streams were then used as a guide for the development well projections. Volumetric analysis and analogy have been used to estimate the contingent resources for subsequent field development to exploit the secondary reservoir targets, the H70 and H10/20 Sandstones. The H70 Sandstone would be an oil development. Low and high case net pay maps were generated for the H70 Sandstone member and a single well development was assumed. The H10/20 Sandstone would be a gas development. Since there is a lack of wellbore penetrations for the H10/20 Sandstone member, a polygon was constructed to limit the developed area to a region proximal to the well control and within good amplitude response. Low and high cases were based on a variation of average net pay within the developed area polygon. A single well development was assumed. Development plans for Cambo Field were provided by Ithaca, and a summary of the development timing for projects in Cambo Field is shown in the table below. Project Timing Class First Campaign 2024–2026 Contingent Resources Second Campaign 2028–2031 Contingent Resources H70 Well 2034–2036 Contingent Resources H10/20 Well 2035–2036 Contingent Resources 15.3 CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Cambo Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) First Campaign 1C 46,042.6 16,114.9 0.0 048,821.0 First Campaign 2C 70,832.4 24,791.3 0.0 075,106.8 First Campaign 3C 97,276.3 34,046.7 0.0 103,146.4 Second Campaign 1C 14,896.7 05,213.8 0.0 015,795.7 Second Campaign 2C 23,154.9 08,104.2 0.0 024,552.2 Second Campaign 3C 34,631.3 12,121.0 0.0 036,721.1
Page 61 Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) H70 Well 1C 01,485.2 00,519.8 0.0 001,574.8 H70 Well 2C 02,566.4 00,898.2 0.0 002,721.2 H70 Well 3C 03,303.7 01,156.3 0.0 003,503.0 H10/20 Well 1C 00,000.0 01,789.4 0.0 000,308.5 H10/20 Well 2C 00,000.0 05,083.9 0.0 000,876.5 H10/20 Well 3C 00,000.0 09,363.9 0.0 001,614.5
15.4 FIGURES
                                           Figure 15.4.1
                                                       Figure 15.4.2
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 16.0 ROSEBANK FIELD
Page 62 16.0 ROSEBANK FIELD ____________________________________________________________ Rosebank Field, operated by Equinor, is located in Blocks 205/1a, 205/2a, 213/26b, and 213/27a in the North Atlantic Ocean in a water depth of approximately 3,600 ft. The field, located approximately 130 km northwest of the Shetland Islands, was discovered by Chevron in 2004 with the drilling of the 213/27-1Z well. Chevron drilled an additional five appraisal wells with additional sidetracks, totaling approximately ten well penetrations from 2006 to 2009. Equinor assumed operatorship in 2018 upon purchase of Chevron's interest. Suncor Energy Inc. is the other field partner. First production is planned for 2026, with FID anticipated in 2023. The development concept consists of 17 subsea wells (12 production and 5 water injection wells) tied back to the Knarr FPSO. The planned development wells target the Colsay-1, Colsay-3, and Colsay-4 Sands, and these development wells consist of both horizontal wells dedicated to a single sand and nearly vertical wells designed to produce multiple sands simultaneously. Data collected from the field indicate a nearly saturated light oil of approximately 34 degrees API, GOR of approximately 700 SCF/STB, and oil viscosity of 0.78 cP. The Knarr FPSO is to be repurposed and relocated upon cessation of production from Knarr Field, expected in the third quarter of 2022. The design capacity is approximately 63,000 BOPD. Oil will be exported via shuttle tanker and gas will be exported via pipeline. The volumes estimated in this report for Rosebank Field are classified as contingent resources; these resources are contingent upon FID and regulatory approvals. It is our understanding that the Rosebank project has passed the stage where the development concept has been decided and is now in front end engineering and design. Regulatory and joint venture approval documents are now being prepared so all joint venture partners can confirm their intentions in writing and submit applications to the UK regulators. The license milestone to finalize applications and gain formal approval has been extended until August 30, 2023. 16.1 GEOLOGY The structure at Rosebank Field is a northeast-to-southwest-trending anticline that is approximately 18 km long and 4 km wide, with the top depth at approximately 9,000 ft TVDSS. The target reservoirs in the field are part of the Colsay Member of the Flett Formation. The reservoirs within the Colsay Member range in age from late Paleocene to early Eocene and consist of a series of siliclastic deposits that are interbedded with volcanic and volcaniclastic sequences. Within Rosebank Field, hydrocarbons have been discovered in the Colsay-1, Colsay-2, Colsay-3, and Colsay-4 Sandstones, in order from shallowest to deepest. The Colsay-1 Reservoir is well developed in the southern portion of the field and the Colsay-4 Reservoir serves as a secondary target. The Colsay-3 Reservoir is better developed to the north. The Colsay-2 Reservoir is more variable across the field and is not considered a target for initial field development. Average porosity for each reservoir ranges from 20 to 25 percent, and average Swi ranges from 23 to 45 percent. No OWC has been encountered in the Colsay-1 Reservoir, resulting in a wider range of uncertainty. Contacts in the Colsay-3 and Colsay-4 Reservoirs have been better defined by the current wells. A depth structure map on the top of the Colsay-1 Reservoir is shown in Figure 16.4.1. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of Rosebank Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap Colsay-1 9,000 Four-way Anticline with Stratigraphic Pinch-out Colsay-3 9,200 Four-way Anticline Colsay-4 9,500 Structural and Stratigraphic Traps
Page 63 16.2 METHODOLOGY Volumetric analysis and analogy were used to estimate the contingent resources for Rosebank Field. Our initial in-place estimates are based on a structural mapping. The low in-place estimates for the Colsay-1 and Colsay-4 Reservoirs are based on LKO seen in the 213/26-1 well, the high in-place estimates are based on structural spill points, and the mid case is represented by the average between the low and high estimates. The Colsay-1 Reservoir gas cap was mapped to a logged GOC. A low and high net pay map was created. For the Colsay-3 Reservoir, a single mid case was calculated to a logged OWC. We did not receive sufficient data to create meaningful high- and low-side scenarios, so assumptions of plus or minus 33 percent NTG away from well control were utilized to create a range of in-place estimates. Recovery assumptions are based on displacement data from special core analysis combined with assumptions on sweep efficiency. To assess reasonableness, we compared recovery estimates to analogous properties and the simulation modeling report from the operator. Oil plateau durations were estimated based on assumptions of sweep efficiency combined with Welge Method estimates of water breakthrough from core data. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for Rosebank Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution GOR (CF/BBL) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) Colsay-1 Oil/Gas 740 21 27 Colsay-3 Oil 785 21 23 Colsay-4 Oil 770 23 45 Development plans for Rosebank Field were provided by Ithaca, and a summary of the development timing for projects in Rosebank Field is shown in the table below. Project Timing Class Wells and Facilities 2022–2031 Contingent Resources 16.3 CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Rosebank Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Wells and Facilities 1C 28,479.5 21,778.3 0.0 032,234.4 Wells and Facilities 2C 58,216.4 44,043.1 0.0 065,810.1 Wells and Facilities 3C 92,487.7 70,667.0 0.0 104,671.6
16.4 FIGURES
                Figure 16.4.1
TECHNICAL DISCUSSION SECTION 17.0 TORNADO FIELD
Page 64 17.0 TORNADO FIELD _____________________________________________________________ Tornado Field, operated by Siccar Point, is located in Blocks 204/13 and 204/14d in the North Atlantic Ocean in a water depth of 3,445 ft. Tornado Field is shown on the location map in Figure 4.4.1. The field, located approximately 160 km west of the Shetland Islands, was discovered in 2009 with the drilling of the 204/13-1 well. One appraisal sidetrack was subsequently drilled (the 204/13-1Z). The first term of the current license expires in September 2022; however, it is our understanding that negotiations with regulators related to the requirements to extend the license for an additional two years are ongoing. Gas at Tornado Field is close to its dew point and its condensate yield is expected to fall with depletion. 17.1 GEOLOGY Tornado Field is a north-dipping, three-way dip closure with a southern stratigraphic pinch-out. The Paleocene T38c Reservoir consists of marine toe-of-slope turbidites and was identified by a bright seismic amplitude anomaly. The 204/13-1Z well logged an OWC and GOC. The reservoir exhibits excellent reservoir characteristics with 30 percent porosity and 21 percent Swi. A type log section illustrating this formation is shown in Figure 17.4.1. A depth structure map on the top of the T38c Reservoir is shown in Figure 17.4.2. A summary of certain geologic characteristics of Tornado Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Depth (ft TVDSS) Trap T38c 8,400 Stratigraphic Trap 17.2 METHODOLOGY Volumetric analysis and analogy were used to estimate the contingent resources for Tornado Field. Our initial in-place estimates are based on a structural mapping down to the logged OWC and GOC. We did not receive sufficient data to create meaningful high- and low-side scenarios, so assumptions of plus or minus 20 percent NTG away from well control were used to create a range of in-place estimates. We estimated fluid properties with an EOS model and with the gas composition data (no data were available for the oil rim). For the purposes of this report, we assumed the development would be standalone and independent of other projects. We assumed two subsea wells would be drilled and completed in the gas cap and tied back to the Tormore Facility. However, it is our understanding that the development plan has not yet been finalized and that there are also other alternatives under consideration. We expect a depletion drive mechanism for Tornado Field, and the recovery factors were estimated based on a simple material balance model taken from initial conditions to a range of assumed abandonment pressures. Nodal analysis supported our estimates of abandonment pressure and initial production rates. Because the completions are assumed to be in the gas cap away from the oil rim, minimal production of the oil phase is expected from the reservoir. A summary of certain petrophysical parameters for Tornado Field is shown in the table below. Reservoir Primary Fluid Solution CGR (BBL/MMCF) Average Porosity (%) Average Swi (%) T38c Oil/Gas 19 30 21 Development plans for Tornado Field were provided by Ithaca, and a summary of the development timing for projects in Tornado Field is shown in the table below.
Page 65 Project Timing Class Facilities 2024–2026 Contingent Resources Wells 2026 Contingent Resources 17.3 CONTINGENT RESOURCES BY PROJECT We estimate the Ithaca working interest contingent resources by development project for Tornado Field, as of June 30, 2022, to be: Working Interest Contingent Resources Project Category Oil (MBBL) Gas (MMCF) NGL (MBBL) Equivalent (MBOE) Wells and Facilities 1C 336.5 128,688.6 0.0 22,524.2 Wells and Facilities 2C 562.1 191,756.9 0.0 33,623.6 Wells and Facilities 3C 844.4 248,540.7 0.0 43,696.2
17.4 FIGURES